M. Revenco et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1), 44-47The reason for selecting these ions was their presence in the environment when (in drinking water, fertilizers,fountain waters, industrial effluents, soils, etc.). The proposed electrode doesn’t demonstrate a significant deviation-in the selectivity from the H<strong>of</strong>meister series ClO 4> I - > SCN - > Br - -> BF 4> Cl - > CH 3COO - 2-> SO 4> F - . The maininterfering anions were found to be perchlorate, iodide and thiocyanate and this selectivity is similar to commercialnitrat selective electrode [2].Analytical application, table 3To assess the applicability <strong>of</strong> the proposed electrode for the analysis <strong>of</strong> the real samples, an attempt was made todetermine nitrate contents in fertilizer – ammonium nitrate.Direct potentiometry – before use, ISE3 was calibrated by measuring a series <strong>of</strong> known standard solutions (6)in the conditions <strong>of</strong> constant ionic strength ensured by sodium sulfate solution 0,1 M. The equation <strong>of</strong> the calibrationE x= 56,19(-logC x) + 139,33, where E xis measured potential (mV), C x– concentration (mol/l). A known mass <strong>of</strong>fertilizer was dissolved in a volumetric flask <strong>of</strong> 100 cm 3 and adjusted to the mark with distilled water. Using ISE3 andthe above mentioned galvanic cell, the potential E xwas measured. The concentration <strong>of</strong> the nitrate was calculated usingthe equation <strong>of</strong> the calibration curve. The values <strong>of</strong> E xand the calculated concentration are given in the table 3.Table 3Determination <strong>of</strong> nitrate in fertilizer - NH 4NO 3Concentration, mol/l (NH 4NO 3), %m(fertilizer), gE x,mV C(NO 3-) pot C(NH 4+) tit potentiometry titrimetry0,1524 2370,018270,0182 95,9295,602380,0175692,190,1770 234 0,02066 0,0211 93,38 95,370,1135 2440,013720,0134 96,7094,422450,0131692,72average 94,2±1,7 95,1±0,4For comparison and confirmation <strong>of</strong> the potentiometric data the determination <strong>of</strong> the using the titrimetric method.A aliquot <strong>of</strong> the solution containing NH 4+was made basic, and the liberated NH 3was distilled into receiver containinga known amount <strong>of</strong> H 2SO 4. Unreacted acid was then titrated with standard NaOH solution [11]. The results recorded bythe potentiometric method agree reasonably well with those obtained using titrimetry. The advantage <strong>of</strong> potentiometricmethod consists in the short time spent for analysis and reliable results.ConclusionThe reaction <strong>of</strong> the triaqua-hexapivalato-tri--oxo-trichromium(III) nitrate with 4,4’-bipyridyl in situ during theformation <strong>of</strong> the plastisized PVC membrane gives rise to a nitrate potentiometric sensor with good operating characteristics(sensitivity, stability, life time and response time), able to be used for potentiometric determination <strong>of</strong> this ion.References[1] Braven J., Ebdon L., Scholefield D. High-performance nitrate-selective electrodes containing immobilized aminoacid betaines as sensors. Anal. Chem., 2002 Jun, V 74, p. 2596-2602.[2] Asgari A., Amini M., Mansour H. Nitrate-selective membrane electrode based on bis(2-hydroxyanil)acetylacetonelead(II) neutral carrier. Analytical Sciences, 2003 august, V 19, p. 1121-1125.[3] Kong Thoo L., Araujo A., Montenegro M. New PVC nitrat-selective electrode: aplication to vegetable and mineralwaters. Agric. Food Chem., 2005 Jan, V 26, p. 211-216.[4] Bendikov T., Harmon T. A sensitive nitrate ion-selective electrode from a pencil lead. Journal <strong>of</strong> ChemicalEducation, 2005 March, V 82, p. 439.[5] Ortuno J., Exposito R., Sanchez-Pedreno C. A nitrate-selective electrode based on a tris(2-aminoethyl)aminetriamide derivative receptor. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004 november, V 525, p. 231-237.[6] Revenco M., Martin M. Noi materiale electroactive pentru membranele senzorilor poteniometrici. Analeletiinifice ale Universitii de Stat din Moldova, Seria „tiine reale”, Lucrri de sintez 1996-2006, Chiinu,2006, p.90-97.[7] Wael Ahmad Abu Dayyih. Potentiometric sensors based on polynuclear complex compounds for determination <strong>of</strong>some drug-substances. Ph.D. Thesis, State University <strong>of</strong> Moldova, Chisinau, 2002.[8] Revenco M., Martin M. Senzori poteniometrici pentru determinarea perclorailor. Analele tiinifice ale Universitiide Stat din Moldova, Seria „tiine chimico-biologice”, Chiinu, 2006, p.480-483.[9] Simonov Yu., Bourosh P., Timco G. Synthesis , structure and mass-spectrometric-investigation <strong>of</strong> chromium trinuclear-oxo-carboxylates. Chem. Bull., Romania 1998, V 43, p. 128-136.[10] . , :, 1980, 283 c.[11] Harris D. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, New York, Freeman and Company 1998, p.1025.47
