Chemistry Journal <strong>of</strong> Moldova. Ion Dranca/Chem.J. General, Industrial Mold. and 2008, Ecological 3 (1), 31-43 Chemistry. 2008, 3 (1), 31-43VARIATION IN ACTIVATION ENERGY AND NANOSCALECHARACTERISTIC LENGTH AT THE GLASS TRANSITIONIon DrancaChemistry Institute, Moldova Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences3 Academiei Str., Chisinau MD2028, Moldovadrancai@yahoo.com; Tel. 37322 72 54 90 Fax.37322 73 98 54Current address: Department <strong>of</strong> Pharmaceutics, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, 55455, USAAbstract: Differential scanning calorimetry has been used to study the -relaxation (glass transition) in virginpolystyrene (PS), PS-clay nanocomposite, amorphous indomethacin (IM), maltitol (Mt) and glucose (Gl). Variation<strong>of</strong> the effective activation energy (E) throughout the glass transition has been determined by applying an advancedisoconversional method to DSC data on the glass transition. The relaxations have been characterized by determiningthe effective activation energies (E) and evaluating the sizes <strong>of</strong> cooperatively rearranging regions at the glasstransition (V g). The values <strong>of</strong> V ghave been determined from the heat capacity data. The -relaxation demonstratesmarkedly larger values <strong>of</strong> E (~340 vs ~270 kJ mol -1 ) for the PS-clay system than for virgin PS. For IM in the glasstransition region, the effective activation energy <strong>of</strong> relaxation decreases with increasing temperature from 320 to160 kJ mol -1 . In the T gregion E decreases (from~250 to ~150 kJ mol -1 in maltitol and from~220 to ~170 kJ mol -1in glucose) with increasing T as typically found for the -relaxation. It has been found that in the sub-T gregion Edecreases with decreasing T reaching the values ~60 (glucose) and ~70 (maltitol) kJ -1 that are comparable to theliterature values <strong>of</strong> the activation energies for the -relaxation. Heat capacity measurements have allowed for theevaluation <strong>of</strong> the cooperatively rearranging region in terms <strong>of</strong> the linear size The PS-clay system has also been foundto have a significantly larger value <strong>of</strong> V g, 36.7 nm 3 as compared to 20.9 nm 3 for PS. Heat capacity measurements <strong>of</strong>IM have allowed for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the cooperatively rearranging region (CRR) in term <strong>of</strong> linear size (3.4 nm) andthe number <strong>of</strong> molecules (90). The size <strong>of</strong> CRR have been determined as 3.1 (maltitol) and 3.3 (glucose) nm.Keywords: activation energy; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); - and -relaxation; advanced isoconversionalmethod; kinetics (polym. and pharm.).IntroductionDifferential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a major tool for measuring the glass transition or, so-called,-relaxations in polymer systems [1]. In particular, it has been successfully employed to explore glass transition invarious nanostructured polymer systems, including thin films [2,3] and polymers confined to nanopores [4,5]. In DSC,the glass transition shows up as a heat capacity step. An increase in the heating rate q causes this step to shift to a highertemperature. This effect is used in the popular method by Moynihan et al [6], for evaluating the effective activation-1energy, E, from the slope <strong>of</strong> the q versus T gplots.The glass transition kinetics are commonly treated in the frameworks <strong>of</strong> the Tool [7]-Narayanaswamy [8]-Moynihan[9] (TNM) model that assumes the activation energy <strong>of</strong> the process to be constant. As fairly noted [10,11], the assumedArrhenius temperature dependence disagrees with the typically observed Vogel [12]-Tamman [13]-Fulcher [14] (VTF) and/or Williams-Landel-Ferry [15] (WLF) dependencies. In particular, Kovacs et al. [10], stressed that the applications <strong>of</strong> theTNM model should be limited “to systems in which viscosity obeys an Arrhenius dependence within and above the glasstransition range”. According to Angell [16], such systems are termed as strong glass-forming liquids, whereas the systemsthat obey the VTF/WLF behavior are called fragile liquids. The departure from the Arrhenius behavior is characterized bythe dynamic fragility, m. In general, this parameter is the smallest for inorganic oxide glasses and the largest for polymericglasses. Needles to say, the VTF/WLF behavior typically observed for polymers gives rise to an effective activationenergy that varies with temperature [17]. In our previous communication [18], we proposed to use an isoconversionalmethod to detect the variation in the activation energy throughout the glass transition. The application <strong>of</strong> the methodwas demonstrated for two polymers: polystyrene (PS) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). Why variation? Constantactivation energy is usually the anticipated outcome <strong>of</strong> kinetic evaluations. This expectation appears to be supported bytheoretical reasoning. The Arrhenius equation, eq (1),k Aexp(E/ RT)(1)where E is the activation energy (the heat <strong>of</strong> activation), A the preexponential factor, T the temperature, R the gasconstant, materializes Arrhenius hypothesis [19] that normal (i.e. inactive) molecules are in an endothermic equilibriumwith active ones, which take part in the reaction. According to Arrhenius, E is the heat absorbed in the process <strong>of</strong>31
Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1), 31-43transformation <strong>of</strong> inactive molecules into active ones, or, in other words, the heat (or energy) <strong>of</strong> activation. Owing toits thermodynamic meaning, E was treated [19,20] as a constant that is independent <strong>of</strong> the pathway taken by a systemfrom an initial to a final state. Van’t H<strong>of</strong>f [20] expected only a minor temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the activation energyas a result <strong>of</strong> the temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the heat capacity.Later, collision theory [21, 22] and activated-complex theory [23] introduced the idea <strong>of</strong> an energy barrier thathas to be crossed over for a reaction to occur. From the standpoint <strong>of</strong> these theories, Arrhenius’ activation is a parameterthat is directly related to the height <strong>of</strong> the energy barrier. Unlike the Arrhenius theory, collision theory and activatedcomplex treat the activation energy as a truly kinetic (dynamic) parameter, which is associated with reaction act itself.However, similar to Arrhenius theory, these theories treat the activation energy as an essentially constant parameter <strong>of</strong> areaction system [24]. These theoretical considerations led to the formation <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> constant activation energy,which seems to be a very reasonable approximation for the gas phase where chemical transformations take place by aseries <strong>of</strong> isolated binary collisions <strong>of</strong> molecules [25]. The temperature variation <strong>of</strong> the activation energy has alwys beena topic <strong>of</strong> considerable interest among kineticists. Hulett [26] published a short review, which appears to be the firstattempt to systematize the effects causing deviations from the Arrhenius law. Although thermal analysis is not reallyconcerned with the kinetics <strong>of</strong> gas phase reactions, it is worthy <strong>of</strong> note that even for these reactions the activation energyshould show a temperature dependence because <strong>of</strong> the temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the heat capacity <strong>of</strong> activation [26,27].There is a strong but rather unjustified tendency in the thermal analysis community to directly interpret theeffective activation energy in terms <strong>of</strong> a free energy barrier. Also, there are many flawed methods (the Coats-Redfernmethod definitely being the champion in popularity) that use a single heating rate and directly deliver a single andconstant value <strong>of</strong> the activation energy as well as a preexponential factor for any reactions, no matter how complex itmight be [27]. By accepting the concept <strong>of</strong> variable activation energy as a practical compromise, people abandon themethods that invariably produce a single value <strong>of</strong> the activation energy and start using multiple run (isothermal and/or nonisothermal) methods that allow for detecting reaction complexity [28-30]. Since this phenomenon is obviouslyinconsistent with the concept <strong>of</strong> constant activation energy, it seems reasonable to introduce a concept <strong>of</strong> variableactivation energy. This is not only more practical, but also universal because it permits a constant activation energy asa special case <strong>of</strong> a variable activation energy [25].PS and PS-clay nanocomposites. Implanting layered silicates into polymers is known [31] to modify dramaticallyvarious physical properties including thermal stability and fire resistance [32]. It has been found that compared to virginPS the clay nanocomposites have a somewhat higher glass transition temperature [33,34] and mechanical modulus, [34,35] decompose at significantly greater temperatures,[33,36] and demonstrate a substantial decrease in the maximumheat release rate <strong>of</strong> on combustion [36-38].It should be stressed that even when clay content is as lithe as 0.1%, the initial decomposition temperature isincreased by 40 o C and the heat peak release rate is decreased by about 40% relative to virgin PS [36]. The mechanism <strong>of</strong>such remarkable effect is not yet well understood. Although the thermal behavior <strong>of</strong> polymer-clay nanocomposites hasbeen studied extensively, the kinetic aspects <strong>of</strong> degradation and relaxation remain practically unknown. The importance<strong>of</strong> reliable kinetic analysis cannot be overestimated as it may provide information on the energy barriers <strong>of</strong> the processas well as <strong>of</strong>fer mechanistic clues.Indomethacin (IM). Obtaining crystalline pharmaceuticals in an amorphous form in certain cases leads to asignificant increase in the bioavailability. A fundamental problem associated with solid amorphous drugs is that theyFig. 