e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia
e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia e-learning readiness - Asia Pacific Region - Open University Malaysia
has been ranked 8 in the years 2003 and 2004 (Economist Intelligence Unit,2004). Among 64 countries from all over the world, Malaysia was ranked33 in 2003 and 2004 for e-readiness. The study also found that Malaysiahas been able to transform its technology manufacturing industry into oneof IT and Internet-friendly support service.However, in the recent Global Competitiveness Report 2004 by the WorldEconomic Forum, Malaysia was ranked 27 th in the technology index,down from 20 th in 2003. Minister Datuk Dr. Jamaludin Jarjis’ response tothis was that his ministry has embarked on or will undertake a series ofprogrammes to boost Malaysia’s ranking (Chow, 2004). One example isthe plan to increase the broadband penetration rate through the NationalBroadband Plan.Other studies have also found positive indicators of Malaysia’s E-learningreadiness. In one case study (http://www.optinit.org, 2004), it is reportedthat Malaysia’s “Vision 2020” programmes include development of theICT sector to improve its competitiveness at a global level. Some of theinitiatives cited for improving ELR are increasing ICT literacy, developingportals for cooperation among work communities and e-commerceinitiatives.Past research has also provided an understanding of a number ofconstructs that may be used to calibrate the E-learning readiness of apeople or a region. For example, a report on E-learning readiness inASEAN countries, examined ELR using constructs such as infrastructure,political will, integration of business requirements into a country’spolicies, legislation and regulation with regards to E-learning, as well asinnovations that improve productivity and standard of living. Onanother front, the Economic Intelligent Unit used E- readiness criteria thatassessed six categories: technology infrastructure, their general businessenvironment, the degree to which E-business is being adopted byconsumers and companies, social and cultural conditions that influenceInternet usage, and the availability of services to support E-businesses. Incomparison to the above list of ELR criteria, a study by McConnellInternational (2000), examined E-readiness using the following:connectivity, E-leadership, informal security, human capital, and the E-business climate.Although operational definitions and assessment criteria for readiness arevaried, it may be concluded that most measures of E-learning readinessexamine the following dimensions: the learner, the management, thepersonnel, the culture, the provision of relevant content, as well astechnical, financial, and environmental resources.In addition to measures of E-learning readiness is the issue ofimplementing sustainable and far-reaching imperatives for creating an E-savvy citizenry. In 1999, the National Information Technology Council(NITC) recommended three broad imperatives for the implementation ofinnovative and indigenous E-learning imperatives. These were:Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 5
1. The promotion of information fluency toward the right ofaccess to E- learning for all Malaysians (p.27).2. The creation of windows of opportunity to develop newmodes of learning and innovative learning strategies based onthe new information and communication technologies (p.29).3. The development of indigenous content so that E-learningshall be imbued by Malaysian values, as it further infusesthem into Malaysian Society. E- Learning will be driven byindigenous technology derived from national R&D (p.30).The systematic implementation of the above imperatives is deemedcrucial as there appears to be a short supply of Malaysian professionalswith ICT skills (http://www.opt-init.org/framework/pages/2.3.html).Further, there is a need to cultivate and train more specialists in E-learning, particularly instructional designers and E-learning contentproviders. Further, there is a need to develop more adequateinfrastructure and to ensure the availability of broadband access to awider spectrum of the society. Bearing this in view, this study on E-learning readiness in Malaysia has been carried out to provide input onMalaysian readiness in a number of pertinent areas.1.3 Research QuestionsThe study focused on four groups of individuals: policy makers,providers, enablers and receivers of E-learning who were directly orindirectly involved in E-learning at the tertiary level of education as wellas in training at the workplace. In particular, the study aimed to answerthe following questions:1. To what extent are policy makers enabling or ready toenable E-learning programmes within their respectiveorganisations?2. To what extent are providers (private corporations,organisations, tertiary educational institutions and majortechnology providers) ready to embark or have embarkedon E-Learning programmes?3. To what extent are enablers (tutors, lecturers and trainers)ready to deliver E-learning programmes?4. To what extent are receivers (learners and trainees) readyfor E-Learning?The section below describes the methodology used in the study.Operational definitions of terms associated with the study are alsoincluded.Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 6
