Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net
Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net
Chapter 88.4.10 Minimisation of NH 3 emissions from granulationDescriptionThe liquid urea feedstock to the solidification section, either as a melt or as a concentratedsolution, contains some dissolved NH 3 . This arises from residual traces of ammoniumcarbonates, urea decomposition products and the dimerisation to biuret. This residual NH 3 isstripped/flashed during the solidification process and is released along with cooling air to theair.Gaseous formaldehyde, vaporised from a fine liquid mist injected into the hot air stream at thegranulator vent, reacts preferentially with the stripped NH 3 to form HMTA (hexamethylenetetramine). In this hot dry atmosphere, this is the preferential reaction rather than the standardurea-formaldehyde reaction. The urea-formaldehyde reaction would be prevalent in the diluteurea solution stage of the scrubbing operation downstream. The unstable HMTA compound isdissolved in the dilute scrubbing liquor (in this example, process water condensate) and isrecycled to the vacuum concentration section, where HMTA decomposes to NH 3 andformaldehyde. The formaldehyde is kept in solution, where it reacts with the large excess ofurea and finally becomes a part of the granulation additive. By absorption in the process watercondensate, NH 3 is recycled to the urea synthesis section. The formaldehyde finally ends up inthe product urea, where it is anyway used as a standard additive.Achieved environmental benefits• 50 % reduction in NH 3 emission.Cross-media effectsNone believed likely, if it is assumed that formaldehyde would have been used as a standardadditive anyway.Operational dataSee description.ApplicabilityGenerally applicable.EconomicsNo information provided.Driving force for implementationReduced emission levels.References to literature and example plants[133, Hydro Fertilizer Technology, 2000], YARA, Sluiskil and Incitec, Brisbane354 Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers
Chapter 88.4.11 Treatment of exhaust gas from prilling/granulationDescriptionIn modern urea plants, the main pollution to the environment originates from the finishingsection, prilling or granulation. In both cases, the load of pollutants (0.4 – 0.6 % of the total feedto the plant) outweighs the load from the wet section of the plant by at least one order ofmagnitude (about 0.005 – 0.05 % of the total feed). In finishing (be it prilling or granulation) ahuge amount of air comes into contact with hot urea solution and solid urea, hence the exhaustgases are loaded with NH 3 and dust. With respect to exhaust gas treatment, a comparison ofgranulation and prilling yields the following results:• for particular industrial downstream applications, urea prills might be preferred• expensive treatment outweighs the main prilling advantage: low cost• granulation requires less air• dust from granulation is coarser, making dust removal easier.The efficiencies for NH 3 removal depend mainly on the applied scrubbing medium (acidic orwater scrubbing) and the number of absorption stages. The scrubbing liquor containing NH 3 andurea dust can be recycled to the urea process in the case of water scrubbing.SourceTreatmentAchievable levels in mg/Nm 3ReferenceDust NH 3(no treatment) 60 – 130 70 – 140 bAcidic scrubbing, up to 350000Nm 3 /hour15 – 23 3 – 9 bPrillingScrubbing, 1 kWh/1000 Nm 3 25 – 30 x a15 20 xx fWater scrubbing 55 30 ePacked bed scrubber 30 d30 30 xx cGranulationPacked bed scrubber 30 dWater scrubber, slightly acidic up to 30 10 – 20 g15 20 xx fx lower levels are achievable, but connected with a rapid rise in pressure drop and power consumptionxx including acidic scrubbinga [129, Stamicarbon, 2006]b [9, Austrian UBA, 2002], average levels, the permit level for both is 30 mg/Nm 3 , acidic scrubberc [130, Uhde, 2004], process specificationsd [127, Toyo, 2006]e [121, German UBA, 2001]f [126, Snamprogetti, 1999]g SKW PiesteritzTable 8.18: Overview of the treatment of exhaust gases from urea finishingLarge Volume Inorganic Chemicals – Ammonia, Acids and Fertilisers 355
- Page 331 and 332: Chapter7Driving force for implement
- Page 333 and 334: Chapter7Achieved environmental bene
- Page 335 and 336: Chapter77.4.6 Recycling warm airDes
- Page 337 and 338: Chapter77.4.7 Optimising the recycl
- Page 339 and 340: Chapter7Operational dataThe volume
- Page 341 and 342: Chapter7Achieved environmental bene
