Lotis Blue Butterfly Recovery Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Li teratu re Ci ted Arnold, R. A. 1978. Survey and status of six endangered butterflies in Cal ifornia, 1977. Cal if. Dept. of Fish and Game, Nongame Wildl. Invest. Report. 95 pp. Arnold, I?. A. 1980. Ecological studies of 6 endangered butterflies: island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the design of nature preserves. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley. 365 pp. Arnold, R. A. 1981a. A review of endangered species legislation in the U.S.A. and prel iminary research on 6 endangered Cal ifornia butterfl i es (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) . Bi otop- und Artens hutz bei Schmetterl ingen. G. Schmid (ed .). Pp. 79-96 Arnold, R. A. 1981b. Captive breeding of the endangered Lange's metalmark butterfly, Apodemia mormo langei. Final rept. to L1.S. Fish and Wild. Service. 11 pp. Barbour, M. G., and J. Wajor. 1977. Terrestrial vegetation of California. Pp. 306-307. Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. dos Passos, C. F. 1964. A synonymic 1 i st of the nearctic Rhopalocera. Lepid. Soc. Memoir No. 1. 145 pp.
Downey, J. C. 1975. Genus Plebejus Kluk. - In W. H. Howe (ed.). The butterfl ies of North America. P. 337. Doubl eday and Co., Inc., Garden City, N.Y. Howe, W. H. (ed.). 1975. The butterflies of North America. Doubleday and Co.,, Garden City, N.Y. 633 pp. Lintner. A. 1876. 30th Rept. New York State Mus. Nat. Hist. P. 169. Munz, P. A., and D. D. Keck. 1968. A California flora. Univ. of Cal ifornia Press, Berkeley. 1681 pp. +224 pp. suppl . Nabokov, V. 1949. The nearctic members of the genus Lycaeides. Hubner (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) . Bull. Mus . Comp. Zoo1 . Harvard 101:479-541. Smith, J. P., Jr., R. J. Cole, J. 0. Sawyer, Jr., and W. R. Powell. 1980. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. Calif. Native Plant Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 1 (2nd ed.). 115 pp. Tilden, J. hf. 1965. Butterfl ies of the San Francisco Pay region. Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley. 88 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Recovery plan for Palos Verdes blue butterfly (Gl aucopsyche lygdamus pal osverdesensis). U. 5. Fish and Wildlife Service. Portland, OR. 46 pp.
Page 3 and 4: Approved : LOTIS BLUE BUTTERFLY REC
Page 5 and 6: Executive Summary 1. Point or condi
Page 7: TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I INTRODUCTI
Page 10 and 11: presents. information on the lotis
Page 12 and 13: Table 1 Suspected food plants of se
Page 14 and 15: include -pygmy cypress (Cupressus p
Page 16 and 17: krgure 1. Historic Co99ects'on of L
Page 18 and 19: Larval &uelopment is general ly com
Page 20 and 21: Logging of the forest may also affe
Page 22 and 23: delisting. The restricted current r
Page 24 and 25: 14. Survey known LRB colony(ies) ha
Page 26 and 27: 4. Develop publ ic awareness of LBB
Page 28 and 29: 11. Conduct vegation studies at col
Page 30 and 31: 13. Devel op and impl ement managem
Page 32 and 33: a1 so should be consul ted for reco
Page 34 and 35: difficult because the species is sc
Page 36 and 37: developed for two endangered butter
Page 38 and 39: Following achievement of interim ob
Page 40 and 41: collections made at the present sit
Page 42 and 43: 53. Enforce all laws prohibiting th
Page 46 and 47: Part I11 Imp1 ementation Schedule T
Page 48 and 49: PART I I1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE L
Page 50 and 51: PART 111 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE LO
Page 52 and 53: PART I11 IMPLEMENTAT ION SCHEDULE L
Page 54: PART IV Appendix Agencies Asked for

Lotis Blue Butterfly Recovery Plan - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?