12.07.2015 Views

Temporal and fine-scale variation in the biogeochemistry of Jervis Bay

Temporal and fine-scale variation in the biogeochemistry of Jervis Bay

Temporal and fine-scale variation in the biogeochemistry of Jervis Bay

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CERF Mar<strong>in</strong>e Biodiversity Hub <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> Survey Report, February 2009classification scheme was exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980s when <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Defence (DoD)funded a 3-year multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary project to establish basel<strong>in</strong>e data for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>ecosystem, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> quantification <strong>of</strong> spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal <strong>variation</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>faunalcommunities. This study revealed over 630 <strong>in</strong>faunal species <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 248 crustaceans,197 molluscs, 171 polychaetes, 15 ech<strong>in</strong>oderms, <strong>and</strong> several nemerteans, sipunculans,phoronids, turbellarids, <strong>and</strong> coelenterates (Hutch<strong>in</strong>gs & Jacoby 1994). The DoD projectalso <strong>in</strong>cluded quantification <strong>of</strong> large <strong>and</strong> conspicuous plants <strong>and</strong> animals us<strong>in</strong>g videotransects <strong>in</strong> which 22 animals <strong>and</strong> plants could be reliably identified (Jacoby et al. 1995b).These <strong>in</strong>clude sea pens, kelp, drift-weed (Gracilaria edulis or Acrosorium venulosum),polychaetes (chaeopterid hummocks <strong>and</strong> eunicid trees). Bivalve clumps were alsoidentified on video <strong>and</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ed up to 51 taxa (Jacoby et al. 1995b). Based onmultivariate analyses, assemblages were classed <strong>in</strong>to one <strong>of</strong> five groups: bivalve clumps,drift algae, polychaete hummock, bioturbated s<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> rippled s<strong>and</strong> (Jacoby et al.1995b).Geoscience Australia ran several short surveys to <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2007-2008, some <strong>of</strong>which <strong>in</strong>volved characteris<strong>in</strong>g benthic assemblages <strong>and</strong> geochemistry at de<strong>f<strong>in</strong>e</strong>d stations.Samples are still be<strong>in</strong>g processed, but prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>sediments conta<strong>in</strong> a high abundance <strong>and</strong> richness <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fauna that varies across hundreds <strong>of</strong>meters (Anderson et al. 2009).1.3.2. Geochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>Very little literature has been published about <strong>the</strong> geochemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>, particularlyregard<strong>in</strong>g spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal <strong>variation</strong>, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> (Anderson et al. 2009).Major ecological studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> focus on benthic assemblages, but <strong>the</strong>y do notmeasure sediment or geochemical factors (Ward & Jacoby 1992, CSIRO 1994, Hutch<strong>in</strong>gs& Jacoby 1994), which presumably affect associated benthic assemblages.The seafloor at <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> consists largely <strong>of</strong> <strong>f<strong>in</strong>e</strong>-gra<strong>in</strong>ed s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> slopes gently <strong>and</strong>evenly towards <strong>the</strong> entrance where s<strong>and</strong>s are coarser (Albani et al. 1973, Taylor et al.1995). Invertebrate rema<strong>in</strong>s comprise 5-20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sediments (Albani et al. 1973, Tayloret al. 1995), although carbonate content <strong>in</strong> coarse sediments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> entrance may be ashigh as 80% (Albani et al. 1973).Water quality <strong>and</strong> circulation may also affect benthic communities. Current speeds with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> bay are quite low, <strong>of</strong>ten less than 0.05 ms -1 , although deeper currents are stronger <strong>and</strong>more directionally-consistent than surface currents (Holloway 1995). Calculations revealthat flush<strong>in</strong>g times <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bay vary between 6-20 days (Holloway 1995) thus provid<strong>in</strong>g acoarse measurement <strong>of</strong> how long larvae, freshwater, <strong>and</strong> pollutants may rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>bay.1.3.3. Spatial <strong>variation</strong> at <strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong>Spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal <strong>variation</strong> has been well-studied <strong>in</strong> seagrass <strong>and</strong> fish communities <strong>of</strong><strong>Jervis</strong> <strong>Bay</strong> (Ferrell & Bell 1991, Bell et al. 1992, Ferrell et al. 1993, Jacoby et al. 1995a,Kirkman et al. 1995, Worth<strong>in</strong>gton et al. 1995), but <strong>the</strong>re have been comparatively fewstudies on <strong>in</strong>vertebrate assemblages <strong>in</strong> deeper waters (Hutch<strong>in</strong>gs & Jacoby 1994, Jacoby4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!