12.07.2015 Views

the role of sexually transmitted diseases in hiv transmission

the role of sexually transmitted diseases in hiv transmission

the role of sexually transmitted diseases in hiv transmission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REVIEWSTable 2 | Types <strong>of</strong> <strong>sexually</strong> <strong>transmitted</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectionsCharacteristicsAetiological agentsSystemic <strong>in</strong>fections without mucosal disease HIV, hepatitis B, cytomegalovirusGenital ulcers Haemophilus ducreyi, herpes simplex virus 1 and 2,Treponema pallidumMucosal <strong>in</strong>flammationNeisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vag<strong>in</strong>alisChanges <strong>in</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>lial cellsHuman papillomavirusMUCOSAL NEOPLASMUsually carc<strong>in</strong>omas, such ascervical carc<strong>in</strong>omas, that areassociated with certa<strong>in</strong> types<strong>of</strong> HIV.COHORT STUDIESStudies <strong>in</strong> which subsets <strong>of</strong> adef<strong>in</strong>ed population areidentified.CHANCROID LESIONSS<strong>in</strong>gle or multiple pa<strong>in</strong>ful,necrotiz<strong>in</strong>g ulcers at <strong>the</strong> site <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>fection, which are frequentlyaccompanied by pa<strong>in</strong>ful swell<strong>in</strong>gand suppuration <strong>of</strong> regionallymph nodes.ADJUSTED-ODDS RATIOThe estimated odds ratio afterany confound<strong>in</strong>g factors havebeen taken <strong>in</strong>to account.<strong>the</strong> CCR5 receptor and are highly resistant to HIV<strong>in</strong>fection 48 ;conversely, higher expression <strong>of</strong> CCR5co-receptors might be associated with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>susceptibility to HIV <strong>in</strong>fection 49 .Some differences <strong>in</strong> susceptibility could be relatedto gender. There is evidence that women mightbecome <strong>in</strong>fected with more HIV variants than men or<strong>in</strong>fants 50 .Different viral variants were found <strong>in</strong> 20 <strong>of</strong>32 recently HIV-<strong>in</strong>fected women compared with 0<strong>of</strong> 10 recently <strong>in</strong>fected men. These viral variants werefound before seroconversion, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y didnot develop after immune selective pressure, and werenot co-<strong>in</strong>fections from multiple partners 51 .It is stillunknown what causes this tendency towards <strong>in</strong>fectionwith multiple viral variants <strong>in</strong> women 51 .The proposed <strong>role</strong> that female sexual hormonesmight have <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectiousness has already been discussed.O<strong>the</strong>r studies have documented <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> femalesexual hormones <strong>in</strong> susceptibility to HIV <strong>in</strong>fection.Progesterone <strong>the</strong>rapy <strong>in</strong>creases susceptibility to simianimmunodeficiency virus (SIV) <strong>in</strong> macaques — possiblyow<strong>in</strong>g to a th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vag<strong>in</strong>al epi<strong>the</strong>lium 52 .Treatment <strong>of</strong> ovariectomized macaques with subcutaneousoestrogen protected <strong>the</strong> animals from vag<strong>in</strong>alSIV challenge 52 , lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> authors to conclude thattopical vag<strong>in</strong>al oestrogen might be useful <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>gHIV susceptibility <strong>in</strong> post-menopausal women orwomen receiv<strong>in</strong>g only progesterone.STDs and HIV <strong>transmission</strong>STDs can be divided <strong>in</strong>to four categories: those that produceno mucosal signs or symptoms; those that producevary<strong>in</strong>g degrees <strong>of</strong> mucosal <strong>in</strong>flammation; those thatproduce genital ulcers; and those that cause epi<strong>the</strong>lialcellchanges and/or MUCOSAL NEOPLASM (TABLE 2). The<strong>in</strong>teraction between <strong>the</strong>se ‘traditional’ STD pathogensand HIV has attracted a great deal <strong>of</strong> attention, andhas been referred to as ‘epidemiological synergy’ 34 .HIV can <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> prevalence or manifestations<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r STDs, and o<strong>the</strong>r STDs can have an impacton HIV <strong>transmission</strong>. There is compell<strong>in</strong>g evidencefor <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> STDs on <strong>the</strong> <strong>transmission</strong> <strong>of</strong>HIV 34–36 .However, it has been difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>ewhe<strong>the</strong>r an <strong>in</strong>dividual STD <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectiousness<strong>of</strong> HIV, <strong>the</strong> susceptibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals to HIVor (more than likely) to both HIV and an STD, or todeterm<strong>in</strong>e which STD has <strong>the</strong> greatest effect on HIV<strong>transmission</strong>.A remarkable number <strong>of</strong> epidemiological studieshave been undertaken to l<strong>in</strong>k STDs and HIV 5,34–36 .In<strong>the</strong>ir review, Flem<strong>in</strong>g and Wasserheit 34 exam<strong>in</strong>edSTDs and HIV <strong>transmission</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> studies<strong>of</strong> biological plausibility, COHORT STUDIES and cl<strong>in</strong>icaltrials. The greatest attention has been directed towardscohort studies that focus on HIV acquisition and‘attributable risk’ 34 .In such studies, <strong>the</strong> HIV status <strong>of</strong> astudy subject is determ<strong>in</strong>ed toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> history orrecord <strong>of</strong> detection <strong>of</strong> an STD. By compar<strong>in</strong>g STDs <strong>in</strong>subjects with and without HIV <strong>in</strong>fection, <strong>the</strong> contribution<strong>of</strong> STDs can be estimated. The problems with thisapproach <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> historicaldata as a proxy for an STD; <strong>the</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>STD assays that are available; and an <strong>in</strong>ability to detectco-<strong>transmission</strong> <strong>of</strong> HIV and STD pathogens 34–36 .To exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> STDs fur<strong>the</strong>r, we will attemptto ‘deconstruct’ <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> STDs on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectiousnessand susceptibility <strong>of</strong> HIV.STDs and <strong>in</strong>fectiousnessThe effects <strong>of</strong> an STD on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectiousness <strong>of</strong> HIVcould be measured prospectively, but such work has notbeen undertaken so far. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, several <strong>in</strong>directapproaches have been used.Effects on HIV shedd<strong>in</strong>g. It is possible to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> STD pathogens on <strong>the</strong> excretion <strong>of</strong> HIV <strong>in</strong>genital secretions. On <strong>the</strong> basis that <strong>the</strong> concentration<strong>of</strong> HIV <strong>in</strong> genital secretions determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> probability<strong>of</strong> <strong>transmission</strong>, <strong>the</strong> direct measurement <strong>of</strong> HIV seemsto be a reasonable proxy, both <strong>in</strong> men and women.However, <strong>the</strong>re are technical limitations to thisapproach 5,36 , <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g difficulty sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> femalegenital tract, contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> genital secretions withblood and variability between different assays 27 .Additionally, it rema<strong>in</strong>s unclear whe<strong>the</strong>r HIV is <strong>transmitted</strong>by <strong>in</strong>fected cells or by cell-free virus.STDs that cause ulcers generally <strong>in</strong>crease shedd<strong>in</strong>g(detection) <strong>of</strong> HIV <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> genital tract 34–36,53 .This canoccur by direct shedd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> HIV from <strong>the</strong> ulcerativelesion. HIV has been detected by culture and PCR from<strong>the</strong> exudate <strong>of</strong> CHANCROID LESIONS 54 .Studies <strong>in</strong> female sexworkers showed a 3.9 ADJUSTED-ODDS RATIO for shedd<strong>in</strong>gHIV <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a vag<strong>in</strong>al or cervical ulcer 33 .Thelesions need not be purely <strong>in</strong>fectious <strong>in</strong> nature to havean effect — ulcerations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cervix that are associatedwith treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>traepi<strong>the</strong>lial lesions were found to<strong>in</strong>crease HIV levels 55 . GUD can also affect HIV levels <strong>in</strong>semen by affect<strong>in</strong>g systemic viral loads or <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glocal <strong>in</strong>flammation. In a study <strong>in</strong> Malawi, men withgenital ulcers and non-gonococcal urethritis were foundto shed higher amounts <strong>of</strong> HIV <strong>in</strong> semen comparedwith men with urethritis alone 56 .36 | JANUARY 2004 | VOLUME 2 www.nature.com/reviews/micro

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!