12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2 Method B: MDOF Residual Displacement MethodThis method introduces residual displacement U res as an intermediate responseparameter to improve the PSDM relating bridge-level engineering responseparameters and earthquake intensity (IM). Analytical simulations were then used torelate residual displacement <strong>of</strong> the bridge and its vertical and horizontal load carryingcapacity degradation due to a combination <strong>of</strong> material and geometric nonlinearities.The resulting DV fragility formulation is shown in Equation 6.[ ] [ | ] [ | ] [ | ] [ |resres ]P DV IM = ∫∫∫ P DV DM dP DM EDP dP EDP U dP U IM (6)Once again, it is assumed that the EDP can be conditioned solely on U res , withoutany additional IM information. While there is lower uncertainty in the EDP|U rescorrelation, this method also suffers from large model error due to the largeuncertainty in the residual displacement demand model. However, it does provide amore realistic prediction <strong>of</strong> the onset <strong>of</strong> bridge-level damage. Comparison between allfour methods for a DV limit state <strong>of</strong> 25% traffic volume loss is shown in Figure 6.5.3 Method C: SDOF Residual Displacement MethodThis method is equivalent to Method B, except the residual displacements areobtained from residual displacement spectra (Kawashima et al., 1998) rather thananalysis <strong>of</strong> actual bridge models. This method was affected to reduce the uncertaintyin the residual displacement demand model. The single-degree-<strong>of</strong>-freedom (SDOF)oscillator properties were selected based on the initial elastic period <strong>of</strong> the bridge andan R-factor obtained from demand model simulations. While the method does resultin slightly reduced uncertainty, the median prediction is largely dependent on theselection <strong>of</strong> SDOF oscillator properties.5.4 Method D: EDP Conditioning MethodIn an attempt to further reduce the interim uncertainty (model error), maximumdisplacement U max is introduced and correlated with residual displacement U res . Thisis achieved by integrating over maximum displacement and residual displacement inthe third term <strong>of</strong> Equation 5. The expanded third term is shown in Equation 7.Application <strong>of</strong> Equation 7 requires the EDP to be conditioned on U res only (no U maxinformation), and U res to be conditioned on U max only (no IM information). This wasverified by showing that dependence <strong>of</strong> the residuals on U max and IM, respectively, issmall.[ ] [ | ] [ |max ] [ |resresmax ]P EDP IM = ∫∫ P EDP U dP U U dP U IM(7)61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!