Part 1 - AL-Tax
Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax
Chapter 5either or both of the above questions in the positive will lead to recharacterizationof the transfer by a court as a conditional assignment or an assignment byway of security. The originator will, in the latter situation, be taken not to haverelinquished the entire benefit of, and the risks associated with, the assets, andthe relationship between the two entities will not be one of seller and buyer (asin the case of an absolute assignment or true sale) but of mortgagor and mortgagee(as in the case of an assignment by way of security or mortgage).A true sale, in common-law jurisdictions such as Australia, requires, as a minimum,a divestiture in favor of the securitization vehicle of the originator’s entirebeneficial interest in or equitable title to the securitization vehicle. This can beeffected as an absolute assignment either at law (where legal title to the assets ispassed to the securitization vehicle and the entire equitable title to the assets whichhas not been severed from the legal title passes also with the legal title) or in equity(where the entire equitable title is severed from the legal title and passed on to thesecuritization vehicle with legal title being retained by the originator) (Worthington,1996; Ali, 2002). The transfer in its entirety of the equitable title to the assets,whether as part of the legal title to the assets or following its severance from thelegal title, is sufficient to effect a transfer of the entire benefit and risks of the securitizedassets from the originator to the securitization vehicle.However, should the originator retain a right to share in the profits of the securitizedassets or remain liable to make good, either in whole or in part, any lossesincurred by the securitization vehicle on the assets, the originator will be viewedby a court as not having passed the entirety of its beneficial interest in the securitizedassets on to the securitization vehicle (Ali and de Vries Robbe, 2003). Thisretention of a beneficial interest in the securitized receivables means that thetransfer does not have the character of an absolute assignment but will rather becharacterized as an assignment by way of security (Ali, 2002). The use of the proceedsfrom the issue of the securities by the securitization vehicle to acquire thesecuritized assets will be seen not as the payment of the purchase price for thesale of the assets, but, instead, as the extension of a loan by the securitizationvehicle to the originator secured over the securitized assets.The dealing between the two entities is thus in the nature of a mortgage. Thesecuritization vehicle can be treated as having a fixed claim against the originatorfor the payment of an amount equivalent to the quantum of the proceeds exchangedby it for its interest in the securitized assets and, like any other mortgagee, can,should there be a shortfall between the value of the assets and the amountadvanced by it to the originator, claim that shortfall from the originator. In addition,the originator (like any other mortgagor), not the securitization vehicle, will103
International Taxation Handbooktake the benefit of any increase in value of the securitized assets above theamount advanced to the originator.Moreover, the originator’s retention of a beneficial interest in the securitizedassets means that those assets, even though the majority of the beneficial interesthas passed to the securitization vehicle, can still be attached by the originator’screditors, in the event of the originator’s insolvency. That beneficial interest, sinceit constitutes property, will continue to form part of the pool of assets available fordistribution, on insolvency, to the originator’s creditors. Accordingly, the failureof the transfer of assets to satisfy the requirements for a true sale means that,regardless of the fact that the originator does not own or control the securitizationvehicle, the securitization vehicle will not be bankruptcy remote from the originatorand the securitized assets will be pooled with the originator’s assets.The absence of a true sale will also abrogate the very rationale for the securitization.The investors in the securities issued by the securitization vehicle willremain exposed to the credit risk of the originator and, accordingly, will be in nodifferent a position to creditors that have advanced funds directly to the originator.The funds raised by the securitization vehicle (and which are to be passed onto the originator in the form of the purchase price for the securitized assets) willnot be priced on a basis that reflects only the creditworthiness of the securitizedassets, but will also take into account the originator’s creditworthiness. In addition,without a true sale, the originator will not be able to remove the securitizedassets from its balance sheet (and the funds received from the securitization vehiclewill need to be accounted for as a liability rather than an asset on the originator’sbalance sheet). Nor, if the originator is a bank, will it be able to release theregulatory capital held by it against the assets being securitized.The true sale of the securitized assets is thus an integral component of all cashsecuritizations. Care, however, must be taken when structuring the sale to ensurethat not only is the risk of recharacterization avoided or minimized, but also thatthe sale is neutral as regards stamp duty and similar taxation imposts. This is aparticularly onerous matter as regards international securitizations, where thequestions as to the efficacy of the sale and its neutrality must be examined in alljurisdictions in which the securitized assets are located.5.5 True sales and legal assignmentsStamp duty is a document-based impost. Accordingly, while a sale of assets (suchas the assets the subject of a securitization) may constitute a sale of dutiable assets,104
- Page 73 and 74: International Taxation Handbookτ*
- Page 75 and 76: International Taxation Handbookwher
- Page 77 and 78: International Taxation Handbookcoun
- Page 79 and 80: International Taxation Handbookown
- Page 81 and 82: International Taxation Handbookand
- Page 83 and 84: International Taxation Handbookand
- Page 85 and 86: 64Table 3.2Capital tax rates and in
- Page 87 and 88: International Taxation HandbookHays
- Page 89 and 90: International Taxation Handbookpape
- Page 91 and 92: International Taxation Handbookthat
- Page 93 and 94: International Taxation HandbookSwan
- Page 95 and 96: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 97 and 98: International Taxation Handbookequi
- Page 99 and 100: International Taxation Handbook4.2.
