Heller M, Woodin W.H. (eds.) Infinity. New research frontiers (CUP, 2011)(ISBN 1107003873)(O)(327s)_MAml_
Heller M, Woodin W.H. (eds.) Infinity. New research frontiers (CUP, 2011)(ISBN 1107003873)(O)(327s)_MAml_ Heller M, Woodin W.H. (eds.) Infinity. New research frontiers (CUP, 2011)(ISBN 1107003873)(O)(327s)_MAml_
158 concept calculus: much better thanproof Let S,S ′ ,A,E,R, x, A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ , y ′ , z ′ be as given. Apply Lemma8.22 to (A, E, R, x)|x and (A, E, R, x)|x, obtaining S = S ′ . By Lemma 8.21,E(y ′ , z ′ ), S = S ′ .Lemma 8.24 Let (A, E, R, x) be a system. Then y ∈ A ∧¬E(y,x) ↔(∃z)(R(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#).proof Let A, E, R, x be as given. For the forward direction, it suffices toshow that B = {y ∈ A: E(y,x) ∨ (∃z)(R(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#)} contains [x] and isclosed under E,R predecessors. Closure under E predecessors is obvious. Nowlet R(u, y), y ∈ B. IfE(y,x), then R(u, x) ∧ u ∈ x#, and so u ∈ B. SupposeR(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#. Then u ∈ z#, and so u ∈ B.Conversely, let R(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#. Suppose E(y,x). Then R(z, y), y ∈ z#, z ∈z#, contradicting Lemma 8.18.Lemma 8.25 Suppose (∀a)(R(a,x) → (∃a ′ )(R ′ (a ′ , x ′ ) ∧ (A, E, R, x)|a ≈ (A ′ ,E ′ , R ′ , x ′ )|a ′ )), (∀a ′ )(R ′ (a ′ , x ′ ) → (∃a)(R(a, x) ∧ (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ )|a ′ ≈ (A, E, R,x)|a)). Then (A, E, R, x) ≈ (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ ).proof Let A, E, R, x, A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ be as given. By Lemma 8.23, the a ′ inthe first hypothesis is unique up to E ′ . For each a such that R(a,x), let T a bethe unique isomorphism from (A, E, R, x)|a onto (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ )|a ′ , where a ′is uniquely determined up to E ′ . The various T a cohere, according to Lemma8.22. Let T be the union of the various T a . Let T ∗ be T extended by {{:E(x,y) ∧ E ′ (x ′ ,z)}}.By the coherence, T respects E,E ′ and is univalent up to E ′ . By the secondhypothesis, T is onto the a ′ with R ′ (a ′ , x ′ ).Note that dom(T ) is the union of the a#, R(a,x), which, by Lemma 8.24, isA\[x]. Similarly, rng(T ) = A ′ \[x ′ ]. Hence, T ∗ also respects E, E ′ , is univalentup to E ′ , and is onto A ′ .Suppose u, v ∈ A\[x]. Let T (u, u ′ ),T(v, v ′ ). We claim thatR(u, v) ↔ R ′ (u ′ ,v ′ ).To see this, let u ∈ a#, R(a,x), v ∈ b#, R(b, x). Suppose R(u, v). Then u ∈ b#,and so u, v ∈ dom(T b ). By coherence, T b (u, u ′ ), T b (v, v ′ ). Hence, R ′ (u ′ , v ′ ). Theconverse is analogous.We also claim thatR(u, x) ↔ R ′ (u ′ ,x ′ )R(x,v) ↔ R ′ (x ′ ,v ′ ).Suppose R(u, x). Let u ∗ be such that R ′ (u ∗ , x ′ ) and (A, E, R, x)|u ≈ (A ′ , E ′ ,R ′ , x ′ )|u ∗ . Then T u (u, u ∗ ), and so T (u, u ∗ ). By coherence, E ′ (u ′ ,u ∗ ). Hence,R(u ′ , x ′ ).Note that x /∈ a#, x ′ /∈ b#, making the second equivalence vacuously true.This is because if x ∈ a# ∨ x ′ ∈ b#, then x is a maximal element of a# ∨ x ′ isa maximal element of b#, violating Lemma 8.18. From this we see that T is anisomorphism relation from (A, E, R, x) onto (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ ).