1. Schematic presentation <strong>of</strong> the cooperative -process and noncooperative -process occurring in acooperatively rearranging region <strong>of</strong> size . The open area in the middle represents a mobility island32
- Page 7: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Gener
- Page 10: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. Gener
- Page 14 and 15: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 16 and 17: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 20 and 21: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 22 and 23: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 24 and 25: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 26 and 27: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 28 and 29: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 30 and 31: Gh. Duca et al./Chem.J. Mold.. 2008
- Page 34 and 35: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 36 and 37: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 38 and 39: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 40 and 41: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 42 and 43: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 44 and 45: Ion Dranca/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (1
- Page 46 and 47: M. Revenco et al./Chem.J. Mold. 200
- Page 48 and 49: M. Revenco et al./Chem.J. Mold. 200
- Page 50 and 51: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 52 and 53: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 54 and 55: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 56 and 57: Gh. Zgherea/Chem.J. Mold. 2008, 3 (
- Page 58 and 59: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 60 and 61: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 62 and 63: G. Vasile et al./Chem.J. Mold. 2008
- Page 64 and 65: V. Mukhin et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 66 and 67: V. Mukhin et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 68 and 69: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N. Ku
- Page 70 and 71: N. Kulikov et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 72 and 73: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 74 and 75: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 76 and 77: V. Gladchi et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008
- Page 78 and 79: Chemistry Journal of Moldova. R. St
- Page 80 and 81: R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 82 and 83:
R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 84 and 85:
R. Sturza et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 86 and 87:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. V. Bo
- Page 88 and 89:
V. Boldescu et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 90 and 91:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. I. Lu
- Page 92 and 93:
I. Lunga et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 94 and 95:
I. Lunga et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 96 and 97:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 98 and 99:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 100 and 101:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 102 and 103:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 104 and 105:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 106 and 107:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N.Gor
- Page 108 and 109:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 110 and 111:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 112 and 113:
N.Gorinchoy et al./Chem.J.Mold. 200
- Page 114 and 115:
I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 116 and 117:
I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 118 and 119:
I. Ogurtsov, A. Tihonovschi / Chem.
- Page 120 and 121:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 122 and 123:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 124 and 125:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 126 and 127:
M. Gonta et al./Chem.J.Mold. 2008,
- Page 128 and 129:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. N. Se
- Page 130 and 131:
Chemistry Journal of Moldova. D. Ba
- Page 132 and 133:
D. Batîr/Chem.J.Mold. 2008, 3 (1),
- Page 134 and 135:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera
- Page 136 and 137:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera
- Page 138:
CHEMISTRY JOURNAL OF MOLDOVA.Genera