Myanmar - Global Tiger Initiative
Myanmar - Global Tiger Initiative Myanmar - Global Tiger Initiative
National Tiger Action Plan for The Union of Myanmar2.6 Protected area management – Myanmar is one of the least externally funded and internallyprotected tropical countries in Asia (Balmford & Long 1995). As a result while forests havebeen conserved for timber production for almost 150 years (Bryant 1997), and the earliestprotected area was gazetted in 1918, legislation to protect both wildlife and their habitatswas only introduced in 1994. Wildlife training for protected area staff was initiated in 1995with only a third of staff having received training (Rao et al. 2002)(Fig. 8). Only since 1998have protected areas been designed to protect entire landscapes and the ecological processeswithin. Consequently, many of the older protected areas e.g. Pidaung Wildlife Sanctuary, nolonger support tigers and other wildlife because of large-scale degradation and loss of habitatinside them. A recent review found that human activities incompatible with conservationoccur in every protected area (Rao et al. 2002). Extraction of non-timber forest productsoccurred in 85% of the areas, hunting in up to 70%, while buffer zones for the protection ofcore forest zones were generally lacking. The combined effect is a loss of habitat quality fortigers. Myanmar protected areas (Fig. 1.) currently do not provide adequate representationof the diversity of habitats inhabited by tigers. Reserve managers need training to understandthreats to wildlife, and how to best manage available resources to enable effective conservationof wildlife. In general, the roles and responsibilities of protected area staff need to be carefullydefined so that available personnel cover important tasks.2.7 Social perception – Where tiger populations have been decimated, their long-term recoverycan be ensured only by a combination of political will and acceptance by people living inand around tiger areas. If tigers are worth more dead than alive to local people, then effortsto preserve tigers in the human dominated landscape will fail. Awareness and education ofthe importance of tigers can be improved through dedicated learning programs.Fig. 3a.Tiger skin for sale in Tachileikmarket, Shan State.Fig 3b. Poacher recorded by camera-trapat Paunglaung Catchment, MandalayDivision. Poaching of tigers was the singlemost important factor causing the demiseof tigers in Myanmar in the past.6.
Part 2: Threats to TigersFig. 4. Wildlife for sale at Mongla market,Shan State.Fig. 5. Logging reduces available habitat,and alters habitat quality for tigers andtheir prey.Fig. 6. Road construction opens up theforest facilitating access to poachers.Fig. 7. The extraction of rattan and othernon-timber forest products is often done ona massive scale and affects habitat qualityfor tigers and their prey.Fig. 8. Myanmar foresters undertakingbasic wildlife training with the author,Alaungdaw Kathapa National Park,December 1998.7.
- Page 3 and 4: A National Tiger Action PlanForThe
- Page 5 and 6: 5.4 Improving forestry management t
- Page 7 and 8: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSA vast number of pe
- Page 9 and 10: FOREWORDIt is with great pleasure t
- Page 11 and 12: 2. Tigers may serve as conservation
- Page 13 and 14: TABLE 1: NATIONAL TIGER ACTION PLAN
- Page 15 and 16: Organisation delivering Timeframe /
- Page 17: Timeframe / to be completed by2003
- Page 20 and 21: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 22 and 23: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 26 and 27: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 28 and 29: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 30 and 31: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 32 and 33: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 34 and 35: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 36 and 37: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 38 and 39: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 40 and 41: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 42 and 43: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 44 and 45: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 46 and 47: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 48 and 49: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 50 and 51: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 52 and 53: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 54 and 55: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 56 and 57: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 58 and 59: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 60 and 61: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 62 and 63: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 64 and 65: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 66 and 67: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 68 and 69: 50.Record Name of site Latitude Lat
- Page 70 and 71: National Tiger Action Plan for The
- Page 72 and 73: National Tiger Action Plan for The
National <strong>Tiger</strong> Action Plan for The Union of <strong>Myanmar</strong>2.6 Protected area management – <strong>Myanmar</strong> is one of the least externally funded and internallyprotected tropical countries in Asia (Balmford & Long 1995). As a result while forests havebeen conserved for timber production for almost 150 years (Bryant 1997), and the earliestprotected area was gazetted in 1918, legislation to protect both wildlife and their habitatswas only introduced in 1994. Wildlife training for protected area staff was initiated in 1995with only a third of staff having received training (Rao et al. 2002)(Fig. 8). Only since 1998have protected areas been designed to protect entire landscapes and the ecological processeswithin. Consequently, many of the older protected areas e.g. Pidaung Wildlife Sanctuary, nolonger support tigers and other wildlife because of large-scale degradation and loss of habitatinside them. A recent review found that human activities incompatible with conservationoccur in every protected area (Rao et al. 2002). Extraction of non-timber forest productsoccurred in 85% of the areas, hunting in up to 70%, while buffer zones for the protection ofcore forest zones were generally lacking. The combined effect is a loss of habitat quality fortigers. <strong>Myanmar</strong> protected areas (Fig. 1.) currently do not provide adequate representationof the diversity of habitats inhabited by tigers. Reserve managers need training to understandthreats to wildlife, and how to best manage available resources to enable effective conservationof wildlife. In general, the roles and responsibilities of protected area staff need to be carefullydefined so that available personnel cover important tasks.2.7 Social perception – Where tiger populations have been decimated, their long-term recoverycan be ensured only by a combination of political will and acceptance by people living inand around tiger areas. If tigers are worth more dead than alive to local people, then effortsto preserve tigers in the human dominated landscape will fail. Awareness and education ofthe importance of tigers can be improved through dedicated learning programs.Fig. 3a.<strong>Tiger</strong> skin for sale in Tachileikmarket, Shan State.Fig 3b. Poacher recorded by camera-trapat Paunglaung Catchment, MandalayDivision. Poaching of tigers was the singlemost important factor causing the demiseof tigers in <strong>Myanmar</strong> in the past.6.