Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net

Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net Large Volume Inorganic Chemicals - Ammonia ... - ammk-rks.net

12.07.2015 Views

Chapter 8Existing plantCase 2Revamp optionCase 3Revamp optionSome featuresConventional,crystallisation, naturaldraft prillingCO 2 stripping, vacuumevaporation, prilling withfan, process condensatetreatmentCO 2 stripping, vacuumevaporation, granulation,process condensatetreatmentEnergy consumption in GJ/tonne ureaSteam 4.6 3.1 3.1Electricity 0.9 0.7 0.8Total 5.5 3.8 3.9Table 8.17: Studies on steam and electricity consumption for a revamp project[122, Toyo, 2002]Achieved environmental benefits• particular potential for reduction of steam consumption (see also Table 8.5)• considerable potential for reduction of electrical energy consumption• considerable potential for reduction of cooling water consumption.Cross-media effectsNone believed likely.Operational dataNo specific information provided.ApplicabilityGenerally applicable to existing conventional total recycling plants. Various technologysuppliers claim compatibility of their stripping equipment with various existing systems.EconomicsHigh investment costs are paid back by considerable savings through• increased capacity, assuming that this requires additional CO 2 compression capacity andadditional capacity for product finishing• lower utility requirements• lower maintenance costs• increased onstream factor.Driving force for implementationIncrease production capacity.348 Large Volume Inorganic ChemicalsAmmonia, Acids and Fertilisers

Chapter 8References to literature and example plants[52, infoMil, 2001, 123, Toyo, 2003, 124, Stamicarbon, 2004, 126, Snamprogetti, 1999]• Sichuan Chemical Works Ltd revamped a Toyo TR-Ci to an improved ACES system in2004• PIC Kuwait revamped a conventional 1065 tonnes/day plant to a capacity of 1750tonnes/day with CO 2 stripping technology and a pool condenser in 2004.Large Volume Inorganic ChemicalsAmmonia, Acids and Fertilisers 349

Chapter 8Existing plantCase 2Revamp optionCase 3Revamp optionSome featuresConventional,crystallisation, naturaldraft prillingCO 2 stripping, vacuumevaporation, prilling withfan, process condensatetreatmentCO 2 stripping, vacuumevaporation, granulation,process condensatetreatmentEnergy consumption in GJ/tonne ureaSteam 4.6 3.1 3.1Electricity 0.9 0.7 0.8Total 5.5 3.8 3.9Table 8.17: Studies on steam and electricity consumption for a revamp project[122, Toyo, 2002]Achieved environmental benefits• particular potential for reduction of steam consumption (see also Table 8.5)• considerable potential for reduction of electrical energy consumption• considerable potential for reduction of cooling water consumption.Cross-media effectsNone believed likely.Operational dataNo specific information provided.ApplicabilityGenerally applicable to existing conventional total recycling plants. Various technologysuppliers claim compatibility of their stripping equipment with various existing systems.EconomicsHigh investment costs are paid back by considerable savings through• increased capacity, assuming that this requires additional CO 2 compression capacity andadditional capacity for product finishing• lower utility requirements• lower maintenance costs• increased onstream factor.Driving force for implementationIncrease production capacity.348 <strong>Large</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>Inorganic</strong> <strong>Chemicals</strong> – <strong>Ammonia</strong>, Acids and Fertilisers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!