Chemistry Journal <strong>of</strong> Moldova. N. Kulikov General, et al./Chem.J.Mold. Industrial and 2008, Ecological 3 (1), 67-69 Chemistry. 2008, 3 (1), 67-69THE INFLUENCE OF BINDING MATERIAL ON POROUS STRUCTUREOF SHAPED HOPCALITEN.K. Kulikov a , S.G. Kireev a , A.O. Shevchenko a , V.M. Mukhin a , S.N. Tkachenko b , T.G. Lupascu cJSC EHMZ, Elektrostal, Moscow region, 144001, K.Marks str., 1aJSC ENPO “Neorganika”, Elektrostal, Moscow region, 144001, K.Marks str.,4bMSU by M.V. Lomonosov, Chemistry faculty, MoscowcInstitute <strong>of</strong> Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences MoldovaAbstract: The authors have investigated the equilibrated adsorption <strong>of</strong> water vapors on GFG hopcalite, which wasobtained using the extrusion shaping method, with bentonite clay as the binding compound. In the frames <strong>of</strong> the BETmodel, the values <strong>of</strong> the monolayer capacity and the size <strong>of</strong> medium area occupied by the water molecule in the filledmonolayer have been determined. The distribution <strong>of</strong> pores according to their sizes has been evaluated. It has beenestablished that the modification <strong>of</strong> the bentonitic clay allows directed construction <strong>of</strong> the hopcalite porous structure,i.e. the formation <strong>of</strong> the mesoporous structure with a narrow distribution <strong>of</strong> the pores capacities by sizes, which wasachieved varying the sizes <strong>of</strong> binding compound particles.Keywords: bentonitic clay, hopcalite, adsorption, porosity, catalytic properties.It is known that physical-chemical properties <strong>of</strong> manganese oxide catalysts (MOC) that are used for oxidation<strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide and ozone decomposition, greatly depend on the base phase structure – manganese dioxide andalso on the method and conditions <strong>of</strong> the latter receiving [1,2]. Besides, catalyst properties may be also influenced bythe binding material. For example, the use <strong>of</strong> different binding materials in shaped catalysts produced on the basison MnO 2/CuO determines different adsorption properties, in particular in connection with water vapors. So, in case<strong>of</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> bentonitic clay (BC), talum and calcium oxide the value <strong>of</strong> monolayer capacity according to BET iscorrespondingly [3] 40, 38 and 24 mmole/g.During the present work we investigated the influence <strong>of</strong> properties <strong>of</strong> one and the same binding materialon adsorption properties <strong>of</strong> hopcalite, consisting <strong>of</strong> MnO 2/CuO and 10% by weight <strong>of</strong> BC. The following sampleswere chosen as investigation objects: industrial hopcalite GFG as the a control and modified hopcalite GFG-M for adevelopment type. The samples used as investigation objects differed in binding particles size: maximum distributiontreatment was 12 m for GFG, 4 m for GFG-M.Bentonitic clay (BC) used as binding material in hopcalite production has complicated chemical and mineralogicalstructure [4]. One <strong>of</strong> the main minerals is montmorillonite but also quartz, amorphous aluminum silicates, hydroxidesand other compounds are present. Thus BC consists both <strong>of</strong> clayey components, providing binding properties, and cleancomponents which are catalyst ballast. Clayey fraction separation was carried out in the following way: BC hinge waspoured over with tenfold quantity <strong>of</strong> water and kept at room temperature with periodical mixing. After some astronomicaldays clayey fraction was separated from settled clean components. The final rate appeared to be ~40%, converted to drysubstance. This was followed by the mixing <strong>of</strong> manganese dioxide and black copper oxide with modified binder in theratio taken in active production. Subsequent operations were: forming <strong>of</strong> granules 1 mm in diameter by the extrusionmethod, drying, crushing, separation <strong>of</strong> principal fraction – cylindrical particles 2-5 mm in length and thermal treatmentat operating practice characteristics similar to those taken in hopcalite industrial production.Fig. 1. Water vapors adsorption on GFG (1) and GFG-M (2) hopcalites67
N. Kulikov et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008, 3 (1), 67-69Adsorption investigation method, equipment, way and conditions <strong>of</strong> sample training before the metrology wereanalogous to those described in the work [5].Samples specific surface was defined by means <strong>of</strong> nitrogen thermal desorption. Figure 1 shows isotherms <strong>of</strong>water vapors adsorption on GFG and GFG-M hopcalites, measured at room temperature.Both isotherms are described satisfactorily in the context <strong>of</strong> BET model [6] with the help <strong>of</strong> the calculationdevice, which determined constant C, monolayer capacity (a m) and the size <strong>of</strong> medium area occupied by the watermolecule in the filled monolayer (). All the values are given in table 1.Samples adsorption properties in the monolayer area and closest monolayer area, situated next to it, are practicallyequal, because the beginning parts <strong>of</strong> isotherms coincide, and volumes <strong>of</strong> constant C, a m, monolayer capacity and differ slightly. But at the increase <strong>of</strong> equilibrium pressure <strong>of</strong> adsorbate beginning with ~0,4 p/p o, the differences inadsorption behavior <strong>of</strong> GFG and GFG-M are evident. According to the classification <strong>of</strong> Brunauer, Deming and Tellerisotherm <strong>of</strong> sample GFG may be ascribed to II type, however for sample GFG-M in the area <strong>of</strong> high relative pressuresisotherm part is <strong>of</strong> the IV type with characteristic inflection [6] which gives the possibility to track the moment <strong>of</strong> mesoporeinfill.Table 1Hopcalite adsorption characteristicsa mS sp, m 2 \gS me, m 2 \g, in the intervalSample Cmg\g mmole\g, Å 2 3-5 nm 5-7 nm 7-16 nmGFGGFG-M424538.740/42.152.24156180Information about pore structure <strong>of</strong> the solid, for example, pore distribution according to size, may be alsoobtained from experimental isotherms. Adsorption branches <strong>of</strong> isotherms