Contents
Contents Contents
CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS§ 12.8 MANDATORY PROVISIONSAs references throughout the foregoing portions of this chapter indicate, thereare a variety of provisions that must appear in a CRT instrument, as a conditionof qualification of the trust under the applicable federal tax rules. Many of theseprovisions are required by the tax regulations. Others are required by variousIRS pronouncements. 384 Following the issuance of these requirements, the IRSpublished prototypes of CRTs. 385 The IRS announced that it ordinarily would notissue rulings as to the qualification of CRTs. 386Nonetheless, when a trust document contains provisions that differ from thesample provisions, the IRS is likely to rule as to whether the differing provisionsdisqualify the trust. 387 For example, the IRS will rule as to the qualification of aCRT when the income interests are measured by three lives. 388 Also, when a courtproposes to modify the provisions of a trust in an effort to qualify it as a CRT, theIRS will rule in advance as to whether the proposed judicial modifications willallow the trust to qualify. 389§ 12.9 PRIVATE FOUNDATION RULESInasmuch as CRTs are split-interest trusts, 390 they are subject to at least some of theprohibitions that are imposed on private foundations, most particularly the rulesconcerning self-dealing 391 and taxable expenditures. 392 Thus, reference to the otherprivate foundation rules is not necessary, 393 although on occasion there are referencesin the trust instrument to the private foundation law prohibitions on excessbusiness holdings 394 and jeopardizing investments. 395 In one instance, a charitableremainder trust was judicially reformed, ab initio, to remove a limitation on excessbusiness holdings; the IRS ruled that the reformation did not adversely affect thequalification of the trust. 396The interplay of the private foundation rules in the CRT context was illustratedby a private letter ruling issued by the IRS concerning a gift of a joint ventureinterest to a CRUT. 397 The donor owned an interest in and to a joint venture,384 Rev. Rul. 72-395, 1972-2 C.B. 340; Rev. Rul. 80-123, 1980-1 C.B. 205; Rev. Rul. 82-128, 1982-2 C.B. 71;Rev. Rul. 82-165, 1982-2 C.B. 117; Rev. Rul 88-81, 1988-2 C.B. 127.385 Rev. Proc. 89-20, 1989-1 C.B. 841; Rev. Proc. 89-21, 1989-1 C.B. 842; Rev. Proc. 90-30, 1990-1 C.B. 534;Rev. Proc. 90-31, 1990-1 C.B. 539; Rev. Proc. 90-32, 1990-1 C.B. 546. Most recently, the IRS provided prototypedeclarations of trust that meet the requirements of forms of CRATs. Rev. Proc. 2003-53, 2003-31 I.R.B.230 through Rev. Proc. 2003-60, 2003-31 I.R.B. 274.386 Rev. Proc. 91-3, 1991-1 C.B. 364, § 4.01(34). This non-ruling position of the IRS is also reflected in Rev. Proc.99-3, 1999-1 I.R.B. 103, § 4.01(16), (38), (43), (45). Prior to that time, the IRS issued rulings as to the qualificationof charitable remainder trusts. See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 7842062.387 See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9309029.388 See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9342026.389 See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9309034.390 IRC § 4947(a)(2); Reg. § 53.4947-1(c)(1)(ii). See Private Foundations § 3.7.391 IRC § 4941. See Private Foundations ch. 5.392 IRC § 4945. See Private Foundations ch. 9.393 Reg. §§ 1.508-2(b)(1)(vi), 1.664-1(b).394 IRC § 4943. See Private Foundations ch. 7.395 IRC § 4944. See Private Foundations ch. 8.396 Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9743004.397 Priv. Ltr. Rul. 8536061. 466
- Page 926: § 12.3 CHARITABLE REMAINDER UNITRU
- Page 930: § 12.4 ISSUESthird-party purchaser
- Page 934: § 12.4 ISSUESgratuitously and coul
- Page 938: § 12.4 ISSUES(c) Transfers of Tang
- Page 942: § 12.4 ISSUESthe noncharitable ben
- Page 946: § 12.4 ISSUESFor NICRUTs and NIMCR
- Page 950: § 12.5 TAX TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTI
- Page 954: § 12.5 TAX TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTI
- Page 958: § 12.5 TAX TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTI
- Page 962: § 12.5 TAX TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTI
- Page 966: § 12.5 TAX TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTI
- Page 970: § 12.6 EARLY TERMINATIONS OF CHARI
