12.07.2015 Views

The Rachel Carson Letters and the Making of Silent ... - SAGE Open

The Rachel Carson Letters and the Making of Silent ... - SAGE Open

The Rachel Carson Letters and the Making of Silent ... - SAGE Open

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Paull 3Table 1. Timeline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Long Isl<strong>and</strong> Spray Trial <strong>and</strong> Associated Events.Year Action OutcomeMay 24, 1957January, 1958Application by six plaintiffs for an injunctionto stop <strong>the</strong> U.S. government from aerialspraying Long Isl<strong>and</strong> with DDT, aiming toeradicate <strong>the</strong> gypsy moth (District Court).Ehrenfried Pfeiffer: Entire edition <strong>of</strong> Bio-Dynamics devoted to his account: “Do wereally know what we are doing? DDT sprayprograms—<strong>the</strong>ir value <strong>and</strong> dangers.”Injunction denied. Long Isl<strong>and</strong> sprayedwith a mixture <strong>of</strong> DDT <strong>and</strong> keroseneoil.Supplied to <strong>Carson</strong> by Spock <strong>the</strong>following month.February, 1958 <strong>Carson</strong> contacts Marjorie Spock. Spock <strong>and</strong> Richards supply <strong>Carson</strong> withPfeiffer’s paper, share <strong>the</strong>ir contacts,<strong>and</strong> files <strong>of</strong> references, <strong>and</strong> this dataflow continues for <strong>the</strong> next 4 years.June 23, 1958Trial lasting 22 days; 50 witnesses; additionalDismissed. No damages proven.plaintiffs (District Court).April 21, 1959 Appeal (Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals: argued: April 21;Original decision upheld.decided October 1).March 28, 1960Appeal (Supreme Court). Petition for writ <strong>of</strong>certiorari, i.e., review.Denied. Dissenting opinion by JusticeWilliam Douglas.November 30, 1961 Dr. Ehrenfried Pfeiffer died, New York state.June 16, 23, <strong>and</strong> 30, 1962 <strong>Silent</strong> Spring serialized in <strong>the</strong> New Yorker. Attacks in Chemical Week, Science, <strong>and</strong>Time Magazine.September 27, 1962 <strong>Silent</strong> Spring published by Houghton Mifflin. Acclaim <strong>and</strong> success.Note. DDT = dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.<strong>The</strong> initial application for an injunction to halt <strong>the</strong> sprayprogram failed. In retrospect we can see that what <strong>the</strong>n happenedto <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Spock <strong>and</strong> Richards was a precursor <strong>of</strong>what happened soon after in Vietnam with a massive aerialchemical warfare operation authorized by President Kennedystarting in 1961 (Neil<strong>and</strong>s, 1971). <strong>The</strong> U.S. government’schemical wars against <strong>the</strong> gypsy moth in <strong>the</strong> United States,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Viet Cong in Vietnam, were contemporaneous wars.<strong>The</strong>y ultimately both failed in <strong>the</strong>ir primary objectives, but at<strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Long Isl<strong>and</strong> Spray Trial, both defeats were in<strong>the</strong> future, <strong>and</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r was foreseen by <strong>the</strong> advocates <strong>of</strong> thosewars.Marjorie Spock kept supporters informed <strong>of</strong> legal developments:“From <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 1957 to 1960 when <strong>the</strong> casereached <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court, Marjorie wrote a report to interested<strong>and</strong> influential friends <strong>of</strong> each day’s progress in <strong>and</strong> out<strong>of</strong> court” (Fay, 2008, p. 7). <strong>Carson</strong> was one recipient <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>seintelligence reports (Fay, 2008; Lear, 1997).A voluminous amount <strong>of</strong> material was generated for, <strong>and</strong> by,<strong>the</strong> court actions as <strong>the</strong> case was escalated from an applicationfor an injunction in 1957 (injunction denied), a District Courttrial in 1958 (complaint dismissed), an action brought to <strong>the</strong>Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals in 1959 (dismissal decision upheld; no successto <strong>the</strong> plaintiffs), <strong>and</strong> eventually an uplift to <strong>the</strong> SupremeCourt in 1960 (appeal denied; no joy for <strong>the</strong> appellants; Murphyv. Benson, 1957, 1958, 1959b; Murphy v. Butler, 1960).In <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se 4 years <strong>of</strong> legal challenge to <strong>the</strong>U.S. Federal Government’s authority to spray privateproperty, Spock <strong>and</strong> Richards built up an arsenal <strong>of</strong> researchmaterial, as well as contacts <strong>and</strong> expert witnesses.Two New York Biodynamic Farmers<strong>The</strong> petition to <strong>the</strong> U.S. Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals stated thatMisses Richards <strong>and</strong> Spock . . . moved to Long Isl<strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong>sole purpose <strong>of</strong> being able <strong>the</strong>re to produce food free <strong>of</strong>chemicals . . . it is a legitimate use to make <strong>of</strong> one’s own property<strong>and</strong> it is “frustrated” by <strong>the</strong> spraying <strong>of</strong> DDT . . . <strong>The</strong> MissesSpock <strong>and</strong> Richards went to very substantial expense solely for<strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir “organic” cultivation. (Murphy v. Benson,1959a, p. 7)Spock <strong>and</strong> Richards had both studied at <strong>the</strong> Goe<strong>the</strong>anum,Dornach, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> headquarters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AnthroposophicMovement. According to Henry Barnes (2005), <strong>the</strong> chronicler<strong>of</strong> Rudolf Steiner’s work in North America, Spock’s life“encompasses <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> Anthroposophy” in America(p. 112). Spock had traveled to Dornach as an 18-year-old, inOctober 1922. She returned to <strong>the</strong> United States in December1924 (Barnes, 2005). This adventure proved to be <strong>the</strong> beginning<strong>of</strong> a lifetime passion <strong>and</strong> dedication to anthroposophy,<strong>and</strong> particularly to eurythmy, Waldorf education, <strong>and</strong>biodynamics.Spock’s first visit to Dornach was a time <strong>of</strong> momentous<strong>and</strong> far reaching events for anthroposophy. On New Year’sEve 1922/1923, she witnessed <strong>the</strong> first Goe<strong>the</strong>anum burn toDownloaded from by guest on January 12, 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!