A1(T) Elkesley Junction Improvements - Highways Agency

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 15 - Baseline Monitoring Data for MP2File Name Date Time L Aeq L AFmax L AFmin L Apeak L <strong>A1</strong>(T)0 L A90090319_0002.NBF 19/03/2009 10:15:00 56.1 67.7 48.1 95.7 58.0 53.1090319_0003.NBF 19/03/2009 10:30:00 55.0 62.6 48.4 75.6 57.1 51.7090319_0004.NBF 19/03/2009 10:45:00 56.7 64.0 50.6 81.2 58.6 53.8090319_0005.NBF 19/03/2009 11:00:00 56.0 66.7 47.2 80.6 58.1 52.4090319_0006.NBF 19/03/2009 11:15:00 55.5 73.6 47.5 85.7 57.5 51.5090319_0007.NBF 19/03/2009 11:30:00 54.8 61.4 48.7 77.3 56.6 51.9090319_0008.NBF 19/03/2009 11:45:00 53.4 66.5 46.5 81.3 55.7 49.6090319_0009.NBF 19/03/2009 12:00:00 57.1 86.3 47.9 107.4 58.5 50.8090319_0010.NBF 19/03/2009 12:15:00 53.0 63.9 47.2 76.6 55.2 50.0090319_0011.NBF 19/03/2009 12:30:00 53.0 68.8 48.0 80.6 54.6 50.5090319_0012.NBF 19/03/2009 12:45:00 55.7 81.4 46.9 91.6 55.7 50.8090319_0013.NBF 19/03/2009 13:00:00 55.1 61.1 49.2 82.5 57.0 52.6Over 3 hour Period55.3 86.3 46.5 107.4 56.9 51.6108
Annex 12Figure 12.1 – Groundwater Vulnerability Map.109
Page 1:
A1(T) Elkesley JunctionImprovements
Page 4 and 5:
Document ControlProject Title:Docum
Page 6:
km 2Kilometres squaredLAQMLocal Air
Page 9 and 10:
L 10 hourly dB(A)L AeqL A1(T)0,18hL
Page 11 and 12:
Wildlife CorridorsZone of Visual In
Page 13 and 14:
5.4 Assessment of Environmental Imp
Page 15 and 16:
Introduction and Background1.1 Intr
Page 17 and 18:
1.5 Scope of AssessmentThe followin
Page 19 and 20:
2 Development of the Preferred Opti
Page 21 and 22:
In 2007 a simpler scheme was develo
Page 23 and 24:
It is anticipated that these amendm
Page 25 and 26:
3 Air Quality3.1 Findings at Stage
Page 27 and 28:
Policy 6/12Permission will not be g
Page 29 and 30:
Table 4.3: Significance of Effects
Page 31 and 32:
Assessment of Environmental Effects
Page 33 and 34:
5 Disruption Due to Construction5.1
Page 35 and 36:
5.6 Residual EffectsDisruption duri
Page 37 and 38:
7 Landscape Effects7.1 Assessment M
Page 39 and 40:
Table 7.1: Landscape Character Sens
Page 41 and 42:
Inclusion of an area within the vis
Page 43 and 44:
MagnitudeHighMediumLowNo ChangeDefi
Page 45 and 46:
• rolling landforms with numerous
Page 47 and 48:
associated with Jockey Lane forms a
Page 49 and 50:
• Properties along the High Stree
Page 51 and 52:
7.5 Implication of New Lighting Pro
Page 53 and 54:
Area F: Enclosed Arable Farmland (G
Page 55 and 56:
Table 7.7: Summary of Impacts on Vi
Page 57 and 58: Discussion of Impacts:Visual effect
Page 59 and 60: • To optimise protection for resi
Page 61 and 62: Detailed Mitigation ProposalsThe fo
Page 63 and 64: 8 Land Use8.1 Findings at Stage 2 A
Page 65 and 66: The frequency response of the human
Page 67 and 68: oad traffic. It does not provide pr
Page 69 and 70: The results of the Scoping Assessme
Page 71 and 72: operations. If the total noise leve
Page 73 and 74: Table 9.4 - Significance criteria o
Page 75 and 76: noise levels are below 58 dB LA1(T)
Page 77 and 78: climate for a typical day on the ex
Page 79 and 80: identified receptors within the stu
Page 81 and 82: presented are also based upon a 100
Page 83 and 84: Operational PhaseTable 9.9 and Tabl
Page 85 and 86: Table 9.11 - Predicted noise levels
Page 87 and 88: Table 9.14 - Predicted number of dw
Page 89 and 90: Air-borne vibration is more common
Page 91 and 92: 10 Pedestrians, Cyclists, Equestria
Page 93 and 94: 12 Road Drainage and the Water Envi
Page 95 and 96: LowAttribute with a low quality and
Page 97 and 98: Table 12.3 Criteria for Estimating
Page 99 and 100: Table 12.5: Water Framework Directi
Page 101 and 102: The greatest potential remains the
Page 103 and 104: 13 Geology and Soils13.1 Findings a
Page 105 and 106: Annex 4Figure 4.1 - Constraints Map
Page 107: Annex 9Figure 3.1 - 3.9: Noise Cont
show all

A1(T) Elkesley Junction Improvements - Highways Agency

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?