- Page 1: A1(T) Elkesley JunctionImprovements
- Page 6: km 2Kilometres squaredLAQMLocal Air
- Page 9 and 10: L 10 hourly dB(A)L AeqL A1(T)0,18hL
- Page 11 and 12: Wildlife CorridorsZone of Visual In
- Page 13 and 14: 5.4 Assessment of Environmental Imp
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction and Background1.1 Intr
- Page 17 and 18: 1.5 Scope of AssessmentThe followin
- Page 19 and 20: 2 Development of the Preferred Opti
- Page 21 and 22: In 2007 a simpler scheme was develo
- Page 23 and 24: It is anticipated that these amendm
- Page 25 and 26: 3 Air Quality3.1 Findings at Stage
- Page 27 and 28: Policy 6/12Permission will not be g
- Page 29 and 30: Table 4.3: Significance of Effects
- Page 31 and 32: Assessment of Environmental Effects
- Page 33 and 34: 5 Disruption Due to Construction5.1
- Page 35 and 36: 5.6 Residual EffectsDisruption duri
- Page 37 and 38: 7 Landscape Effects7.1 Assessment M
- Page 39 and 40: Table 7.1: Landscape Character Sens
- Page 41 and 42: Inclusion of an area within the vis
- Page 43 and 44: MagnitudeHighMediumLowNo ChangeDefi
- Page 45 and 46: • rolling landforms with numerous
- Page 47 and 48: associated with Jockey Lane forms a
- Page 49 and 50: • Properties along the High Stree
- Page 51 and 52: 7.5 Implication of New Lighting Pro
- Page 53 and 54: Area F: Enclosed Arable Farmland (G
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 7.7: Summary of Impacts on Vi
- Page 57 and 58:
Discussion of Impacts:Visual effect
- Page 59 and 60:
• To optimise protection for resi
- Page 61 and 62:
Detailed Mitigation ProposalsThe fo
- Page 63 and 64:
8 Land Use8.1 Findings at Stage 2 A
- Page 65 and 66:
The frequency response of the human
- Page 67 and 68:
oad traffic. It does not provide pr
- Page 69 and 70:
The results of the Scoping Assessme
- Page 71 and 72:
operations. If the total noise leve
- Page 73 and 74:
Table 9.4 - Significance criteria o
- Page 75 and 76:
noise levels are below 58 dB LA1(T)
- Page 77 and 78:
climate for a typical day on the ex
- Page 79 and 80:
identified receptors within the stu
- Page 81 and 82:
presented are also based upon a 100
- Page 83 and 84:
Operational PhaseTable 9.9 and Tabl
- Page 85 and 86:
Table 9.11 - Predicted noise levels
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 9.14 - Predicted number of dw
- Page 89 and 90:
Air-borne vibration is more common
- Page 91 and 92:
10 Pedestrians, Cyclists, Equestria
- Page 93 and 94:
12 Road Drainage and the Water Envi
- Page 95 and 96:
LowAttribute with a low quality and
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 12.3 Criteria for Estimating
- Page 99 and 100:
Table 12.5: Water Framework Directi
- Page 101 and 102:
The greatest potential remains the
- Page 103 and 104:
13 Geology and Soils13.1 Findings a
- Page 105 and 106:
Annex 4Figure 4.1 - Constraints Map
- Page 107 and 108:
Annex 9Figure 3.1 - 3.9: Noise Cont
- Page 109:
Annex 12Figure 12.1 - Groundwater V