12.07.2015 Views

Download 1 - Central Bureau of Investigation

Download 1 - Central Bureau of Investigation

Download 1 - Central Bureau of Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

More skeletons'in JindaldosetTHE LATEST revelation by the CBI stating that theJindalGroup had allegcdly misrepresentedfacts in orderto Incur favour from the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Coal, particularlythe Minister <strong>of</strong> State for Coal, Dasari Narayan Rao, theco-accused in the FIR, Indicate the level <strong>of</strong>corrupflonthat bad beenresorted to by the steeland power tycoon,who isalso an Ml' from Ute ICurukshetra constituency iiiHaryana.'Ihe topprobing body's recent statements clearlypaint out that undue favour was given tothe Jindal Groupcornpanles Jindal Steel and Power Llmited (JSPL) andGagan Sponge-fron Pvt Ltd (GSIPL), even though theMinistry <strong>of</strong>Power was against the proposalfor allocatingAsnarkondaMurgadangal coalblock to the firma. In therevelations, it hascome to light that DS Rao had writtentothe government <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand a teuerdated 20 June 2007,wherein hehad stresseonallocating the said cöal blockto three companies, out <strong>of</strong>which two JSPLand GSIPLhad- -in their application thelevel<strong>of</strong>preparednessln Jindal " Groupsmisrepresented ___________________setting up Ute proposedflagrant floutingend used plant (Elli'). <strong>of</strong> norms, bothNot only did Ute saidfirmaenvuro menmisquoteaantheirpreparedness t 1 procedural, meritsministry <strong>of</strong> coal In UteJharkhand government,but also to Ute ScreenIng Committee, whichdecided Ute final namesstrid action to setrrecedent and odas a deterrentafter going thmughUte shortlisted flrms. 'Ihus, DS Rao,overruling warnmgs from not one but two institutions,that is Ute ministry <strong>of</strong> powerand Ute streening committee,weifl ahead to sanction Ute coal blocks to Ute JindalGroup firma, in stark effrontery to Ute recommendations:'In Ute wake <strong>of</strong> Ute fresh expositions by Ute CBI, ltbecomes evident that Ute Jindal Group had resortedto extreme measures to arm-twist Ute governmentmachinery into submittftig to hiswhims and faneiesanduneUticafly procure Ute coal blocks even Utough Uteirpreparations fell farshort <strong>of</strong>adequate. Obvlously,Utere aremore skeletons in Ute Jindalcloset, which hasbeert miredin controversies not onlyin Ute state <strong>of</strong> Jharkhand, but alsoinOtattisgaxhwhere Ute industrialhouse bad forciblyacquired land from tribals to set üp residential coloniesfor Ute employees<strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong>their firms. Further, JindalGroup is involved in mining irregularities in more Utanone state, and itsproposed 1000 MW captive power plantsthat were supposed to be set up in Patratu and Dtunkadistricts in Jharkhand are already sunk in Ute quagmire<strong>of</strong> rampant corruption, nepotism and larceny Utat havebeen being exposed over Ute course <strong>of</strong>past monUts. Infact, Jindal Group forms one <strong>of</strong> Ute significant chunlc <strong>of</strong>Ute gigantic coal block allocation scain, as pointed outrecently by Ute inter-ministerial group Utat intensifiedUte drive against flrms sittingidle on allotted coalblocksand recommended issuingshowcause notices against Utedefaulters. Jindal Group's bPazenflouting <strong>of</strong> norms, boUtprocedural and environmental, in addition to its blatantapathy towards Uteplight <strong>of</strong> Ute local peoplewho it routinelyuproots in its relentless drin to set up more plants,merits stringent action against lt.


___________ø._*4V'I*t! _______ 4fitt tntalT911v..'iii 0*i* ciifltj*tfeftt**dW*T.iP'44&i


'k& Rcici ct,i. . 4clkIcl c(J 1-1Thiig14ff2*HI )I1R ti4i 10t91t (ilmi) Iflsu**iit tft I Trm 1II4l131l'[W4 luThn ti* rr ___10 *it ar*uij'p* Pitti 1Wtisii imrtiqu1c4,ç TRt T T 1ik'4 il9 3iirg41 P91I(ttIfI4k111TI Wt ufkT 10 4 iin 4 4t v11eiti314,9fl, c4.Iki Tf tiijit4rft**T?INT E..ibcji(4 t PR41I1 60flTh9 i ifl aiii1ii iftii in *m ti a1eu,* RPT iiNgc 4fii UITRtIaT*4tiftu fl $ 11


*#h____* 1j_I9UzJg :t3iiIgg5T Ifl9Mjt, fWt8US *1 3VFIt 1e1 4flii 4T1LSI4 TE f I R3ftT~,1t 4tn#tr iimq W lThmn sft* wt4 ____(ar)914 * 'le1icRT iilir uI 4S aia15mm1*wefl4 iiSg%W (ar.) T$ smit R4iii4innfki*11c,1IcI( 4 rmr %iPijffii*iç cqg4q4i*T34 (I) c4 DT~lg ii4 wSaifftr V1T Itt *ITT I 4____S4WfttlT 4 4*1* viu itlT


