O'Donoghue MTh_Thesis-FinalCopy.pdf - South African Theological ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ooks.Ervast P 1983. The Sermon on the Mount or the key to Christianity: an Iinterpretationby Pekka Ervast. Finland: Karisto Oy.France RT 1985©. Matthew. The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. GrandRapids, Michigan. William B Eerdmans Publishing Company._______1989©. Matthew – Evangelists and Teacher. Exeter: The Paternoster Press._______1994. Matthew, Mark and Luke. In DA Hagner (ed), A Theology of the NewTestament (rev. ed), 212-245. Cambridge: The Lutterworth Press.Ferguson SB 1987. The Sermon on the Mount: Kingdom Life in a fallen world.Edinburgh. The Banner of Truth Trust.Fleming HR n.d.a.. The Gospel According to Matthew. New York: Fleming H. RevellCompany.Goldsmith M 2001. Matthew and Mission: The Gospel through Jewish Eyes. Carlisle,Cumbria: Paternoster Press.Goshen-Gottstein 2001. God the Father in rabbinic Judaism and Christianity:transformed background or common ground? Journal of Ecumenical Studies38(4):470-504.Guelich RA 1982. The Sermon on the Mount: A Foundation for Understanding.Waco, Texas: Word Books.Gundry RH 1994©. A Survey of the New Testament (3 rdMichigan: Zondervan.ed). Grand Rapids,Guthrie DG 1976. New Testament Introduction (3 rd ed). England: Inter-Varsity Press._________1985. New Testament Theology. England: Inter-Varsity Press.Green JP (gen ed) 1986. The Interlinear Bible: Hebrew Greek English. Peabody107
Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishing.Green M 2000. The Message of Matthew: The Kingdom of Heaven. (rev. ed). BST.Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press.Hagner DA 1993. Matthew 1-13. Word Bible Commentary Volume 33a. DallasTexas: Word Books.Hahn HC 1986. Light, Shine, Lamp. In C Brown (ed), The New InternationalDictionary of New Testament Theology (vol. 2),, 468-487. Grand Rapids, Michigan.Hare RA 1992. Matthew: Interpretation A Bible Commentary for Teaching andPreaching. Louisville: John Know Press.Harrington S.J. DJ (ed) 1991 ©. The Gospel of Matthew. Sacra Pagina Collegeville,Minnesota: The Liturgical Press.Henry H 1960. An Exposition, With Practical Observations, Of the Gospel Accordingto St. Matthew. In LF Church’s (ed), Commentary on the Whole Bible by MatthewHenry, 1203-1363. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.Harrington, S.J. DJ (ed) 1991 ©. The Gospel of Matthew. Sacra Pagina. Collegeville,Minnesota: The Liturgical Press.Haughey JC 1997. God and Mammon. Living Pulpit 6 (3): 6.Hendrickx H 1984. The Sermon on the Mount: Studies on the Synoptic Gospels.London: Geoffrey Chapman.Hill D 1977. The Gospel of Matthew. London: Oliphants.Humphries-Brooks S 1996. Matthew. In WE Mill and RF Wilson (gen. eds), MercerCommentary on the Bible 6: The Gospels, 2-56. USA: Mercer University Press.Johnson LT 1999©. The Writings of the New Testament (rev. ed). Minneapolis:Fortress Press.108
Page 1 and 2:
A BIBLICAL-THEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF
Page 3 and 4:
ACKOWLEDGEMENTSI am eternally grate
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1: Introdu
Page 7 and 8:
6.2.5 Discipleship and Community…
Page 9 and 10:
sinfulness and pushes people toward
Page 11 and 12:
discourses in Matthew, is meant to
Page 13 and 14:
Christian disciple and money was an
Page 15 and 16:
NT text actually did occur and did
Page 17 and 18:
to have used it as a source (France
Page 19 and 20:
almost no evidence outside of the N
Page 21 and 22:
addressed.Jesus says things in the
Page 23 and 24:
The Jewish community was taxed very
Page 25 and 26:
finding the origin and purpose of M
Page 27:
instruction for the believing commu
Page 31 and 32:
Matthew will have continued pertine
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 3Literary Analysis - Struct
Page 35 and 36:
etween 6:19-24 and 7:1-11 that is c
Page 37 and 38:
would not have ever found such a li
Page 39 and 40:
and 7:7-11 are worth noting:a) Both
Page 41 and 42:
appealing. He seems to at times ack
Page 43 and 44:
three parts.While the literary appr
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 4Literary Analysis - Matthe
Page 47 and 48:
common to a teacher like Jesus woul
Page 49 and 50:
treasures would be, but agrees that
Page 51 and 52:
Blomberg (1992:123) shows that the
Page 53 and 54:
Talbert (2006:122) argues this by r
Page 55 and 56:
for God’s kingdom, it is in a bad
Page 57 and 58:
The statement that one cannot serve
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter FiveLiterary Analysis - Mat
Page 61 and 62:
Moses. Even more significant is tha
Page 63 and 64: ightly notes that humans are more v
Page 65 and 66: Secondly, Henry’s argument that o
Page 67 and 68: Perhaps the point is not to cast So
Page 69 and 70: The second reason related to this p
Page 71 and 72: the scriptures that even the great
Page 73 and 74: more than what one eats and wears.
Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER SIXTHEOLOGICAL MOTIFS OF MA
Page 77 and 78: 6:19-34 and that this chapter would
Page 79 and 80: It has now been established that Th
Page 81 and 82: Kingdom requires its citizens to ha
Page 83 and 84: “our Father,” i.e. the Father o
Page 85 and 86: It must be noted that the Father-So
Page 87 and 88: Matthew 25:31-36 presents Jesus as
Page 89 and 90: unanimous among scholars. These rea
Page 91 and 92: Unger and White (1985:171) note tha
Page 93 and 94: interdependent interpersonal relati
Page 95 and 96: examples of how a disciple may prov
Page 97 and 98: Chapter SevenConclusion7.1 Introduc
Page 99 and 100: the accumulation of wealth over and
Page 101 and 102: them. The historical analyses highl
Page 103 and 104: preparedness to give up monetary pu
Page 105 and 106: e for the benefit of the believing
Page 107 and 108: captivity to sin. The SOM itself wa
Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX ONETALBERTS FORMAL DIVISIO
Page 111 and 112: BIBLIOGRAPHYAchtemeier PJ, Green JB
Page 113: Clowney EP 1988. Church. In SB Ferg
Page 117 and 118: Peter Laing Publishing.Lloyd-Jones
Page 119 and 120: 73-97.Smith KG 2008. Academic Writi
show all

O'Donoghue MTh_Thesis-FinalCopy.pdf - South African Theological ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?