12.07.2015 Views

Studies on Antimicrobial Properties of Vegetable, Fruit & Spice ...

Studies on Antimicrobial Properties of Vegetable, Fruit & Spice ...

Studies on Antimicrobial Properties of Vegetable, Fruit & Spice ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Studies</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>….Suvro Saha et.al.were observed respectively for the methanol and cold water extract <strong>of</strong> nutmeg shell but the other twoextracts were not found to be effective against the organism.In Fig.6 Effect <strong>of</strong> extracts <strong>on</strong> Lactococcus lactis; am<strong>on</strong>g the four extracts <strong>of</strong> orange peel, the z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong>inhibiti<strong>on</strong> was observed for hot and cold water extract (28.70mm and 54.86mm respectively); themaximum z<strong>on</strong>e was given by cold water extracts <strong>of</strong> the orange peel. Except the acet<strong>on</strong>e extract <strong>of</strong> thest<strong>on</strong>e apple shell, the inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e was observed as 43.18mm, 37.08mm, 47.24mm respectively forthe methanol, hot and cold water extract <strong>of</strong> the sample. The inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e for the methanol extract <strong>of</strong>st<strong>on</strong>e apple was same against K. pneum<strong>on</strong>ia and L. lactis. Am<strong>on</strong>g the four extracts <strong>of</strong> pea peel andcoc<strong>on</strong>ut shell, the inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e (30.48mm and 33.78mm) was <strong>on</strong>ly seen for methanol extract <strong>of</strong>these two samples. The inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e (18.54mm) was observed <strong>on</strong>ly for the cold water extract <strong>of</strong>jackfruit peel sample. 29.46mm and 34.54mm inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>es are observed respectively for hot andcold water extracts <strong>of</strong> banana inflorescence peel but no z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> was seen for other twoextracts <strong>of</strong> this sample. Am<strong>on</strong>g the four extracts <strong>of</strong> the pumpkin peel, the z<strong>on</strong>es <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> weredetected for two extracts i.e. methanol extract (35.56mm) and hot water extract (45.72mm). No z<strong>on</strong>e<strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> was produced by the four extracts <strong>of</strong> the watermel<strong>on</strong> peel. The inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e by the hotwater extracts <strong>of</strong> black cardamom peel and methanol extract <strong>of</strong> nutmeg shell were observed as34.54mm and 27.94mm respectively but inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e was not observed for the remaining extracts<strong>of</strong> these samples.Fig.7: Effect <strong>of</strong> extracts <strong>on</strong> Aspergillus niger; the z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 41.40mm, 23.62mm,21.84mm, 31.24mm, 49.02mm, 29.46mm, 30.48mm, 81.28mm (to note that highest z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong>was observed against Aspergillus niger), 39.62mm were observed respectively for methanol andacet<strong>on</strong>e extract <strong>of</strong> orange, methanol and acet<strong>on</strong>e extract <strong>of</strong> st<strong>on</strong>e apple, acet<strong>on</strong>e and hot water extract<strong>of</strong> pea peel, hot water extract <strong>of</strong> coc<strong>on</strong>ut shell, cold water extracts <strong>of</strong> jackfruit peel and methanolextract <strong>of</strong> pumpkin peel.In Fig.8 Effect <strong>of</strong> extracts <strong>on</strong> Candida albicans; am<strong>on</strong>g the four extracts <strong>of</strong> the orange peel and st<strong>on</strong>eapple shell, the z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> were detected as 50.8mm, 54.86mm, 22.86mm, 55.88mm, 37.08mmrespectively for the methanol extract <strong>of</strong> the orange peel, acet<strong>on</strong>e extract <strong>of</strong> st<strong>on</strong>e apple shell and peapeel, cold water extract <strong>of</strong> jackfruit peel and banana inflorescence peel and area <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> was notobserved for other extracts <strong>of</strong> these five samples. The inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 22.86mm and 41.40mm wasdetected respectively for methanol and acet<strong>on</strong>e extracts <strong>of</strong> coc<strong>on</strong>ut shell but remaining two extractswere not effective against C.albicans. No z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> was observed for the pumpkin peelextracts against C. albicans. The inhibiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 74.42mm and 35.56mm was detected respectivelyfor acet<strong>on</strong>e and hot water extracts <strong>of</strong> watermel<strong>on</strong> peel but remaining two extracts were not effectiveagainst the organism. Except for the acet<strong>on</strong>e extract <strong>of</strong> black cardamom, the remaining three extractsi.e. methanol extract (45.72mm), hot and cold water extract (46.48mm and 40.64mm respectively)were effective. Z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 48.26mm, 68.58mm, 25.4mm were observed respectively formethanol, acet<strong>on</strong>e and hot water extracts <strong>of</strong> nutmeg shell. The highest z<strong>on</strong>e was given by acet<strong>on</strong>eextract <strong>of</strong> watermel<strong>on</strong> peel.Fig.9 Effect <strong>of</strong> extracts <strong>on</strong> Sporotrichum pruinosum, the z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 34.54mm, 66.04mm and56.64mm were observed respectively for the methanol, acet<strong>on</strong>e and hot water extract <strong>of</strong> orange peelbut cold water extract was not observed against the organism. The z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 36.32mm,33.02mm and 66.04mm were observed respectively for the methanol, hot and cold water extract <strong>of</strong>st<strong>on</strong>e apple shell but acet<strong>on</strong>e extract was not found effective against the organism. The z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong>inhibiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 39.62mm and 34.54mm were observed respectively for the hot and cold water extract <strong>of</strong>pea peel and no z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> was observed for remaining two extract. Apart from methanolextract <strong>of</strong> coc<strong>on</strong>ut shell, the area <strong>of</strong> inhibiti<strong>on</strong> was observed respectively by acet<strong>on</strong>e extracts1897 J. Chem. Bio. Phy. Sci. Sec. B; 2013, Vol.3, No.3; 1886-1899.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!