A1(T) Elkesley Junction Improvements - Highways Agency
A1(T) Elkesley Junction Improvements - Highways Agency A1(T) Elkesley Junction Improvements - Highways Agency
If significant remains are encountered full scale excavation would be necessary inorder to deal with them appropriately. This will be done in consultation with EnglishHeritage and the County Archaeologist.Post excavation work would entail processing and analysis of all data retrievedtogether with the production and publication of a specialist report.4.7 Residual EffectsThere would be no residual effects as all archaeological deposits encountered wouldbe mitigated through preservation by record.32
5 Disruption Due to Construction5.1 Assessment MethodologyThis section of the report addresses the potential effects of the Preferred Version onpeople and the environment during the construction phase. The main potentialenvironmental impacts associated with the construction of the Preferred Version areanticipated to be associated with dust, noise, visual intrusion, disruption to roadusers, residents and import and disposal of fill and excavate respectively. There isalso the likelihood of damage to buried archaeology and disruption to agriculturalaccess.5.2 Baseline ConditionsThe assessment has been undertaken in accordance with the methodology outlinedin the DMRB Volume 11: Section 3: Part 3, published by the HA. The impact ofconstruction on archaeology, noise and vibration landscape and water resources areincluded under each topic contained within the report.Therefore the assessment in this chapter focuses on the following sensitive receptorswithin 100 m of the Preferred Version corridor:• 68 residential properties within 100 m of the Preferred Version. No sensitivereceptors (e.g. schools, hospitals);• and a row of garages on Coalpit Lane representing commercial land use.5.3 Potential ImpactsPotential impacts have considered those resulting in short-term temporary effectsexperienced over the 15 month construction phase starting in 2010 and those longertermor permanent effects extending over onto the operational phase.5.4 Assessment of Environmental ImpactsAccess and Journey TimesThe implementation of traffic management throughout the construction period wouldresult in temporary adverse impact on local residents, commercial properties androad users. .All deliveries to site would be off the main carriageway only. During the construction,there would be some disruption to normal movement along Coalpit Lane during itswidening. This would be particularly disruptive to local residents in the Pepperly Riseresidential area.Also the gaps in the central reserve are to be closed at the beginning of theconstruction works, and under the traffic management provisions, narrow laneswould be in operation throughout.Commercial LossThe identified A row of garages would be demolished under the scheme proposals.need to be demolished to allow for the construction of the A1(T) / Coalpit Lane link ofthe preferred scheme.33
- Page 1: A1(T) Elkesley JunctionImprovements
- Page 4 and 5: Document ControlProject Title:Docum
- Page 6: km 2Kilometres squaredLAQMLocal Air
- Page 9 and 10: L 10 hourly dB(A)L AeqL A1(T)0,18hL
- Page 11 and 12: Wildlife CorridorsZone of Visual In
- Page 13 and 14: 5.4 Assessment of Environmental Imp
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction and Background1.1 Intr
- Page 17 and 18: 1.5 Scope of AssessmentThe followin
- Page 19 and 20: 2 Development of the Preferred Opti
- Page 21 and 22: In 2007 a simpler scheme was develo
- Page 23 and 24: It is anticipated that these amendm
- Page 25 and 26: 3 Air Quality3.1 Findings at Stage
- Page 27 and 28: Policy 6/12Permission will not be g
- Page 29 and 30: Table 4.3: Significance of Effects
- Page 31: Assessment of Environmental Effects
- Page 35 and 36: 5.6 Residual EffectsDisruption duri
- Page 37 and 38: 7 Landscape Effects7.1 Assessment M
- Page 39 and 40: Table 7.1: Landscape Character Sens
- Page 41 and 42: Inclusion of an area within the vis
- Page 43 and 44: MagnitudeHighMediumLowNo ChangeDefi
- Page 45 and 46: • rolling landforms with numerous
- Page 47 and 48: associated with Jockey Lane forms a
- Page 49 and 50: • Properties along the High Stree
- Page 51 and 52: 7.5 Implication of New Lighting Pro
- Page 53 and 54: Area F: Enclosed Arable Farmland (G
- Page 55 and 56: Table 7.7: Summary of Impacts on Vi
- Page 57 and 58: Discussion of Impacts:Visual effect
- Page 59 and 60: • To optimise protection for resi
- Page 61 and 62: Detailed Mitigation ProposalsThe fo
- Page 63 and 64: 8 Land Use8.1 Findings at Stage 2 A
- Page 65 and 66: The frequency response of the human
- Page 67 and 68: oad traffic. It does not provide pr
- Page 69 and 70: The results of the Scoping Assessme
- Page 71 and 72: operations. If the total noise leve
- Page 73 and 74: Table 9.4 - Significance criteria o
- Page 75 and 76: noise levels are below 58 dB LA1(T)
- Page 77 and 78: climate for a typical day on the ex
- Page 79 and 80: identified receptors within the stu
- Page 81 and 82: presented are also based upon a 100
If significant remains are encountered full scale excavation would be necessary inorder to deal with them appropriately. This will be done in consultation with EnglishHeritage and the County Archaeologist.Post excavation work would entail processing and analysis of all data retrievedtogether with the production and publication of a specialist report.4.7 Residual EffectsThere would be no residual effects as all archaeological deposits encountered wouldbe mitigated through preservation by record.32
Change language