Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net

Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net

12.07.2015 Views

Chapter 88.4.10 Minimisation of NH 3 emissions from granulationDescriptionThe liquid urea feedstock to the solidification section, either as a melt or as a concentratedsolution, contains some dissolved NH 3 . This arises from residual traces of ammoniumcarbonates, urea decomposition products and the dimerisation to biuret. This residual NH 3 isstripped/flashed during the solidification process and is released along with cooling air to theair.Gaseous formaldehyde, vaporised from a fine liquid mist injected into the hot air stream at thegranulator vent, reacts preferentially with the stripped NH 3 to form HMTA (hexamethylenetetramine). In this hot dry atmosphere, this is the preferential reaction rather than the standardurea-formaldehyde reaction. The urea-formaldehyde reaction would be prevalent in the diluteurea solution stage of the scrubbing operation downstream. The unstable HMTA compound isdissolved in the dilute scrubbing liquor (in this example, process water condensate) and isrecycled to the vacuum concentration section, where HMTA decomposes to NH 3 andformaldehyde. The formaldehyde is kept in solution, where it reacts with the large excess ofurea and finally becomes a part of the granulation additive. By absorption in the process watercondensate, NH 3 is recycled to the urea synthesis section. The formaldehyde finally ends up inthe product urea, where it is anyway used as a standard additive.Achieved environmental benefits• 50 % reduction in NH 3 emission.Cross-media effectsNone believed likely, if it is assumed that formaldehyde would have been used as a standardadditive anyway.Operational dataSee description.ApplicabilityGenerally applicable.EconomicsNo information provided.Driving force for implementationReduced emission levels.References to literature and example plants[133, Hydro Fertilizer Technology, 2000], YARA, Sluiskil and Incitec, Brisbane354 Large Volume Inorganic ChemicalsAmmonia, Acids and Fertilisers

Chapter 88.4.11 Treatment of exhaust gas from prilling/granulationDescriptionIn modern urea plants, the main pollution to the environment originates from the finishingsection, prilling or granulation. In both cases, the load of pollutants (0.4 – 0.6 % of the total feedto the plant) outweighs the load from the wet section of the plant by at least one order ofmagnitude (about 0.005 – 0.05 % of the total feed). In finishing (be it prilling or granulation) ahuge amount of air comes into contact with hot urea solution and solid urea, hence the exhaustgases are loaded with NH 3 and dust. With respect to exhaust gas treatment, a comparison ofgranulation and prilling yields the following results:• for particular industrial downstream applications, urea prills might be preferred• expensive treatment outweighs the main prilling advantage: low cost• granulation requires less air• dust from granulation is coarser, making dust removal easier.The efficiencies for NH 3 removal depend mainly on the applied scrubbing medium (acidic orwater scrubbing) and the number of absorption stages. The scrubbing liquor containing NH 3 andurea dust can be recycled to the urea process in the case of water scrubbing.SourceTreatmentAchievable levels in mg/Nm 3ReferenceDust NH 3(no treatment) 60 – 130 70 – 140 bAcidic scrubbing, up to 350000Nm 3 /hour15 – 23 3 – 9 bPrillingScrubbing, 1 kWh/1000 Nm 3 25 – 30 x a15 20 xx fWater scrubbing 55 30 ePacked bed scrubber 30 d30 30 xx cGranulationPacked bed scrubber 30 dWater scrubber, slightly acidic up to 30 10 – 20 g15 20 xx fx lower levels are achievable, but connected with a rapid rise in pressure drop and power consumptionxx including acidic scrubbinga [129, Stamicarbon, 2006]b [9, Austrian UBA, 2002], average levels, the permit level for both is 30 mg/Nm 3 , acidic scrubberc [130, Uhde, 2004], process specificationsd [127, Toyo, 2006]e [121, German UBA, 2001]f [126, Snamprogetti, 1999]g SKW PiesteritzTable 8.18: Overview of the treatment of exhaust gases from urea finishingLarge Volume Inorganic ChemicalsAmmonia, Acids and Fertilisers 355

Chapter 88.4.11 Treatment of exhaust gas from prilling/granulationDescriptionIn modern urea plants, the main pollution to the environment originates from the finishingsection, prilling or granulation. In both cases, the load of pollutants (0.4 – 0.6 % of the total feedto the plant) outweighs the load from the wet section of the plant by at least one order ofmagnitude (about 0.005 – 0.05 % of the total feed). In finishing (be it prilling or granulation) ahuge amount of air comes into contact with hot urea solution and solid urea, hence the exhaustgases are loaded with NH 3 and dust. With respect to exhaust gas treatment, a comparison ofgranulation and prilling yields the following results:• for particular industrial downstream applications, urea prills might be preferred• expensive treatment outweighs the main prilling advantage: low cost• granulation requires less air• dust from granulation is coarser, making dust removal easier.The efficiencies for NH 3 removal depend mainly on the applied scrubbing medium (acidic orwater scrubbing) and the number of absorption stages. The scrubbing liquor containing NH 3 andurea dust can be recycled to the urea process in the case of water scrubbing.SourceTreatmentAchievable levels in mg/Nm 3ReferenceDust NH 3(no treatment) 60 – 130 70 – 140 bAcidic scrubbing, up to 350000Nm 3 /hour15 – 23 3 – 9 bPrillingScrubbing, 1 kWh/1000 Nm 3 25 – 30 x a15 20 xx fWater scrubbing 55 30 ePacked bed scrubber 30 d30 30 xx cGranulationPacked bed scrubber 30 dWater scrubber, slightly acidic up to 30 10 – 20 g15 20 xx fx lower levels are achievable, but connected with a rapid rise in pressure drop and power consumptionxx including acidic scrubbinga [129, Stamicarbon, 2006]b [9, Austrian UBA, 2002], average levels, the permit level for both is 30 mg/Nm 3 , acidic scrubberc [130, Uhde, 2004], process specificationsd [127, Toyo, 2006]e [121, German UBA, 2001]f [126, Snamprogetti, 1999]g SKW PiesteritzTable 8.18: Overview of the treatment of exhaust gases from urea finishing<strong>Large</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>Inorganic</strong> <strong>Chemicals</strong> – <strong>Ammonia</strong>, Acids and Fertilisers 355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!