- Page 1:
A1(T) Elkesley JunctionImprovements
- Page 4 and 5:
Document ControlProject Title:Docum
- Page 6:
km 2Kilometres squaredLAQMLocal Air
- Page 9 and 10:
L 10 hourly dB(A)L AeqL A1(T)0,18hL
- Page 11 and 12:
Wildlife CorridorsZone of Visual In
- Page 13 and 14:
5.4 Assessment of Environmental Imp
- Page 15 and 16:
Introduction and Background1.1 Intr
- Page 17 and 18:
1.5 Scope of AssessmentThe followin
- Page 19 and 20:
2 Development of the Preferred Opti
- Page 21 and 22:
In 2007 a simpler scheme was develo
- Page 23 and 24:
It is anticipated that these amendm
- Page 25 and 26:
3 Air Quality3.1 Findings at Stage
- Page 27 and 28:
Policy 6/12Permission will not be g
- Page 29 and 30:
Table 4.3: Significance of Effects
- Page 31 and 32:
Assessment of Environmental Effects
- Page 33 and 34:
5 Disruption Due to Construction5.1
- Page 35 and 36:
5.6 Residual EffectsDisruption duri
- Page 37 and 38:
7 Landscape Effects7.1 Assessment M
- Page 39 and 40:
Table 7.1: Landscape Character Sens
- Page 41 and 42:
Inclusion of an area within the vis
- Page 43 and 44:
MagnitudeHighMediumLowNo ChangeDefi
- Page 45 and 46:
• rolling landforms with numerous
- Page 47 and 48:
associated with Jockey Lane forms a
- Page 49 and 50:
• Properties along the High Stree
- Page 51 and 52:
7.5 Implication of New Lighting Pro
- Page 53 and 54:
Area F: Enclosed Arable Farmland (G
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 7.7: Summary of Impacts on Vi
- Page 57 and 58: Discussion of Impacts:Visual effect
- Page 59 and 60: • To optimise protection for resi
- Page 61 and 62: Detailed Mitigation ProposalsThe fo
- Page 63 and 64: 8 Land Use8.1 Findings at Stage 2 A
- Page 65 and 66: The frequency response of the human
- Page 67 and 68: oad traffic. It does not provide pr
- Page 69 and 70: The results of the Scoping Assessme
- Page 71 and 72: operations. If the total noise leve
- Page 73 and 74: Table 9.4 - Significance criteria o
- Page 75 and 76: noise levels are below 58 dB LA1(T)
- Page 77 and 78: climate for a typical day on the ex
- Page 79 and 80: identified receptors within the stu
- Page 81 and 82: presented are also based upon a 100
- Page 83 and 84: Operational PhaseTable 9.9 and Tabl
- Page 85 and 86: Table 9.11 - Predicted noise levels
- Page 87 and 88: Table 9.14 - Predicted number of dw
- Page 89 and 90: Air-borne vibration is more common
- Page 91 and 92: 10 Pedestrians, Cyclists, Equestria
- Page 93 and 94: 12 Road Drainage and the Water Envi
- Page 95 and 96: LowAttribute with a low quality and
- Page 97 and 98: Table 12.3 Criteria for Estimating
- Page 99 and 100: Table 12.5: Water Framework Directi
- Page 101 and 102: The greatest potential remains the
- Page 103 and 104: 13 Geology and Soils13.1 Findings a
- Page 105 and 106: Annex 4Figure 4.1 - Constraints Map
- Page 107: Annex 9Figure 3.1 - 3.9: Noise Cont