Chemistry Journal <strong>of</strong> Moldova. Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. General, Industrial Mold. and 2008, Ecological 3 (1), 48-51 Chemistry. 2008, 3 (1), 48-51CONSIDERATIONS ON LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC SEPARATIONFOR AN EQUI MO LAR MIXTURE OF2,4-DINITROPHENYLHYDRA ZO NES OF ACETALDEHYDE ANDDIACETYLGheorghe ZghereaDepartment <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Sciences, University “Dunrea de Jos” <strong>of</strong> Galai111 Domneasc street, 800.201 Galai, Romania, phone +40 236 414871, fax +40 236 461353gzgherea@chem.ugal.roAbstract: An equimolar mixture <strong>of</strong> 2.4-dinitrophenylhidrazones (2.4DNPH-ones) providing by acetaldehyde anddiacetyl must be analyzed by liquid-chromatographic separation, using the mechanism <strong>of</strong> repartition with reversephase; that full papers is for identification the optimal analytical conditions. As mobile phase are utilized variousbinary mixtures eluent, containing water and methanol, with 0-45% water. By the experimental studies wereidentified four domains <strong>of</strong> behavior and two optimal binary mixtures, with 25% and 45% water, thus this is a studyon the behavior <strong>of</strong> binary mixtures mobile phases. The peaks are characterized by values <strong>of</strong> retention times andby position. The separation processes were appreciated by difference between the retention times <strong>of</strong> peaks; if thepercent <strong>of</strong> water increase, the values <strong>of</strong> retention times is higher. When the percent <strong>of</strong> water is 45%, the differencebetween the retention times is maxim, associated with a change <strong>of</strong> peaks position.Keywords: acetaldehyde, diacetyl, reverses phase, polarity, percent <strong>of</strong> water, inversion <strong>of</strong> position.IntroductionAny foods obtained by fermentation have small quantities <strong>of</strong> carbonyl compounds. They have a very importantcontribution to the flavor and the fragrance; between these compounds there are acetaldehyde and diacetyl. On considerthat the diacetyl is the vicinal dicetone with a very important contribution at the sensorial properties <strong>of</strong> beer. In addition,his concentration in beer (0.01-0.2 mg·L -1 ) is a reference values for the level <strong>of</strong> oxidative process during preparativeprocess. That explains the major preoccupations on the physical-<strong>chemistry</strong> methods to identification and to dose beer’sdiacetyl. Between these methods there is the distillation <strong>of</strong> carbonyl compounds and transfer in a strong acid solution <strong>of</strong>2.4-dini tro phe nyl hi dra zi ne; the mixture <strong>of</strong> insoluble precipitates <strong>of</strong> 2.4-DNPH-ones is separated by filtration, washedwith bidistilate water, dried and solved in organic solvent (methanol, acetonitrile, tetrahydr<strong>of</strong>uran), followed by anappro priate liquid-chromatographic separation.The described analytical method may be use for any mixture <strong>of</strong> carbonyl compounds. The 2.4-DNPH-ones aresolid substances, yellows, soluble in organic solvents [1]. The literature doesn’t have specific reference about theirpolarity [2-3]; may be compared only the polarity values for carbonyl compounds providers.After their behaviors, the mixtures <strong>of</strong> 2.4-DNPH-ones may be analyzed by HPLC, using the mechanism <strong>of</strong>repartition with reverse phase; may be used a slightly polar stationary phase (octadecysilan) and a mixture <strong>of</strong> mobilephase containing water (strongly polar solvent) with a slightly organic solvent [4-7]. The no polar stationary phaseassures a strongly retaining <strong>of</strong> slightly polar molecules <strong>of</strong> 2.4DNPH-ones. The no polar mobile phases provides a bettersolu bi li sa tion <strong>of</strong> 2.4DNPH-ones, assuring a better mass transfer between the mobile and stationary phase; thus, thepeak are symmetrically, narrows and with small values <strong>of</strong> retention times. The polar mobile phase provides a smallsolubilisation and a hard mass transfer between the phases; the peaks are asymmetrically and with higher values <strong>of</strong>retention times. Therefore, a higher resolution between peaks is assured only by optimal mixture <strong>of</strong> mobile phase, whenthe difference between retention time values is maxim, for the adjacent peaks.In the upper case, analytical difficulties are generating by the similar behavior <strong>of</strong> 2.4DNPH-ones providing bydiacetyl (2.4-DNPD) and acetaldehyde (2.4-DNPHAA). Must be established the optimal mixture <strong>of</strong> mobile phase (withwater and methanol) to assure the best separation for an equimolar mixture (a model synthetic mixture) <strong>of</strong> the two2.4-DNPH-ones.ResultsTen chromatograms were obtained. Each chromatogram has two chromatographic signals (peak); the identity <strong>of</strong>signals was verified by addition method.The behavior <strong>of</strong> eluent (methanol or mixtures <strong>of</strong> mobile phase) was appreciate by difference between the values<strong>of</strong> re ten tion times <strong>of</strong> 2.4DNPH-ones48
