12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

well as the material properties. The specified properties were used for the design andanalysis <strong>of</strong> the two buildings, except for the model validation part <strong>of</strong> the study whichwas based on the measured material properties from the PRESSS building. The beamsand columns in HFB1 and HFB2 were dimensioned to experience similar maximumshear stresses in the interior beam-to-column joints. As with the PRESSS building,the two hybrid buildings were designed with steel plate connections between thefloors and seismic frames and hybrid connections between the columns and footings.Table 1. A summary <strong>of</strong> member dimensions and material propertiesParameter HFB1 (DBD) HFB2 (FBD)Column (width x depth) 18 in. x 18 in. 20 in. x 20 in.Beam (width x depth) 14 in. x 23 in. 16 in. x 27 in.Unconfined concrete strength, f ’ c 8.8 ksi * (5 ksi † ) 5 ksi †Mild steel reinforcementYield strength, f syUltimate strength, f suPost-tensioning tendonYield strength, f pyInitial stress after losses, f pi60 ksi † (68 ksi * )60 ksi †98 ksi * 98 ksi *255 ksi *255 ksi *119 ksi † 119 ksi †Grout strength 10 ksi † (9.3 ksi * ) 10 ksi †† specified properties in design; * measured properties.Table 2. A summary <strong>of</strong> hybrid frame connection detailsLocationHFB1 (DBD)HFB2 (FBD)A s (in 2 ) A pt (in 2 ) A s (in 2 ) A pt (in 2 )Floor 1 0.88 0.918 1.24 1.071Floor 2 0.62 0.765 0.93 0.918Floor 3 0.62 0.765 0.88 0.918Floor 4 0.54 0.531 0.62 0.612Floor 5 0.54 0.531 0.62 0.612Column baseExterior: 0.88 Exterior: 2.50 Exterior:1.24 Exterior: 2.50Interior: 0.88 Interior: 2.50 Interior: 1.24 Interior: 2.503. ANALYTICAL MODELSFor the analysis <strong>of</strong> both buildings, 2-D models were developed using the computerprogram RUAUMOKO (Carr 2002) and only one seismic frame was included in eachmodel. In series with the seismic frame, a pin-based fictitious column was alsomodeled. By lumping the seismic mass at the floor levels <strong>of</strong> the fictitious column andmodeling the floor connections with spring elements between the column and seismic448

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!