Heller M, Woodin W.H. (eds.) Infinity. New research frontiers (CUP, 2011)(ISBN 1107003873)(O)(327s)_MAml_
Heller M, Woodin W.H. (eds.) Infinity. New research frontiers (CUP, 2011)(ISBN 1107003873)(O)(327s)_MAml_ Heller M, Woodin W.H. (eds.) Infinity. New research frontiers (CUP, 2011)(ISBN 1107003873)(O)(327s)_MAml_
108 the realm of the infiniteBut on close inspection, one realizes that this is not really a justification at all. Thesentence above is meaningful in the generic multiverse view of truth, but there is noexplanation of why it is true. This is exactly as is the case for the sentence that assertsthat the formal theoryZF + “There is a weak Reinhardt cardinal.”,is consistent.To evaluate more fully the generic multiverse position, one must understand thelogical relation T φ. In particular, a natural question arises: is there a correspondingproof relation?4.4.2 The ConjectureI define the proof relation, T ⊢ φ. This requires a preliminary notion that a set ofreals be universally Baire (Feng, Magidor, and Woodin 1992). In fact, I shall defineT ⊢ φ, assuming the existence of a proper class of Woodin cardinals and exploitingthe fact that there are a number of (equivalent) definitions. Without the assumptionthat there is a proper class of Woodin cardinals, the definition is a bit more technical(Woodin 2004). Recall that if S is a compact Hausdorff space, then a set X ⊆ S has theproperty of Baire in the space S if there exists an open set O ⊆ S such that symmetricdifference,X△O,is meager in S (contained in a countable union of closed sets with empty interior).Definition 15. A set A ⊂ R is universally Baire if for all compact Hausdorffspaces, S, and for all continuous functions,F : S → R,the preimage of A by F has the property of Baire in the space S.Suppose that A ⊆ R is universally Baire. Suppose that M is a countable transitivemodel of ZFC. Then M is strongly A-closed if for all countable transitive sets N suchthat N is a generic extension of M,A ∩ N ∈ N.Definition 16. Suppose there is a proper class of Woodin cardinals. Supposethat T is a countable theory in the language of set theory and φ is a sentence.Then T ⊢ φ if there exists a set A ⊂ R such that(1) A is universally Baire,(2) for all countable transitive models, M,ifM is strongly A-closed and T ∈ M, thenM “T φ.”Assuming there is a proper class of Woodin cardinals, the relation, T ⊢ φ,isgenerically absolute. Moreover, Soundness holds as well.
- Page 196: possible collapse of contemporary m
- Page 200: possible collapse of contemporary m
- Page 208: CHAPTER 4The Realm of the InfiniteW
- Page 212: the realm of the finite 91Now the c
- Page 216: the realm of the finite 93By the us
- Page 220: eyond the finite realm 95Set Theori
- Page 224: eyond the finite realm 97of set the
- Page 228: Theorem 5 (Kunen).beyond the finite
- Page 232: eyond the finite realm 101(as a new
- Page 236: the generic multiverse of sets 103L
- Page 240: the generic multiverse of sets 105F
- Page 244: the generic multiverse of sets 107i
- Page 250: 110 the realm of the infiniteTheore
- Page 254: 112 the realm of the infiniteThis a
- Page 258: 114 the realm of the infiniteThe de
- Page 262: 116 the realm of the infiniteSuppos
- Page 266: 118 the realm of the infiniteRefere
- Page 270: 120 a potential subtlety concerning
- Page 274: 122 a potential subtlety concerning
- Page 278: 124 a potential subtlety concerning
- Page 282: 126 a potential subtlety concerning
- Page 286: 128 a potential subtlety concerning
- Page 290: CHAPTER 6Concept Calculus: MuchBett
- Page 294: 132 concept calculus: much better t
108 the realm of the infiniteBut on close inspection, one realizes that this is not really a justification at all. Thesentence above is meaningful in the generic multiverse view of truth, but there is noexplanation of why it is true. This is exactly as is the case for the sentence that assertsthat the formal theoryZF + “There is a weak Reinhardt cardinal.”,is consistent.To evaluate more fully the generic multiverse position, one must understand thelogical relation T φ. In particular, a natural question arises: is there a correspondingproof relation?4.4.2 The ConjectureI define the proof relation, T ⊢ φ. This requires a preliminary notion that a set ofreals be universally Baire (Feng, Magidor, and <strong>Woodin</strong> 1992). In fact, I shall defineT ⊢ φ, assuming the existence of a proper class of <strong>Woodin</strong> cardinals and exploitingthe fact that there are a number of (equivalent) definitions. Without the assumptionthat there is a proper class of <strong>Woodin</strong> cardinals, the definition is a bit more technical(<strong>Woodin</strong> 2004). Recall that if S is a compact Hausdorff space, then a set X ⊆ S has theproperty of Baire in the space S if there exists an open set O ⊆ S such that symmetricdifference,X△O,is meager in S (contained in a countable union of closed sets with empty interior).Definition 15. A set A ⊂ R is universally Baire if for all compact Hausdorffspaces, S, and for all continuous functions,F : S → R,the preimage of A by F has the property of Baire in the space S.Suppose that A ⊆ R is universally Baire. Suppose that M is a countable transitivemodel of ZFC. Then M is strongly A-closed if for all countable transitive sets N suchthat N is a generic extension of M,A ∩ N ∈ N.Definition 16. Suppose there is a proper class of <strong>Woodin</strong> cardinals. Supposethat T is a countable theory in the language of set theory and φ is a sentence.Then T ⊢ φ if there exists a set A ⊂ R such that(1) A is universally Baire,(2) for all countable transitive models, M,ifM is strongly A-closed and T ∈ M, thenM “T φ.”Assuming there is a proper class of <strong>Woodin</strong> cardinals, the relation, T ⊢ φ,isgenerically absolute. Moreover, Soundness holds as well.