have been chosen for the calculation. First,according to the modern point <strong>of</strong> view, it is more valid in the thermodynamic respect. Second, in real adsorptionsystems there is always interrelation pore influence (unlike ideal model <strong>of</strong> separate independent pores) and distribution,measured on adsorption branch, gives more correct information about pore structure.12.113.313.726.54.17.64.21.8Fig. 2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> pore volume according to sizes for GFG (1) and GFG-M (2)On Roberts method [6] we carried out the measurement <strong>of</strong> pore distribution according sizes with the use <strong>of</strong>cylindrical pores model (fig. 2) and also <strong>of</strong> pore surface area in the range <strong>of</strong> 3-16 nm (table 1). To calculate adsorptionfilm thickness we used Helsy equation [7]. The data given on fig. 2 and in the last three columns <strong>of</strong> table 1 are theevidence <strong>of</strong> great influence <strong>of</strong> binding material modification on GFG pore structure. If at 6-7 nm you can observe ratherweak wave at distribution curve for initial hopcalite, then GFG-M at 3.8 nm is characterized by manifestly evident andrather intensive distribution maximum. Taking into account the form variety <strong>of</strong> making hopcalite particles and alsothe irregular nature <strong>of</strong> their arrangement, we can assume that the most likely reason <strong>of</strong> such effect is not only anotherbinding material pore size but also the motive change <strong>of</strong> adsorbent gel-forming particles arrangement.Actually, on one hand, the separation <strong>of</strong> clayey fraction from initial BC led to great decrease <strong>of</strong> binding materialparticle size as a result <strong>of</strong> swelling and aliquation. But on the other hand, for all that total quantity <strong>of</strong> binding materialas in GFG, the use <strong>of</strong> modified BC in GFG-M provides 2.5 times more <strong>of</strong> clayey fraction which is just a bindingcomponent. This is confirmed by the fact that granules abrasion resistance is 77.8 and 85.2% for GFG and GFG-M68
- Page 7:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Gener
- Page 10:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Gener
- Page 14 and 15:
Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 16 and 17:
Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 20 and 21: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 22 and 23: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 24 and 25: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 26 and 27: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 28 and 29: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 30 and 31: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 32 and 33: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Ion D
- Page 34 and 35: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 36 and 37: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 38 and 39: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 40 and 41: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 42 and 43: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 44 and 45: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 46 and 47: M. Revenco et al./Chem.J. Mold. 200
- Page 48 and 49: M. Revenco et al./Chem.J. Mold. 200
- Page 50 and 51: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 52 and 53: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 54 and 55: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 56 and 57: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 58 and 59: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 60 and 61: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 62 and 63: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 64 and 65: V. Mukhin et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 66 and 67: V. Mukhin et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 70 and 71: N. Kulikov et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 72 and 73: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 74 and 75: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 76 and 77: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 78 and 79: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. R. St
- Page 80 and 81: R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 82 and 83: R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 84 and 85: R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 86 and 87: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. V. Bo
- Page 88 and 89: V. Boldescu et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 90 and 91: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. I. Lu
- Page 92 and 93: I. Lunga et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 94 and 95: I. Lunga et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 96 and 97: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 98 and 99: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 100 and 101: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 102 and 103: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 104 and 105: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 106 and 107: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N.Gor
- Page 108 and 109: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 110 and 111: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 112 and 113: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 114 and 115: I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 116 and 117: I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 118 and 119:
I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 120 and 121:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 122 and 123:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 124 and 125:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 126 and 127:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 128 and 129:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N. Se
- Page 130 and 131:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. D. Ba
- Page 132 and 133:
D. Batîr/Chem.J.Mold. 2008, 3 (1),
- Page 134 and 135:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera
- Page 136 and 137:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera
- Page 138:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera