Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Name ofSpecimenTable 2. Comparison of prediction and test resultsClosing467OpeningObserved Predicted Observed PredictedM testk•NmFail.modeM calck•NmM test------------M calcM j /M bM testk•NmFail.modeM calck•NmM test------------M calcM j /M bReferenceL-BH1 202 J 248 0.81 0.91(J) 145 J 154 0.94 0.84(J) TabataL-BH2 218 J 248 0.88 0.91(J) 144 J 154 0.93 0.84(J) (2001)L-BU 285 J 272 1.04 0.98(J) 171 J 172 0.99 0.96(J)L-BP 221 T 272 0.81 0.98(J) 181 J 172 1.05 0.96(J)L-PP 279 J 272 1.03 0.98(J) 214 J 172 1.24 0.96(J)Mazzoni 1 105 (J)*1 122 0.86 0.95(J) 55 (T) 85 0.64 0.86(J) MazzoniMazzoni 2 106 (J) 130 0.82 1.00(B) 61 (T) 94 0.65 0.96(J) (1991)Mazzoni r 132 (B) 131 1.01 1.05(B) 114a (B) 111a*2 1.02 0.96(J)LP15-1 125 (J) 145 0.86 0.99(J) 89 B 98 0.90 0.89(J) AotaLP15-2 115 (J) 145 0.80 0.99(J) 89 B 98 0.91 0.89(J) (2001)LP15-3 118 (J) 145 0.82 0.99(J) 88 B 98 0.90 0.89(J)LP18-1 136 (J) 145 0.94 0.99(J) 100 B 98 1.02 0.89(J)LP18-2 117 (J) 122 0.96 1.02(B) 83 B 84 0.98 0.91(J)LP18-3 75 T 122 0.61 1.02(B) 90 B 84 1.07 0.91(J)LP16-4 185 J 180 1.03 0.96(J) 126 B 123 1.03 0.85(J)LP20-5 122 B 116 1.05 1.12(B) 79 B 83 0.95 1.08(B)Knee J1 41 (B) 42 0.97 1.02(B) 33 (J) 33 1.02 0.90(J) MeggetKnee J2 40 (B) 42 0.96 1.02(B) 34 (J) 33 1.04 0.90(J) (1998)Knee J3 49 (B) 51 0.96 1.12(B) 41 (B) 43 0.95 1.04(B)Knee J4 48 (B) 51 0.94 1.10(B) 31 (B) 29 1.07 1.17(B)Knee J6 51 (B) 50 1.01 1.12(B) 34 a (B) 40a 0.85 1.07(B)Knee J7 73 (B) 81 0.89 1.05(B) 60 (J) 66 0.92 0.94(J)Knee J9 47 (B) 52 0.92 1.05(B) 34 a (J) a39 0.87 0.94(J)Knee J10 50 (B) 52 0.98 1.04(B) 35 a (B) 39a 0.91 0.94(J)Knee J14 55 (B) 51 1.09 1.13(B) 37 a (J) a40 0.92 1.08(B)L-1 213 B 159 1.34 1.16(B) 128 B 102 1.26 1.08(B) NakazawaL-2 234 B 190 1.23 1.25(B) 146 B 117 1.25 1.22(B) (2002)L-3 125 B 109 1.15 1.17(B) 78 B 69 1.13 1.11(B)L-4 213 B 162 1.31 1.30(B) 127 B 98 1.30 1.31(B)L-5 195 B 159 1.23 1.16(B) 128 B 102 1.26 1.08(B)L-6 209 B 159 1.32 1.16(B) 125 B 102 1.23 1.08(B)L-7 209 B 159 1.32 1.16(B) 130 B 102 1.28 1.08(B)L-8 388 BJ 394 0.98 1.00(B) 233 BJ 232 1.00 0.85(J)L-9 422 BJ 400 1.05 1.07(B) 266 BJ 254 1.05 0.95(J)L-10 408 BJ 399 1.02 1.04(B) 253 BJ 249 1.01 0.93(J)L-11 407 BJ 399 1.02 1.04(B) 256 BJ 249 1.03 0.93(J)L-1 68 BJ 82 0.84 0.99(J) 48 BJ 55 0.86 0.88(J) CuiL-2 53 T 82 0.65 0.99(J) 44 BJ 55 0.79 0.88(J) (2003)L-3 77 BJ 82 0.95 0.99(J) 57 BJ 55 1.03 0.88(J)L-4 49 T 85 0.58 1.02(B) 57 BJ 55 1.02 0.88(J)L-5 52 T 85 0.61 1.02(B) 70a BJ 76a 0.92 0.79(J)L-6 87 BJ 85 1.03 1.02(B) 78a BJ 93a 0.85 0.72(J)L345-30-3 180 B 171 1.05 1.29(B) 117 B 92 1.27 1.53(B) InoueL345-30-3w 180 B 168 1.07 1.24(B) 120 B 95 1.26 1.38(B) (2003)L345-60-4 247 B 224 1.10 1.24(B) 164 B 126 1.30 1.36(B)L490-60-3 233 B 228 1.02 1.24(B) 156 B 129 1.21 1.34(B)L-180-S 33 T 71 0.46 0.89(J) 30 T 51 0.58 0.86(J) OkanoL-180-L 46 T 71 0.64 0.89(J) 29 T 51 0.58 0.86(J) (2003)LP-180-S 33 T 71 0.46 0.89(J) 26 T 51 0.50 0.86(J)L-90-S 31 T 71 0.43 0.89(J) 22 T 51 0.43 0.86(J)OT36B-T 194 B 264 0.73 1.03(B) 145 B 158 0.92 0.85(J) Nakamura(2003)*1 Observed failure mode were classified into J (joint shear failure), B(beam yielding failure) BJ (combination of B and J) or T(preamature anchorage failure) based on the decription in each report, while the notation in (parensis) means the observed failuremode is not clearly described in the report and determined by the author based on failure pattern and its load-deflection relation.*2 Specimens with notation a contains inclined bar in reentrant corner, the tensile capacity of the inclined bar were added to theestimated tensile capacity of longitudinal bars.