12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HAZARD, GROUND MOTIONS AND PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENTSFOR PBSDAllin CORNELL 1ABSTRACTPerformance-based seismic design (PBSD) requires an integration <strong>of</strong> the response and behavior<strong>of</strong> the structure itself with a representation <strong>of</strong> the seismic threat to the site and a representation<strong>of</strong> the ground motions that will excite the structure. Further PBSD should assess the likelihoods<strong>of</strong> possible limit states and <strong>of</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> future losses, reflecting the randomness anduncertainty in all the steps in the process from the seismicity through structural response to lossestimation. This paper addresses all these issues but emphasizes the subject <strong>of</strong> representation<strong>of</strong> the ground motion for PBSD, starting from the perspective <strong>of</strong> what the structural analysisobjectives are. This subject includes a focus on the interface between the work <strong>of</strong> theseismologist and that <strong>of</strong> the structural engineer.Keywords: Seismic hazard; Ground motions; Uncertainty analysis.1. INTRODUCTIONFollowing, for example, the vision <strong>of</strong> the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research(<strong>PEER</strong>) Center (e.g., Deierlein, 2004; Krawinkler, 2004, Miranda (2004)) it ispresumed here that the ultimate objective <strong>of</strong> seismic performance assessment <strong>of</strong>structures (whether existing or designs for proposed structures) is the determination <strong>of</strong>decision metrics such as the mean annual loss (in economic and/or life safety terms)and/or mean annual frequency (or probability) <strong>of</strong> certain limit states, such as globalinstability collapse or maximum interstory drift ratio (MIDR) greater than 5%.Further, looking to current advanced and future practice, it is assumed here that thebasis for these assessments will by non-linear “time history” structural analysis. Ascommissioned by the workshop convenors this paper will address two general areas,first, the “front end” input to such assessments and, second, the global subject <strong>of</strong>probabilistic analysis in performance-based seismic assessments (PBSA). The paperaddresses the workshop theme <strong>of</strong> performance-based seismic design (PBSD)indirectly in that it is assumed that such an detailed assessment is a step, perhaps onlya near-final confirmatory step, in PBSD.1 Dept. <strong>of</strong> Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford <strong>University</strong>, Stanford, CA, 94305-4020, USA39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!