Description of methods and sources for Albania - INSTAT
Description of methods and sources for Albania - INSTAT Description of methods and sources for Albania - INSTAT
IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary StatisticalCooperation ProgrammeThe estimation of Non-observed economy for the year 2006 is not done according tothis method due to lack of information on the supply side. No survey was done in2006 from the supply side that we could use for the calculation of labor input fromthe households. Estimations are based on the recommendations given by foreignmission, taken into account the trends and specific characteristic of differentbranches in Albania. Under these conditions, NOE has been estimated as a trendbetween the years 2001-2005. Future estimates of non-observed economy will beimproved by the establishment in 2007 of the LFS, a survey specifically designed forlabor statistics. Hence when we will start to use the figures of LFS we also intend torevise the estimation of NOE for 2006.7.3.4. Estimation of Non-observed economy in Agriculture and FishingThe NOE of Agriculture sector is estimated by “expert method” due to lack ofsources information on labor market. The “expert method” is based on experts’opinions where they assess the share of NOE in each branch of economic activity.These experts provide percentages that represent the value of output and intermediateconsumption under-estimated in branches of NACE A (Agriculture, hunting,forestry) and NACE B (Fishing). The percentages are applied to the observed outputand intermediate consumption of these two sectors. The way how the observedoutput and intermediate consumption in those branches are calculated, is shown inchapter 3. The non-observed value added is the difference between the non-observedoutput and non-observed intermediate consumption. The following table presents the“expert method”.52Table 7.2: Illustration of Expert method of Agriculture, hunting andforestry in the year 2006In Million LEKBranchesOutputIntermediateconsumptionValue AddedAgriculture, hunting andforestry (observed value)195,706 63,656 132,050Percentage of NOE (in %) 14 10Value of NOE 27,319 6,363 20,956110/236
IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary StatisticalCooperation Programme53Table 7.3: Illustration of Expert method of Fishing and Forestry in the year2006In Million LEKBranchesOutputIntermediateconsumptionValue AddedFishing (observed value) 3,333 2,077 1,256Percentage of NOE 21.9 16.6Value of NOE 729 344 385The “Expert method” used in Agriculture and Fishing could be explained muchbetter by the following formula:-Agriculture, hunting and forestryNon-observed Output = Observed output * Percentage of non-observed outputNon-observed IC = Observed IC* Percentage of non-observed ICNon-observed Value Added = Non-observed Output – Non-observed ICWhere the percentages of non-observed output and IC are given by experts and areequal to 14 % for output and 10% for intermediate consumption- FishingNon-observed Output = Observed output * Percentage of non-observed outputNon-observed IC = Observed IC* Percentage of non-observed ICNon-observed Value Added = Non-observed Output – Non-observed ICWhere the percentages of non-observed output and IC are given by experts and areequal to 21.9 % for output and 16.6% for intermediate consumption7.4. Exhaustiveness adjustments by activityExhaustiveness adjustments by activity are shown in table 4. The higher value ofnon-observed economy was produced in the sectors of construction, trade and hotels.111/236
- Page 59 and 60: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 61 and 62: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 63 and 64: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 65 and 66: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 67 and 68: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 69 and 70: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 71 and 72: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 73 and 74: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 75 and 76: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 77 and 78: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 79 and 80: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 81 and 82: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 83 and 84: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 85 and 86: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 87 and 88: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 89 and 90: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 91 and 92: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 93 and 94: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 95 and 96: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 97 and 98: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 99 and 100: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 101 and 102: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 103 and 104: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 105 and 106: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 107 and 108: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 109: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 113 and 114: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 115 and 116: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 117 and 118: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 119 and 120: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 121 and 122: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 123 and 124: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 125 and 126: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 127 and 128: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 129 and 130: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 131 and 132: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 133 and 134: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 135 and 136: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 137 and 138: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 139 and 140: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 141 and 142: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 143 and 144: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 145 and 146: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 147 and 148: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 149 and 150: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 151 and 152: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 153 and 154: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 155 and 156: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 157 and 158: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 159 and 160: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary StatisticalCooperation ProgrammeThe estimation <strong>of</strong> Non-observed economy <strong>for</strong> the year 2006 is not done according tothis method due to lack <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation on the supply side. No survey was done in2006 from the supply side that we could use <strong>for</strong> the calculation <strong>of</strong> labor input fromthe households. Estimations are based on the recommendations given by <strong>for</strong>eignmission, taken into account the trends <strong>and</strong> specific characteristic <strong>of</strong> differentbranches in <strong>Albania</strong>. Under these conditions, NOE has been estimated as a trendbetween the years 2001-2005. Future estimates <strong>of</strong> non-observed economy will beimproved by the establishment in 2007 <strong>of</strong> the LFS, a survey specifically designed <strong>for</strong>labor statistics. Hence when we will start to use the figures <strong>of</strong> LFS we also intend torevise the estimation <strong>of</strong> NOE <strong>for</strong> 2006.7.3.4. Estimation <strong>of</strong> Non-observed economy in Agriculture <strong>and</strong> FishingThe NOE <strong>of</strong> Agriculture sector is estimated by “expert method” due to lack <strong>of</strong><strong>sources</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation on labor market. The “expert method” is based on experts’opinions where they assess the share <strong>of</strong> NOE in each branch <strong>of</strong> economic activity.These experts provide percentages that represent the value <strong>of</strong> output <strong>and</strong> intermediateconsumption under-estimated in branches <strong>of</strong> NACE A (Agriculture, hunting,<strong>for</strong>estry) <strong>and</strong> NACE B (Fishing). The percentages are applied to the observed output<strong>and</strong> intermediate consumption <strong>of</strong> these two sectors. The way how the observedoutput <strong>and</strong> intermediate consumption in those branches are calculated, is shown inchapter 3. The non-observed value added is the difference between the non-observedoutput <strong>and</strong> non-observed intermediate consumption. The following table presents the“expert method”.52Table 7.2: Illustration <strong>of</strong> Expert method <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, hunting <strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong>estry in the year 2006In Million LEKBranchesOutputIntermediateconsumptionValue AddedAgriculture, hunting <strong>and</strong><strong>for</strong>estry (observed value)195,706 63,656 132,050Percentage <strong>of</strong> NOE (in %) 14 10Value <strong>of</strong> NOE 27,319 6,363 20,956110/236