PATHS Final programme report: "Togetherness in Health" the Enugu ...
PATHS Final programme report: "Togetherness in Health" the Enugu ... PATHS Final programme report: "Togetherness in Health" the Enugu ...
6 PATHS Final Programme Report
SUMMARYThe PATHS programme was operational in Enugu State from 2002 to 2008 and duringthat period worked with four Health Commissioners and six Permanent Secretaries. It washoused within the State Health Board premises which did much to promote a harmoniousand cohesive working relationship with government structures. Whilst PATHS workedpredominantly with the State Ministry of Health, it also worked in partnership with anumber of other government ministries; including Local Government, Economic Planningand Finance and the Local Government Services Commission. In addition, the programmeworked with a number of faith-based hospitals; a large selection of NGOs and CBOs; and itspartner DFID programmes, particularly the State and Local Government Programme andthe Health Commodities Procurement project.The introduction of a District Health System (DHS) was at the heart of Enugu State’s health reformagenda. The vision was that a DHS would allow primary and secondary health services to beintegrated, marking an end to fragmented and inefficient service delivery. The devolution ofmanagement under the DHS was also expected to create new opportunities to revitalise poorlyfunctioning primary health care facilities.PATHS support to the State Ministry of Health (SMOH) in Enugu focused on the development andstrengthening of the underpinning systems that would allow the DHS to function. Once the basicsystems were in place, efforts turned to improving service delivery. With the support of the DFIDHealth Commodities Project, much-needed drugs and equipment were supplied to the health facilitiesthat were supported by PATHS (approximately 100 at the conclusion of the programme). A MinimumService Package, standards of care, and a Drug Revolving Fund were introduced, all of which helpedto improve service delivery and increase access. Extensive staff training, both clinical and non-clinical,was provided in 28 key areas. Approximately 2,500 staff benefited from training in Life Saving Skills(LSS), financial management systems (FMS), business planning, health management informationsystems (HMIS), and inter-personnel communication skills (IPCC), among others.Given that in 2002 the majority of patients in Enugu used private or faith-based facilities, PATHSsupported the SMOH to develop public, private partnerships in health. The provision of EmergencyObstetric Care (EOC) services by three faith-based hospitals, with funding provided by the EnuguDistrict Health Board, was pioneered under the Enugu EOC+ Pilot Scheme. Early results suggested thatthe scheme had resulted in a number of mothers’ lives being saved, and was a promising example of apublic-private partnership.PATHS also supported the SMOH and the constituent bodies of the DHS to develop partnerships withNGOs and community-based organisations, with the aim of utilising their skills, competencies andlinks with communities to create demand for services. Efforts were also made to increase communityparticipation and engagement in local service delivery. To this end, community representation on“Togetherness in Health” the Enugu Experience in Health Sector Reform, 2002-2008 7
- Page 3 and 4: "Togetherness in Health"the Enugu E
- Page 5 and 6: FORWARDI am very pleased on behalf
- Page 11 and 12: Section 1:Setting the Enugu Context
- Page 13 and 14: KEY FACTSHealth Indices: Comparison
- Page 15 and 16: PHC centres and cottage hospitals i
- Page 17 and 18: Section 2:Overview of the PATHSProg
- Page 19: Stakeholder initiatives supported b
- Page 22 and 23: PATHS ApproachEngagement Process wi
- Page 24 and 25: Pro-poor FocusPATHS pro-poor focus
- Page 26 and 27: “PATHS has indeed impacted very p
- Page 28 and 29: the 56 Executive Secretaries of Loc
- Page 30 and 31: Health Board and the Districts. The
- Page 32 and 33: it was agreed that the original ide
- Page 34 and 35: •••Working to an agreed timef
- Page 36 and 37: PATHS provided much of the infrastr
- Page 38 and 39: to access for the Ministry of Healt
- Page 40 and 41: and the core DRF models used in oth
- Page 42 and 43: Enabling Service DeliveryDeveloping
- Page 44 and 45: Procurement of Drugs and EquipmentT
- Page 46 and 47: equired in order to ensure that mor
- Page 48 and 49: Training in the laboratory of Annun
- Page 50 and 51: The services to be delivered were a
- Page 52 and 53: Where care is givenEnugu’s health
- Page 54 and 55: Enugu State Total Deliveries in Pub
- Page 56 and 57: The selection process resulted in t