- Page 343 and 344: Chapter7Achieved environmental bene
- Page 345 and 346: Chapter77.4.11 Recycling of scrubbi
- Page 347 and 348: Chapter77.4.12 Waste water treatmen
- Page 349: Chapter7ParameterLevelmg/Nm 3Phosph
- Page 352 and 353: Chapter 88.2 Applied processes and
- Page 354 and 355: Chapter 88.2.1.1 Particle formation
- Page 356 and 357: Chapter 8Consumption of Per tonne u
- Page 358 and 359: Chapter 8Per tonne urea Unit Remark
- Page 360 and 361: Chapter 8Waste water per tonne urea
- Page 362 and 363: Chapter 8Pollutant Source g/tonne u
- Page 364 and 365: Chapter 8Plant Emission Amount (ton
- Page 366 and 367: Chapter 8Achieved environmental ben
- Page 368 and 369: Chapter 8Operational dataSee Table
- Page 370 and 371: Chapter 8Operational dataSee Table
- Page 372 and 373: Chapter 8Driving force for implemen
- Page 374 and 375: Chapter 88.4.6 Redirecting fines to
- Page 376 and 377: Chapter 8Existing plantCase 2Revamp
- Page 378 and 379: Chapter 88.4.8 Heat integration in
- Page 380 and 381: Chapter 88.4.9 Combined condensatio
- Page 384 and 385: Chapter 8Achieved environmental ben
- Page 386 and 387: Chapter 8Other approaches to proces
- Page 388 and 389: Chapter 8Achieved environmental ben
- Page 390 and 391: Chapter 88.5 BAT for Urea and UANBA
- Page 392 and 393: Chapter 9Country Company LocationBe
- Page 394 and 395: Chapter 99.2.2 NeutralisationThe ex
- Page 396 and 397: Chapter 9Scrubbing devices• packe
- Page 398 and 399: Chapter 99.3 Current emission and c
- Page 400 and 401: Chapter 9Pollutant mg/Nm 3 g/tonne
- Page 402 and 403: Chapter 99.4 Techniques to consider
- Page 404 and 405: Chapter 99.4.2 Recovery of residual
- Page 406 and 407: Chapter 99.4.3 Energy consideration
- Page 408 and 409: Chapter 99.4.4 Steam purification a
- Page 410 and 411: Chapter 99.4.5 Autothermal granulat
- Page 412 and 413: Chapter 9ApplicabilityIrrigated can
- Page 415 and 416: Chapter 1010 SUPERPHOSPHATES10.1 Ge
- Page 417 and 418: Chapter 10Emissionto airEmissionto
- Page 419 and 420: Chapter 10Input Indirect granulatio
- Page 421 and 422: Chapter 10Volume5 - 10 m 3 /hourTem
- Page 423 and 424: Chapter 1010.4.2 Recovery and abate
- Page 425 and 426: Chapter 1010.4.4 Recycling of scrub
- Page 427 and 428: Chapter 1111 CONCLUDING REMARKS11.1
- Page 429: Chapter 11Production of HNO 3 : De-
Chapter 88.4.11 Treatment of exhaust gas from prilling/granulationDescriptionIn modern urea plants, the main pollution to the environment originates from the finishingsection, prilling or granulation. In both cases, the load of pollutants (0.4 – 0.6 % of the total feedto the plant) outweighs the load from the wet section of the plant by at least one order ofmagnitude (about 0.005 – 0.05 % of the total feed). In finishing (be it prilling or granulation) ahuge amount of air comes into contact with hot urea solution and solid urea, hence the exhaustgases are loaded with NH 3 and dust. With respect to exhaust gas treatment, a comparison ofgranulation and prilling yields the following results:• for particular industrial downstream applications, urea prills might be preferred• expensive treatment outweighs the main prilling advantage: low cost• granulation requires less air• dust from granulation is coarser, making dust removal easier.The efficiencies for NH 3 removal depend mainly on the applied scrubbing medium (acidic orwater scrubbing) and the number of absorption stages. The scrubbing liquor containing NH 3 andurea dust can be recycled to the urea process in the case of water scrubbing.SourceTreatmentAchievable levels in mg/Nm 3ReferenceDust NH 3(no treatment) 60 – 130 70 – 140 bAcidic scrubbing, up to 350000Nm 3 /hour15 – 23 3 – 9 bPrillingScrubbing, 1 kWh/1000 Nm 3 25 – 30 x a15 20 xx fWater scrubbing 55 30 ePacked bed scrubber 30 d30 30 xx cGranulationPacked bed scrubber 30 dWater scrubber, slightly acidic up to 30 10 – 20 g15 20 xx fx lower levels are achievable, but connected with a rapid rise in pressure drop and power consumptionxx including acidic scrubbinga [129, Stamicarbon, 2006]b [9, Austrian UBA, 2002], average levels, the permit level for both is 30 mg/Nm 3 , acidic scrubberc [130, Uhde, 2004], process specificationsd [127, Toyo, 2006]e [121, German UBA, 2001]f [126, Snamprogetti, 1999]g SKW PiesteritzTable 8.18: Overview of the treatment of exhaust gases from urea finishing<strong>Large</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>Inorganic</strong> <strong>Chemicals</strong> – <strong>Ammonia</strong>, Acids and Fertilisers 355