Part 1 - AL-Tax

Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax

eduart0.tripod.com
from eduart0.tripod.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Chapter 6the tax base. If, for example, in a high-tax country expenses were deducted in thecourse of developing, say, a production site including patents and manufacturingprocesses, the MNC may have reason to shift such functions to a low-tax and/orlow-wage country at a time when, along the product life cycle, the product startsgenerating high profits. Such a shift is often realized after the investment hasbeen paid and deducted (depreciation) and the losses carried forward are wipedout. As a consequence of outbound business restructuring at the time of the productlife cycle, the tax jurisdiction loses twice: Firstly, through the shift of tax baseof future profits and, secondly, when it previously allowed the deduction ofexpenses (depreciation) to establish this tax base (and in many cases, thirdly,even through tax holidays granted for the investment).In general, the identification of an MNC’s relevant tax base and the allocationof this tax base into the jurisdiction in which the multinational operates is a keyproblem in corporate income taxation. Some steps to harmonize international orsupranational corporate income taxation have already been taken: The dense netof double tax treaties, the OECD Model Tax Convention, and the OECD TransferPricing Guidelines, or the initial attempts of the EU tax harmonization process.However, the general institutionalization process in international taxation is stillin its infancy and is characterized by a low level of harmonization regardingcross-country procedures. 76.2.3 The role of APAs in taxing multinationalsSeveral national tax authorities have established Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)programs (for an overview, see Brem, 2005). An APA is an arrangement that determines,ideally in advance of controlled related-party transactions, an appropriate setof criteria for the determination of transfer pricing for those transactions over a fixedperiod of time (Vögele and Brem, 2003a; Sawyer, 2004). The criteria shaping an APAare, for example, the transfer pricing method(s) used, the possible third-party comparablesand appropriate adjustments, and the so-called critical assumptions whichdefine economic indicators as a framework for using TPMs: Ranges of currency fluctuation,market development, economic crises, etc.6.2.3.1 The OECD perspective on APAsNormally, an APA is formally initiated by a taxpayer and requires negotiationsbetween the taxpayer, one or more related-party entities, and the tax administration(s)117

International Taxation Handbookof one or more nation states. APAs are intended to supplement the traditionaladministrative, judicial, and treaty mechanisms for resolving transfer pricing issues.They may be most useful when traditional mechanisms to allocate income ofrelated-party business within a multinational group fail or are difficult to applybecause of a lack of institutionalization and standardization in internationaltaxation aspects, such as transfer pricing and tax base allocation (OECD, 2001b,Paragraph 4.124).The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines describe an APA as having the followingcharacteristics (in reference to the mutual agreement procedures (MAP) of theOECD):‘[. . .] The objectives of an APA process are to facilitate principled, practical andcooperative negotiations, to resolve transfer pricing issues expeditiously andprospectively, to use the resources of the taxpayer and the tax administration moreefficiently, and to provide a measure of predictability for the taxpayer.[. . .] To be successful, the process should be administered in a nonadversarial,efficient and practical fashion, and requires the cooperation of all the participatingparties. It is intended to supplement, rather than replace, the traditional administrative,judicial, and treaty mechanisms for resolving transfer pricing issues.Consideration of an APA may be most appropriate when the methodology forapplying the arm’s length principle gives rise to significant questions of reliabilityand accuracy, or when the specific circumstances of the transfer pricing issues beingconsidered are unusually complex.[. . .] One of the key objectives of the MAP APA process is the elimination ofpotential double taxation.’(OECD, 2001b, A9–11)In contrast to the traditional form of tax assessment, which is often an adversarialmechanism imposed by a sovereign tax authority, an APA is a kind of cooperativearrangement between tax authorities (of at least one jurisdiction) and amultinational corporate taxpayer (Ring, 2000; OECD, 2001b, Paragraph 4.135). Inaddition to classical ex-post binding rulings, an APA serves to resolve, in a cooperativemanner before the business has taken place, the potential transfer pricingdisputes between these parties. As the OECD points out:‘APAs, including unilateral ones, differ in some ways from more traditional privaterulings that some tax administrations issue to taxpayers. An APA generally dealswith factual issues, whereas more traditional private rulings tend to be limited toaddressing questions of a legal nature based on facts presented by a taxpayer.The facts underlying a private ruling request may not be questioned by the tax118

Chapter 6the tax base. If, for example, in a high-tax country expenses were deducted in thecourse of developing, say, a production site including patents and manufacturingprocesses, the MNC may have reason to shift such functions to a low-tax and/orlow-wage country at a time when, along the product life cycle, the product startsgenerating high profits. Such a shift is often realized after the investment hasbeen paid and deducted (depreciation) and the losses carried forward are wipedout. As a consequence of outbound business restructuring at the time of the productlife cycle, the tax jurisdiction loses twice: Firstly, through the shift of tax baseof future profits and, secondly, when it previously allowed the deduction ofexpenses (depreciation) to establish this tax base (and in many cases, thirdly,even through tax holidays granted for the investment).In general, the identification of an MNC’s relevant tax base and the allocationof this tax base into the jurisdiction in which the multinational operates is a keyproblem in corporate income taxation. Some steps to harmonize international orsupranational corporate income taxation have already been taken: The dense netof double tax treaties, the OECD Model <strong>Tax</strong> Convention, and the OECD TransferPricing Guidelines, or the initial attempts of the EU tax harmonization process.However, the general institutionalization process in international taxation is stillin its infancy and is characterized by a low level of harmonization regardingcross-country procedures. 76.2.3 The role of APAs in taxing multinationalsSeveral national tax authorities have established Advance Pricing Agreement (APA)programs (for an overview, see Brem, 2005). An APA is an arrangement that determines,ideally in advance of controlled related-party transactions, an appropriate setof criteria for the determination of transfer pricing for those transactions over a fixedperiod of time (Vögele and Brem, 2003a; Sawyer, 2004). The criteria shaping an APAare, for example, the transfer pricing method(s) used, the possible third-party comparablesand appropriate adjustments, and the so-called critical assumptions whichdefine economic indicators as a framework for using TPMs: Ranges of currency fluctuation,market development, economic crises, etc.6.2.3.1 The OECD perspective on APAsNormally, an APA is formally initiated by a taxpayer and requires negotiationsbetween the taxpayer, one or more related-party entities, and the tax administration(s)117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!