Ifp-a..4 1It, 2__iit (ii') wtwr it t mc p iw ndi 'it; ai flflt t *c.cu iftgiu'nftti if 1 fui~~iriuaoa * cuft fT tIT ~fl sit lwm 11711, Xr Ri)r'i iwt*%4tiift suIii d 14ffii fl fl 1r t, *20 1ff2010 tiflsitmtrttr*'RtflTT1 fMFswi d'i1*4111eSS11ti4aliw !titi* 1*T, *qTq* S 17c4r mwi**flaiifttiaiflnc wi' w*ftitNT tI%m. 1973 ii 1T ~I* SIc Sl1 20 fl 2010 ffi7 zi #1 nn* m_4 EItt4IiIt4tLt{IEIiIF&tgtLtEtpEm~jEaj[l*fta1T miSi *ft t#*_______ _____ ____________iiuw'pfl ai*4q,r4 ti I*1 IIT WRT pr F1T tfitauWtr kdttIfFtair IN19U ti t1i$3 1962tmI3Y4*12,afajttt'RT ift ti ittw 3IMr__________I i Si** r Yr j I flil*r 62 ciicitflcit nI


___:;;-;----qi1ciffisjii__ ____Wf4tu 2*WIVfr~*sn t--.--- Wfttwwitaft'zTTdIgI T9l d St'du3mT Tlmreltt"ti*iiflT ftfr3IIWIRiT1f R1tiii ag*k-*"4*TIflt*i8191i ziftaraitRfr3RM'Rk1ft iiiiti


____ _______ ____*ni# V: r'A eiP *3Tseitui Picugeuimrn'dff R1*I'4k"it fti si fl IIVI!Y d___ ____4aqj Ni&flbffil* 4 ja$ nqThgij _'I____ ____ s"iid'i___M'____ggigi______ _______al giI)1to 3iidai '1?mI T fl1I3I flIRi3ffizi 'tn''fi *%t IWTfl1#41*I4. ipni*i5'- 132004 44 u$1ftrPMIIft1j4iT c'ie4 kTv ro I'3Md4 fit ria* **ii n a4ta1t ifti ki*3F1 'W iWIl 4'4Mt34t$ fn ti ipnm 'Mtwin *t4 mt'45T* t4ta$ri ttftiq*a 4* f* NR ,tfl4 RTTftiidwi #a14iflne1rfw IkITnTId#.


Top cOp stingt<strong>of</strong>igureinLimit caseBy Abhishek BhallaA STING operationconducted by aGuiarat cadre IPS<strong>of</strong>ficer who is anaccused In the IshratJahan encountercase is likely to findmention in thechargesheet that the<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Bureau</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Investigation</strong> (CBI)will filein the case onWednesday.G.L. Singhal, who waspart <strong>of</strong> the team thatcarried out theencounterwas arrestedearlier this year.Slnghal in 2011 hadrecorded conversations <strong>of</strong>some top <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> thestate government and thelaw <strong>of</strong>ficers In the state.Sources said the conversationsindicatethat therewere attempts beingmade to save the police<strong>of</strong>ficers who were underquestion. Singhal Is currentlyout on bail.Sources said Slnghalrecorded the conversationsbefore his arrest asIshrat was shot deadby the Gujarat Police.he was scared and wantedto save a pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> thelarger conspiracy as asafeguard for himselLWhile the C hasdecided not to presscharges against RajendraKumar lB Speclai Directorwho was questionedby the CBI twice. In thefirst charge sheet, sourcessaid the sting operation Islikely to find a mention.The CBI wifi charge onlythe <strong>of</strong>ficers who were onthe encounter site In thefirst charge sheet. "The"ZOo4ist,ratJahan and threeothers gunneddown by GujaratPolice*2009Ahmedabadmetropolitanmagistrate S.P.Tamang called It atake encounter1 "2010 GuJrathlghcourtaskssgto Investigate"ZOlZCBitookoverthe probeafter differences<strong>of</strong>opinion In the511 led to It beIngdissolvedfirst charge sheet will dealonly with the encounteitAfterjolnlng all the dots asupplementary chargesheet on the conspiracywill be filed," a CDI <strong>of</strong>ficersaid.CDI sources say sincethe conspiracy angle isstill under probe formerGujarat Home MinisterAmit Shah could also becaned for questioning.The CDI has been probingthe role <strong>of</strong> Icurnar inthe alleged fake encounter<strong>of</strong> 2004, when Ishrat alongwith three other allegedLeT terrorists was gunneddown, It was alleged thatthey had planned to killGujarat Chief MinisterNarendra Modi. Kumarhad passed this intelligenceInput to the statepolice.There has been a difference<strong>of</strong> opinion betweenthe CDI and home ministryregarding prosecutionsanction for Kumait


7't1t3u* uiiiiciitjda3tIflT*glu*wJqaw4IS ~ftt au*tr i*mtmatit*Ii1j12tT9wll%4rWlltTRnw4ift9


____3iicictl f1iw,3iiig 111giulix 1CDdl W13$___fttthI3w flffivj4'jT 2004 ~wifl a't*e i4pizig caqt R1atw?Afl: dr*fl *4F &R 3c4c'd1W1Ralft4t(wu) rMif4zir 3VMWTSfljfl3nqpiieftItwa1Icic4,clIl i RqqaI*tj4* t3iicjq,qiT4I'rn,i4i asi1giicmaiiarti .ai4k, ur Qiz, 1r'liii it Vti'ft Mzni

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!