- Page 1 and 2: e-learning readinesse-learningMalay
- Page 3 and 4: E-LEARNING READINESSIN MALAYSIA 200
- Page 5 and 6: E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
- Page 7 and 8: E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
- Page 9 and 10: E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
- Page 11 and 12: E-learning Readiness in Malaysia 20
- Page 13 and 14: application of ICT to pave the way
- Page 15: University College, lecturers are e
- Page 19 and 20: 1.4.1 The ELR InstrumentFour instru
- Page 21 and 22: 1.4.3 The RespondentsThe respondent
- Page 23 and 24: (b) Area of Readiness:Content Readi
- Page 25 and 26: 2POLICY MAKERS ANDORGANISATIONSThis
- Page 27 and 28: TABLE 2. Demographic Profile of Pol
- Page 29 and 30: surveyed (including one policy make
- Page 31 and 32: According to the data in Table 8 wh
- Page 33 and 34: difference, however, can be observe
- Page 35 and 36: Level of Overall Readiness among Po
- Page 37 and 38: 2019.616.7Percent1512.813.7106.95.9
- Page 39 and 40: 3PROVIDERSThis chapter presents the
- Page 41 and 42: adequate for achieving the ideal ba
- Page 43 and 44: TABLE 17. Provision of Applications
- Page 45 and 46: TABLE 20. Preference for Single poi
- Page 47 and 48: expertise to develop content for E-
- Page 49 and 50: Finally, it was suggested that step
- Page 51 and 52: According to a respondent, one of t
- Page 53 and 54: In terms of financial readiness, th
- Page 55 and 56: TABLE 28. Level of Overall Readines
- Page 57 and 58: 2524.02017.315Percent1012.013.310.7
- Page 59 and 60: 201516.4415.0716.4415.07Percent1010
- Page 61 and 62: 4ENABLERSThis section presents find
- Page 63 and 64: month. This shows that, in general,
- Page 65 and 66: As shown in Table 33, the top three
has been ranked 8 in the years 2003 and 2004 (Economist Intelligence Unit,2004). Among 64 countries from all over the world, <strong>Malaysia</strong> was ranked33 in 2003 and 2004 for e-<strong>readiness</strong>. The study also found that <strong>Malaysia</strong>has been able to transform its technology manufacturing industry into oneof IT and Internet-friendly support service.However, in the recent Global Competitiveness Report 2004 by the WorldEconomic Forum, <strong>Malaysia</strong> was ranked 27 th in the technology index,down from 20 th in 2003. Minister Datuk Dr. Jamaludin Jarjis’ response tothis was that his ministry has embarked on or will undertake a series ofprogrammes to boost <strong>Malaysia</strong>’s ranking (Chow, 2004). One example isthe plan to increase the broadband penetration rate through the NationalBroadband Plan.Other studies have also found positive indicators of <strong>Malaysia</strong>’s E-<strong>learning</strong><strong>readiness</strong>. In one case study (http://www.optinit.org, 2004), it is reportedthat <strong>Malaysia</strong>’s “Vision 2020” programmes include development of theICT sector to improve its competitiveness at a global level. Some of theinitiatives cited for improving ELR are increasing ICT literacy, developingportals for cooperation among work communities and e-commerceinitiatives.Past research has also provided an understanding of a number ofconstructs that may be used to calibrate the E-<strong>learning</strong> <strong>readiness</strong> of apeople or a region. For example, a report on E-<strong>learning</strong> <strong>readiness</strong> inASEAN countries, examined ELR using constructs such as infrastructure,political will, integration of business requirements into a country’spolicies, legislation and regulation with regards to E-<strong>learning</strong>, as well asinnovations that improve productivity and standard of living. Onanother front, the Economic Intelligent Unit used E- <strong>readiness</strong> criteria thatassessed six categories: technology infrastructure, their general businessenvironment, the degree to which E-business is being adopted byconsumers and companies, social and cultural conditions that influenceInternet usage, and the availability of services to support E-businesses. Incomparison to the above list of ELR criteria, a study by McConnellInternational (2000), examined E-<strong>readiness</strong> using the following:connectivity, E-leadership, informal security, human capital, and the E-business climate.Although operational definitions and assessment criteria for <strong>readiness</strong> arevaried, it may be concluded that most measures of E-<strong>learning</strong> <strong>readiness</strong>examine the following dimensions: the learner, the management, thepersonnel, the culture, the provision of relevant content, as well astechnical, financial, and environmental resources.In addition to measures of E-<strong>learning</strong> <strong>readiness</strong> is the issue ofimplementing sustainable and far-reaching imperatives for creating an E-savvy citizenry. In 1999, the National Information Technology Council(NITC) recommended three broad imperatives for the implementation ofinnovative and indigenous E-<strong>learning</strong> imperatives. These were:Joint Study by MEWC and OUM 5