4"12-Z 1 - part - usaid
4"12-Z 1 - part - usaid
4"12-Z 1 - part - usaid
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
• 5906-01/02AIBURSHTYN/5117/95<br />
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
1.1 Introduction<br />
The audit team of John Hallberg and Prem Gupta spent five days, March 3 through March 7,<br />
1995 at the Burshtyn power plant, about 90 Km south of LVIV CIty. They performed the<br />
followmg energy audit as representatIves of Bums and Roe Company of Oradell, New Jersey.<br />
The Burshtyn power plant IS presently 100% government owned, but IS m the process of<br />
reorganizatIon for privatIzatIon wIth the government change to a free market economy. The<br />
plant consists of twelve 200 MW umts. The plant was commIssIoned between 1965 and 1969<br />
and exports power to eastern Europe.<br />
The coal the station bums is from LVIV coal mines, the Donetsk regIOn, Poland and Ekibastusk.<br />
Because of the poor quality of coal, the plant has to co-fire expensIve Imported mazut and<br />
natural gas to support combustIon and to reach rated boiler performance. TypICally the statIOn<br />
fires 80% coal, 10% natural gas, and 10% mazut.<br />
Unit <strong>12</strong> is now under reconstructIOn includmg turbme repaIr, new HP and LP cylmders, and<br />
electrostatic precipItator. The Umt <strong>12</strong> boiler has all cntIcal pressure <strong>part</strong>s and membranes<br />
replaced and the steam drum checked, with an expected 20-25 year lIfe extenSIOn.<br />
1.2 Principal Findin&s<br />
Several Energy Conservation OpportumtIes (BCO's) for the power plant were Identified for short<br />
term low cost measures and for longer term higher cost measures for large energy savmgs. The<br />
low cost measures mclude instrumentatIOn for measunng fuel consumptIOn and heatmg values<br />
and for controllIng combustion effiCIency WhICh would result m short SImple payback penods<br />
Larger cost long term measures include major combustIOn control system upgrades, mcludmg<br />
interlocks and flame safeguard systems, coal, ash and laboratory instruments, and would result<br />
in payback penods of about one to three years.<br />
RehabilItation and reconstructIon studIes have been completed on thIS power plant to evaluate<br />
the options: (1) lIfe extension of eXIstIng umts, (2) complete replacement with new power plant,<br />
or (3) a mix of lIfe extension presently being done WIth additIOn of new umts. The objectIves<br />
are to be able to cleanly bum the eXIstmg poor qUalIty coals, remove S02 and mImmize NO x<br />
formatIon and increase boiler effiCIency and relIabIlIty One proposed option IS reconstructIOn<br />
with atmosphenc circulatIOn flUIdIzed bed (ACFB) bOIlers.<br />
I