- Page 296: interpretation power 133a. Paramete
- Page 300: asic facts about interpretation pow
- Page 304: etter than, much better than 137We
- Page 308: etter than, much better than 139Unl
- Page 312: some implications 141two disjuncts
- Page 316: interpretation of mbt in zf 143both
- Page 320: interpretation of mbt in zf 145stru
- Page 324: interpretation of b + vsde + ssde i
- Page 328: interpretation of z in b + sde 149y
- Page 332: interpretation of z in b + sde 151p
- Page 336: interpretation of z in b + sde 153p
- Page 340: interpretation of z in b + sde 155p
- Page 344: interpretation of z in b + sde 157p
- Page 350: 160 concept calculus: much better t
- Page 354: 162 concept calculus: much better t
- Page 358: 164 concept calculus: much better t
- Page 364: CHAPTER 7Some Considerations on Inf
- Page 368: infinite divisibility of space: qua
- Page 372: infinite extension of space 171Cant
- Page 376: the danger of speculating about inf
- Page 380: eferences 175Infinity appears to me
- Page 384: infinity in classic cosmological mo
- Page 388: infinity in inflationary cosmology
- Page 392: infinity in inflationary cosmology
158 concept calculus: much better thanproof Let S,S ′ ,A,E,R, x, A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ , y ′ , z ′ be as given. Apply Lemma8.22 to (A, E, R, x)|x and (A, E, R, x)|x, obtaining S = S ′ . By Lemma 8.21,E(y ′ , z ′ ), S = S ′ .Lemma 8.24 Let (A, E, R, x) be a system. Then y ∈ A ∧¬E(y,x) ↔(∃z)(R(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#).proof Let A, E, R, x be as given. For the forward direction, it suffices toshow that B = {y ∈ A: E(y,x) ∨ (∃z)(R(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#)} contains [x] and isclosed under E,R predecessors. Closure under E predecessors is obvious. Nowlet R(u, y), y ∈ B. IfE(y,x), then R(u, x) ∧ u ∈ x#, and so u ∈ B. SupposeR(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#. Then u ∈ z#, and so u ∈ B.Conversely, let R(z, x) ∧ y ∈ z#. Suppose E(y,x). Then R(z, y), y ∈ z#, z ∈z#, contradicting Lemma 8.18.Lemma 8.25 Suppose (∀a)(R(a,x) → (∃a ′ )(R ′ (a ′ , x ′ ) ∧ (A, E, R, x)|a ≈ (A ′ ,E ′ , R ′ , x ′ )|a ′ )), (∀a ′ )(R ′ (a ′ , x ′ ) → (∃a)(R(a, x) ∧ (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ )|a ′ ≈ (A, E, R,x)|a)). Then (A, E, R, x) ≈ (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ ).proof Let A, E, R, x, A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ be as given. By Lemma 8.23, the a ′ inthe first hypothesis is unique up to E ′ . For each a such that R(a,x), let T a bethe unique isomorphism from (A, E, R, x)|a onto (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ )|a ′ , where a ′is uniquely determined up to E ′ . The various T a cohere, according to Lemma8.22. Let T be the union of the various T a . Let T ∗ be T extended by {{:E(x,y) ∧ E ′ (x ′ ,z)}}.By the coherence, T respects E,E ′ and is univalent up to E ′ . By the secondhypothesis, T is onto the a ′ with R ′ (a ′ , x ′ ).Note that dom(T ) is the union of the a#, R(a,x), which, by Lemma 8.24, isA\[x]. Similarly, rng(T ) = A ′ \[x ′ ]. Hence, T ∗ also respects E, E ′ , is univalentup to E ′ , and is onto A ′ .Suppose u, v ∈ A\[x]. Let T (u, u ′ ),T(v, v ′ ). We claim thatR(u, v) ↔ R ′ (u ′ ,v ′ ).To see this, let u ∈ a#, R(a,x), v ∈ b#, R(b, x). Suppose R(u, v). Then u ∈ b#,and so u, v ∈ dom(T b ). By coherence, T b (u, u ′ ), T b (v, v ′ ). Hence, R ′ (u ′ , v ′ ). Theconverse is analogous.We also claim thatR(u, x) ↔ R ′ (u ′ ,x ′ )R(x,v) ↔ R ′ (x ′ ,v ′ ).Suppose R(u, x). Let u ∗ be such that R ′ (u ∗ , x ′ ) and (A, E, R, x)|u ≈ (A ′ , E ′ ,R ′ , x ′ )|u ∗ . Then T u (u, u ∗ ), and so T (u, u ∗ ). By coherence, E ′ (u ′ ,u ∗ ). Hence,R(u ′ , x ′ ).Note that x /∈ a#, x ′ /∈ b#, making the second equivalence vacuously true.This is because if x ∈ a# ∨ x ′ ∈ b#, then x is a maximal element of a# ∨ x ′ isa maximal element of b#, violating Lemma 8.18. From this we see that T is anisomorphism relation from (A, E, R, x) onto (A ′ , E ′ , R ′ , x ′ ).