12.07.2015 Views

PATHS Final programme report: "Togetherness in Health" the Enugu ...

PATHS Final programme report: "Togetherness in Health" the Enugu ...

PATHS Final programme report: "Togetherness in Health" the Enugu ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> District Health SystemWith <strong>the</strong> political commitment and active support of <strong>the</strong>State Governor, <strong>in</strong> October 2003 <strong>the</strong> State Council on Healthrecommended that <strong>the</strong> state <strong>in</strong>troduce a District Health Systemas its framework for health care delivery. In order to achieve thisvision <strong>the</strong>re was a need to move away from a centrally managedand fragmented model of health service delivery to one of<strong>in</strong>tegration at all levels of service delivery with a special emphasison management at <strong>the</strong> district level.The <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>the</strong> District Health System requiredrestructur<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health:• A new Policy Development and Plann<strong>in</strong>g Directorate (PDPD)was created, which was responsible for strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g andpolicy development;• The State Hospital Management Board evolved <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> StateHealth Board (SHB); and• Seven newly created District Health Boards (DHBs) and 56Local Health Authorities (LHAs) were established. The Boardsand Authorities were responsible for all aspects of servicedelivery.The DHS promoted:•••Decentralisation of servicesIntegration of primary and secondary servicesDelegated decision mak<strong>in</strong>g as close to <strong>the</strong> patient as possible• Increased accountability for service delivery among providersand <strong>the</strong>ir managers• Greater opportunities for public private partnerships• More effective referral systemsDevelop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>District HealthSystemStreng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gunderp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gsystemsEnabl<strong>in</strong>gservice deliveryPromot<strong>in</strong>g improvedservice delivery <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> facilitiesIncreas<strong>in</strong>g demandfrom communitiesIncreased patientpatronageReduced maternal and<strong>in</strong>fant mortality and<strong>in</strong>creased consumerdemand <strong>in</strong> both publicand private managedprimary and secondarycare facilitiesThe DHS approach was formally adopted by <strong>the</strong> State Government <strong>in</strong> January 2004, Develop<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g Districtlegislation <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> District Health System was passed by <strong>the</strong> House of Assembly Health <strong>in</strong> System August2005. While <strong>the</strong> legislation was pend<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> planned constituent bodies of <strong>the</strong> DHS were established<strong>in</strong> shadow form.Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gunderp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gOnce <strong>the</strong> State Executive Council had approved <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>the</strong> system <strong>in</strong> 2003 systems it became<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly apparent that <strong>the</strong> DHS framework needed to be sufficiently <strong>in</strong> place before efforts weremade to develop ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g systems or to improve service delivery. A considerableamount of effort was thus <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> realisation of <strong>the</strong> State vision of Enabl<strong>in</strong>g a District HealthSystem.service deliveryIn <strong>the</strong> early days of DHS implementation, <strong>the</strong> commitment and drive of some key <strong>in</strong>dividuals helped toPromot<strong>in</strong>g improvedensure positive progress. This <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n Health Commissioner, Dr FestusserviceUzor, <strong>the</strong>deliverytwo Health<strong>in</strong>Adm<strong>in</strong>istrators of <strong>the</strong> State Health Board, <strong>the</strong> seven Chief Executives of <strong>the</strong> District <strong>the</strong> Health facilities Boards and“<strong>Toge<strong>the</strong>rness</strong> <strong>in</strong> Health” <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enugu</strong> Experience <strong>in</strong> Health Sector Reform, Increas<strong>in</strong>g 2002-2008 demand 25from communities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!