SUMMARYThe <strong>PATHS</strong> <strong>programme</strong> was operational <strong>in</strong> <strong>Enugu</strong> State from 2002 to 2008 and dur<strong>in</strong>gthat period worked with four Health Commissioners and six Permanent Secretaries. It washoused with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Health Board premises which did much to promote a harmoniousand cohesive work<strong>in</strong>g relationship with government structures. Whilst <strong>PATHS</strong> workedpredom<strong>in</strong>antly with <strong>the</strong> State M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health, it also worked <strong>in</strong> partnership with anumber of o<strong>the</strong>r government m<strong>in</strong>istries; <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Local Government, Economic Plann<strong>in</strong>gand F<strong>in</strong>ance and <strong>the</strong> Local Government Services Commission. In addition, <strong>the</strong> <strong>programme</strong>worked with a number of faith-based hospitals; a large selection of NGOs and CBOs; and itspartner DFID <strong>programme</strong>s, particularly <strong>the</strong> State and Local Government Programme and<strong>the</strong> Health Commodities Procurement project.The <strong>in</strong>troduction of a District Health System (DHS) was at <strong>the</strong> heart of <strong>Enugu</strong> State’s health reformagenda. The vision was that a DHS would allow primary and secondary health services to be<strong>in</strong>tegrated, mark<strong>in</strong>g an end to fragmented and <strong>in</strong>efficient service delivery. The devolution ofmanagement under <strong>the</strong> DHS was also expected to create new opportunities to revitalise poorlyfunction<strong>in</strong>g primary health care facilities.<strong>PATHS</strong> support to <strong>the</strong> State M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health (SMOH) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Enugu</strong> focused on <strong>the</strong> development andstreng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g systems that would allow <strong>the</strong> DHS to function. Once <strong>the</strong> basicsystems were <strong>in</strong> place, efforts turned to improv<strong>in</strong>g service delivery. With <strong>the</strong> support of <strong>the</strong> DFIDHealth Commodities Project, much-needed drugs and equipment were supplied to <strong>the</strong> health facilitiesthat were supported by <strong>PATHS</strong> (approximately 100 at <strong>the</strong> conclusion of <strong>the</strong> <strong>programme</strong>). A M<strong>in</strong>imumService Package, standards of care, and a Drug Revolv<strong>in</strong>g Fund were <strong>in</strong>troduced, all of which helpedto improve service delivery and <strong>in</strong>crease access. Extensive staff tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, both cl<strong>in</strong>ical and non-cl<strong>in</strong>ical,was provided <strong>in</strong> 28 key areas. Approximately 2,500 staff benefited from tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Life Sav<strong>in</strong>g Skills(LSS), f<strong>in</strong>ancial management systems (FMS), bus<strong>in</strong>ess plann<strong>in</strong>g, health management <strong>in</strong>formationsystems (HMIS), and <strong>in</strong>ter-personnel communication skills (IPCC), among o<strong>the</strong>rs.Given that <strong>in</strong> 2002 <strong>the</strong> majority of patients <strong>in</strong> <strong>Enugu</strong> used private or faith-based facilities, <strong>PATHS</strong>supported <strong>the</strong> SMOH to develop public, private partnerships <strong>in</strong> health. The provision of EmergencyObstetric Care (EOC) services by three faith-based hospitals, with fund<strong>in</strong>g provided by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enugu</strong>District Health Board, was pioneered under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enugu</strong> EOC+ Pilot Scheme. Early results suggested that<strong>the</strong> scheme had resulted <strong>in</strong> a number of mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ lives be<strong>in</strong>g saved, and was a promis<strong>in</strong>g example of apublic-private partnership.<strong>PATHS</strong> also supported <strong>the</strong> SMOH and <strong>the</strong> constituent bodies of <strong>the</strong> DHS to develop partnerships withNGOs and community-based organisations, with <strong>the</strong> aim of utilis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir skills, competencies andl<strong>in</strong>ks with communities to create demand for services. Efforts were also made to <strong>in</strong>crease communityparticipation and engagement <strong>in</strong> local service delivery. To this end, community representation on“<strong>Toge<strong>the</strong>rness</strong> <strong>in</strong> Health” <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enugu</strong> Experience <strong>in</strong> Health Sector Reform, 2002-2008 7