Description of methods and sources for Albania - INSTAT
Description of methods and sources for Albania - INSTAT Description of methods and sources for Albania - INSTAT
IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary StatisticalCooperation Programme7.3.2. Productivity of labor inputProductivity measures based on VA per employed were calculated according to theNA Department for branches and for dimensional classes. (See Table 7.1.1, col. 10,11, 12, 13)From the Italian experience, the per capita value added made in undergroundeconomy is lower than the per capita value added of observed economy and for thisreason we have to use the per capita value added by small enterprises which is thelowest per capita value added.Another phenomenon exists in our economy, namely, per capita value added oflarger enterprises is the smallest and this happens because those enterprises intendto increase the intermediate costs and decrease the output.In regard with the above phenomenon, the use of the smallest per capita value addedin each branch was deemed reasonable in spite of the size of enterprise. Suchestimate allowed to distinguish the productivity of observed from non observedactivity (e.g., considering the productivity of the non observed activity equaling tothe productivity of the less efficient enterprise).So the productivity of hidden labor input (VA/ILNOE) is equal to the minimumproductivity of observed labor input (VA/ILOE) in each branch in spite of the sizeclass (See Table 7.1.1, column 14)7.3.3. The value of Non-Observed EconomyNow it is possible to calculate (by branch) the Total Value Added of NOETOTVANOE = VA/ILNOE * ΔIBy this procedure we may obtain an estimate of VA taking into consideration acomponent of NOE, defined as Underground Economy (See Table 7.1.1, col. 17)106/236
IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary StatisticalCooperation Programme50Table 7.1.1:Estimation of NOE (Illustration of Method for year 2001) (...continues)CodeBranchesNumber of persons in NA Census Value Added of Formal Economy (000/LEK)LARGE MEDIUM SMALL TOTALof 2001LARGE MEDIUM SMALL TOTAL1 2 3 4=1+2+3 5 6 7 8 9=6+7+83-14 Industry 44,241 9,793 12,134 66,168 73793 17,624,700 5,163,664 7,402,244 30,190,60815 Construction 5,118 9,062 2,875 17,055 68661 3,793,817 10,273,046 3,166,758 17,233,62016,17 Trade, hotels 2,550 7,211 53,241 63,002 160771 2,249,724 7,395,942 44,546,335 54,192,00118 Transport 3,642 1,139 12,828 17,610 51934 2,633,703 1,094,391 17,051,017 20,779,11219Post-Communication5,906 63 77 6,046 6046 16,059,532 106,863 72,820 16,239,21521,25 Other services 5,305 3,466 6,507 15,277 26875 1,750,527 1,413,862 8,736,407 11,900,796Total 66,761 30,733 87,663 185,158 388,080 44,112,003 25,447,767 80,975,582 150,535,352107/236
- Page 55 and 56: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 57 and 58: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 59 and 60: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 61 and 62: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 63 and 64: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 65 and 66: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 67 and 68: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 69 and 70: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 71 and 72: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 73 and 74: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 75 and 76: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 77 and 78: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 79 and 80: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 81 and 82: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 83 and 84: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 85 and 86: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 87 and 88: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 89 and 90: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 91 and 92: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 93 and 94: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 95 and 96: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 97 and 98: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 99 and 100: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 101 and 102: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 103 and 104: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 105: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 109 and 110: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 111 and 112: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 113 and 114: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 115 and 116: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 117 and 118: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 119 and 120: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 121 and 122: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 123 and 124: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 125 and 126: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 127 and 128: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 129 and 130: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 131 and 132: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 133 and 134: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 135 and 136: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 137 and 138: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 139 and 140: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 141 and 142: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 143 and 144: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 145 and 146: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 147 and 148: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 149 and 150: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 151 and 152: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 153 and 154: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
- Page 155 and 156: IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary Statisti
IPA 2009 Multi-beneficiary StatisticalCooperation Programme7.3.2. Productivity <strong>of</strong> labor inputProductivity measures based on VA per employed were calculated according to theNA Department <strong>for</strong> branches <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> dimensional classes. (See Table 7.1.1, col. 10,11, 12, 13)From the Italian experience, the per capita value added made in undergroundeconomy is lower than the per capita value added <strong>of</strong> observed economy <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> thisreason we have to use the per capita value added by small enterprises which is thelowest per capita value added.Another phenomenon exists in our economy, namely, per capita value added <strong>of</strong>larger enterprises is the smallest <strong>and</strong> this happens because those enterprises intendto increase the intermediate costs <strong>and</strong> decrease the output.In regard with the above phenomenon, the use <strong>of</strong> the smallest per capita value addedin each branch was deemed reasonable in spite <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> enterprise. Suchestimate allowed to distinguish the productivity <strong>of</strong> observed from non observedactivity (e.g., considering the productivity <strong>of</strong> the non observed activity equaling tothe productivity <strong>of</strong> the less efficient enterprise).So the productivity <strong>of</strong> hidden labor input (VA/ILNOE) is equal to the minimumproductivity <strong>of</strong> observed labor input (VA/ILOE) in each branch in spite <strong>of</strong> the sizeclass (See Table 7.1.1, column 14)7.3.3. The value <strong>of</strong> Non-Observed EconomyNow it is possible to calculate (by branch) the Total Value Added <strong>of</strong> NOETOTVANOE = VA/ILNOE * ΔIBy this procedure we may obtain an estimate <strong>of</strong> VA taking into consideration acomponent <strong>of</strong> NOE, defined as Underground Economy (See Table 7.1.1, col. 17)106/236