- Page 974: § 12.7 TAXATION OF CHARITABLE REMA
- Page 980: CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTSrespect
- Page 984: CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTSEXAMPLE
- Page 988: CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTSEXAMPLE
- Page 992: CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTSEXAMPLE
- Page 996: CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS(c) Qual
- Page 1000: § 13.1 DEFINITIONSPOOLED INCOME FU
- Page 1004: POOLED INCOME FUNDSincome interest
- Page 1008: POOLED INCOME FUNDSA national organ
- Page 1012: POOLED INCOME FUNDSThe amount so se
- Page 1016: POOLED INCOME FUNDSEXAMPLE 13.2On J
- Page 1020: POOLED INCOME FUNDSConcurrently wit
- Page 1024: POOLED INCOME FUNDS(GAAP), the trus
CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS§ 12.8 MANDATORY PROVISIONSAs references throughout the foregoing portions of this chapter indicate, thereare a variety of provisions that must appear in a CRT instrument, as a conditionof qualification of the trust under the applicable federal tax rules. Many of theseprovisions are required by the tax regulations. Others are required by variousIRS pronouncements. 384 Following the issuance of these requirements, the IRSpublished prototypes of CRTs. 385 The IRS announced that it ordinarily would notissue rulings as to the qualification of CRTs. 386Nonetheless, when a trust document contains provisions that differ from thesample provisions, the IRS is likely to rule as to whether the differing provisionsdisqualify the trust. 387 For example, the IRS will rule as to the qualification of aCRT when the income interests are measured by three lives. 388 Also, when a courtproposes to modify the provisions of a trust in an effort to qualify it as a CRT, theIRS will rule in advance as to whether the proposed judicial modifications willallow the trust to qualify. 389§ 12.9 PRIVATE FOUNDATION RULESInasmuch as CRTs are split-interest trusts, 390 they are subject to at least some of theprohibitions that are imposed on private foundations, most particularly the rulesconcerning self-dealing 391 and taxable expenditures. 392 Thus, reference to the otherprivate foundation rules is not necessary, 393 although on occasion there are referencesin the trust instrument to the private foundation law prohibitions on excessbusiness holdings 394 and jeopardizing investments. 395 In one instance, a charitableremainder trust was judicially reformed, ab initio, to remove a limitation on excessbusiness holdings; the IRS ruled that the reformation did not adversely affect thequalification of the trust. 396The interplay of the private foundation rules in the CRT context was illustratedby a private letter ruling issued by the IRS concerning a gift of a joint ventureinterest to a CRUT. 397 The donor owned an interest in and to a joint venture,384 Rev. Rul. 72-395, 1972-2 C.B. 340; Rev. Rul. 80-123, 1980-1 C.B. 205; Rev. Rul. 82-128, 1982-2 C.B. 71;Rev. Rul. 82-165, 1982-2 C.B. 117; Rev. Rul 88-81, 1988-2 C.B. 127.385 Rev. Proc. 89-20, 1989-1 C.B. 841; Rev. Proc. 89-21, 1989-1 C.B. 842; Rev. Proc. 90-30, 1990-1 C.B. 534;Rev. Proc. 90-31, 1990-1 C.B. 539; Rev. Proc. 90-32, 1990-1 C.B. 546. Most recently, the IRS provided prototypedeclarations of trust that meet the requirements of forms of CRATs. Rev. Proc. 2003-53, 2003-31 I.R.B.230 through Rev. Proc. 2003-60, 2003-31 I.R.B. 274.386 Rev. Proc. 91-3, 1991-1 C.B. 364, § 4.01(34). This non-ruling position of the IRS is also reflected in Rev. Proc.99-3, 1999-1 I.R.B. 103, § 4.01(16), (38), (43), (45). Prior to that time, the IRS issued rulings as to the qualificationof charitable remainder trusts. See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 7842062.387 See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9309029.388 See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9342026.389 See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9309034.390 IRC § 4947(a)(2); Reg. § 53.4947-1(c)(1)(ii). See Private Foundations § 3.7.391 IRC § 4941. See Private Foundations ch. 5.392 IRC § 4945. See Private Foundations ch. 9.393 Reg. §§ 1.508-2(b)(1)(vi), 1.664-1(b).394 IRC § 4943. See Private Foundations ch. 7.395 IRC § 4944. See Private Foundations ch. 8.396 Priv. Ltr. Rul. 9743004.397 Priv. Ltr. Rul. 8536061. 466