- Page 101 and 102: International Taxation HandbookTo c
- Page 103 and 104: International Taxation Handbookcase
- Page 105 and 106: International Taxation Handbookσ 1
- Page 107 and 108: International Taxation Handbook4.5
- Page 109 and 110: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 111 and 112: International Taxation HandbookHube
- Page 113 and 114: International Taxation HandbookTedi
- Page 115 and 116: International Taxation HandbookIt i
- Page 117 and 118: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 119 and 120: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 121 and 122: International Taxation Handbookregu
- Page 123: International Taxation Handbookterm
- Page 127 and 128: International Taxation Handbookat l
- Page 129 and 130: International Taxation Handbookothe
- Page 131 and 132: International Taxation HandbookCash
- Page 133 and 134: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 135 and 136: International Taxation HandbookThis
- Page 137 and 138: International Taxation Handbookas t
- Page 139 and 140: International Taxation Handbookof o
- Page 141 and 142: International Taxation Handbookbetw
- Page 143 and 144: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 145 and 146: International Taxation Handbook6.2.
- Page 147 and 148: International Taxation HandbookThey
- Page 149 and 150: International Taxation Handbookneut
- Page 151 and 152: International Taxation Handbookboun
- Page 153 and 154: International Taxation Handbookof t
- Page 155 and 156: Table 6.2Factors determining the ex
- Page 157 and 158: 136Table 6.2(Continued)Analytical F
- Page 159 and 160: International Taxation Handbook●
- Page 161 and 162: International Taxation Handbookthe
- Page 163 and 164: International Taxation HandbookNote
- Page 165 and 166: International Taxation HandbookErns
- Page 167 and 168: International Taxation HandbookWilk
- Page 169 and 170: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 171 and 172: International Taxation Handbooktest
- Page 173 and 174: International Taxation Handbookleng
International <strong>Tax</strong>ation Handbooktake the benefit of any increase in value of the securitized assets above theamount advanced to the originator.Moreover, the originator’s retention of a beneficial interest in the securitizedassets means that those assets, even though the majority of the beneficial interesthas passed to the securitization vehicle, can still be attached by the originator’screditors, in the event of the originator’s insolvency. That beneficial interest, sinceit constitutes property, will continue to form part of the pool of assets available fordistribution, on insolvency, to the originator’s creditors. Accordingly, the failureof the transfer of assets to satisfy the requirements for a true sale means that,regardless of the fact that the originator does not own or control the securitizationvehicle, the securitization vehicle will not be bankruptcy remote from the originatorand the securitized assets will be pooled with the originator’s assets.The absence of a true sale will also abrogate the very rationale for the securitization.The investors in the securities issued by the securitization vehicle willremain exposed to the credit risk of the originator and, accordingly, will be in nodifferent a position to creditors that have advanced funds directly to the originator.The funds raised by the securitization vehicle (and which are to be passed onto the originator in the form of the purchase price for the securitized assets) willnot be priced on a basis that reflects only the creditworthiness of the securitizedassets, but will also take into account the originator’s creditworthiness. In addition,without a true sale, the originator will not be able to remove the securitizedassets from its balance sheet (and the funds received from the securitization vehiclewill need to be accounted for as a liability rather than an asset on the originator’sbalance sheet). Nor, if the originator is a bank, will it be able to release theregulatory capital held by it against the assets being securitized.The true sale of the securitized assets is thus an integral component of all cashsecuritizations. Care, however, must be taken when structuring the sale to ensurethat not only is the risk of recharacterization avoided or minimized, but also thatthe sale is neutral as regards stamp duty and similar taxation imposts. This is aparticularly onerous matter as regards international securitizations, where thequestions as to the efficacy of the sale and its neutrality must be examined in alljurisdictions in which the securitized assets are located.5.5 True sales and legal assignmentsStamp duty is a document-based impost. Accordingly, while a sale of assets (suchas the assets the subject of a securitization) may constitute a sale of dutiable assets,104