- Page 7: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Gener
- Page 10: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Gener
- Page 14 and 15: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 16 and 17: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 20 and 21: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 22 and 23: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 24 and 25: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 26 and 27: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 28 and 29: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 30 and 31: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 32 and 33: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Ion D
- Page 34 and 35: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 36 and 37: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 38 and 39: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 40 and 41: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 42 and 43: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 44 and 45: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 46 and 47: M. Revenco et al./Chem.J. Mold. 200
- Page 50 and 51: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 52 and 53: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 54 and 55: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 56 and 57: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 58 and 59: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 60 and 61: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 62 and 63: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 64 and 65: V. Mukhin et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 66 and 67: V. Mukhin et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 68 and 69: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N. Ku
- Page 70 and 71: N. Kulikov et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 72 and 73: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 74 and 75: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 76 and 77: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 78 and 79: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. R. St
- Page 80 and 81: R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 82 and 83: R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 84 and 85: R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 86 and 87: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. V. Bo
- Page 88 and 89: V. Boldescu et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 90 and 91: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. I. Lu
- Page 92 and 93: I. Lunga et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 94 and 95: I. Lunga et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 96 and 97: N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 98 and 99:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 100 and 101:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 102 and 103:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 104 and 105:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 106 and 107:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N.Gor
- Page 108 and 109:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 110 and 111:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 112 and 113:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 114 and 115:
I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 116 and 117:
I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 118 and 119:
I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 120 and 121:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 122 and 123:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 124 and 125:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 126 and 127:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 128 and 129:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N. Se
- Page 130 and 131:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. D. Ba
- Page 132 and 133:
D. Batîr/Chem.J.Mold. 2008, 3 (1),
- Page 134 and 135:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera
- Page 136 and 137:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera
- Page 138:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera