A1(T) Elkesley Junction Improvements - Highways Agency

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Coalpit Lane adjacent to the village, used as the main access to the village,the junction also being used by HGVs wishing to access Plevins (awood/paper processing plant.); and• the Twyford Lane slip access off the A1(T) to the east of the village.Land cover consists of medium-sized arable fields divided by well-maintainedhedges and permanent pasture along the river corridors to the south and to the eastof Elkesley.Elkesley Wood occupies the southern bank of the River Poulter to the south as itflows through a semi-natural landscape with areas of mixed plantation woodland.The landscape to the west is scattered, with regularly shaped blocks of deciduousand mixed plantation woodland planted for game and timber.18
2 Development of the Preferred Options2.1 IntroductionThe preferred strategy with any development is to avoid negative environmentalimpacts wherever possible and thereafter minimise unavoidable impacts as far aspractical. This can be achieved at an early stage of a proposed development by theconsideration of alternatives.This section describes the history of the proposed improvements to the A1(T) atElkesley and the options considered with a brief summary of why certain optionswere discounted.History of the SchemeThe junction improvements are supported by both the Local Authority and residents,who have campaigned for a bridge for a number of years. A safety scheme whichcomprised a 50mph speed limit (enforced with safety cameras) and street lightingwas introduced in 1997. This has resulted in a significant reduction in the accidentrate.Options considered in 2003Three options were considered in 2003 which, comprised the following:• Red Option;• Yellow Option; and• Blue OptionThe Red Option consisted of a new link-road to the south of the village parallel withthe A1(T). It proposed a 2-way link road from Twyford Lane crossing over the RiverPoulter to a new roundabout on the B6387.The Yellow Option proposed a link-road from the B6387 to Elkesley village butcommencing further south of the above option with Brough Lane, a local road in thevillage. This option also incorporated a crossing over the River Poulter.The Blue Option, located to the south west of Elkesley village comprised a link roadfrom Coalpit Lane to the north-west by Jockey Lane by an over-bridge. This optionalso proposed two links branching off the route to connect with the north andsouthbound carriageway of the A1 (T).All Options were rejected on the following grounds:The Red and Yellow options were rejected as they resulted in all traffic to and fromthe village (including HGVs accessing the Crookford Hill timber works) negotiatingnarrow roads at the southern end of the village. The Blue Option would haverequired construction of a bridge and approach roads on the line of Jockey Lane andSandy Lane. This would have required significant disruption by temporary diversions,19
Page 1: A1(T) Elkesley JunctionImprovements
Page 4 and 5: Document ControlProject Title:Docum
Page 6: km 2Kilometres squaredLAQMLocal Air
Page 9 and 10: L 10 hourly dB(A)L AeqL A1(T)0,18hL
Page 11 and 12: Wildlife CorridorsZone of Visual In
Page 13 and 14: 5.4 Assessment of Environmental Imp
Page 15 and 16: Introduction and Background1.1 Intr
Page 17: 1.5 Scope of AssessmentThe followin
Page 21 and 22: In 2007 a simpler scheme was develo
Page 23 and 24: It is anticipated that these amendm
Page 25 and 26: 3 Air Quality3.1 Findings at Stage
Page 27 and 28: Policy 6/12Permission will not be g
Page 29 and 30: Table 4.3: Significance of Effects
Page 31 and 32: Assessment of Environmental Effects
Page 33 and 34: 5 Disruption Due to Construction5.1
Page 35 and 36: 5.6 Residual EffectsDisruption duri
Page 37 and 38: 7 Landscape Effects7.1 Assessment M
Page 39 and 40: Table 7.1: Landscape Character Sens
Page 41 and 42: Inclusion of an area within the vis
Page 43 and 44: MagnitudeHighMediumLowNo ChangeDefi
Page 45 and 46: • rolling landforms with numerous
Page 47 and 48: associated with Jockey Lane forms a
Page 49 and 50: • Properties along the High Stree
Page 51 and 52: 7.5 Implication of New Lighting Pro
Page 53 and 54: Area F: Enclosed Arable Farmland (G
Page 55 and 56: Table 7.7: Summary of Impacts on Vi
Page 57 and 58: Discussion of Impacts:Visual effect
Page 59 and 60: • To optimise protection for resi
Page 61 and 62: Detailed Mitigation ProposalsThe fo
Page 63 and 64: 8 Land Use8.1 Findings at Stage 2 A
Page 65 and 66: The frequency response of the human
Page 67 and 68: oad traffic. It does not provide pr
Page 69 and 70:
The results of the Scoping Assessme
Page 71 and 72:
operations. If the total noise leve
Page 73 and 74:
Table 9.4 - Significance criteria o
Page 75 and 76:
noise levels are below 58 dB LA1(T)
Page 77 and 78:
climate for a typical day on the ex
Page 79 and 80:
identified receptors within the stu
Page 81 and 82:
presented are also based upon a 100
Page 83 and 84:
Operational PhaseTable 9.9 and Tabl
Page 85 and 86:
Table 9.11 - Predicted noise levels
Page 87 and 88:
Table 9.14 - Predicted number of dw
Page 89 and 90:
Air-borne vibration is more common
Page 91 and 92:
10 Pedestrians, Cyclists, Equestria
Page 93 and 94:
12 Road Drainage and the Water Envi
Page 95 and 96:
LowAttribute with a low quality and
Page 97 and 98:
Table 12.3 Criteria for Estimating
Page 99 and 100:
Table 12.5: Water Framework Directi
Page 101 and 102:
The greatest potential remains the
Page 103 and 104:
13 Geology and Soils13.1 Findings a
Page 105 and 106:
Annex 4Figure 4.1 - Constraints Map
Page 107 and 108:
Annex 9Figure 3.1 - 3.9: Noise Cont
Page 109:
Annex 12Figure 12.1 - Groundwater V
show all

A1(T) Elkesley Junction Improvements - Highways Agency

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?