12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXTENSIONS OF THE N2 METHOD — ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS,INFILLED FRAMES AND INCREMENTAL N2Peter FAJFAR, Matjaž DOLŠEK, Damjan MARUŠIĆ and Iztok PERUŠ 1ABSTRACTThe N2 method is a relatively simple seismic analysis technique based on pushover analysisand inelastic response spectrum approach. Its basic variant is based on a number <strong>of</strong>assumptions, which impose restrictions to its applicability to general structural systems. Recentresearch has been aimed to extending the applicability <strong>of</strong> the method to plan-asymmetricbuildings and to infilled reinforced concrete frames. Moreover, the incremental N2 (IN2)method has been developed as a simple alternative to incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Inthe paper, the basic N2 method and the three extensions are summarised.Keywords: Simplified non-linear analysis; Inelastic spectra; Reduction factors; Torsion;Infilled frames.1. INTRODUCTIONIn recent years, a breakthrough <strong>of</strong> simplified inelastic analysis and performanceevaluation methods has occurred. Such methods combine the non-linear static(pushover) analysis <strong>of</strong> a multi degree-<strong>of</strong>-freedom (MDOF) model and the responsespectrum analysis <strong>of</strong> an equivalent single-degree-<strong>of</strong>-freedom (SDOF) model. Theycan be used for a variety <strong>of</strong> purposes such as design verification for new buildingsand bridges, damage assessment for existing structures, determination <strong>of</strong> basicstructural characteristics in direct displacement based design, and rapid evaluation <strong>of</strong>global structural response to seismic ground motion <strong>of</strong> different intensities. Anexample is the capacity spectrum method (CSM), developed by Freeman (1998) andimplemented in different variants in different regulatory documents in the USA and inJapan. Another example is the N2 method, which has been implemented into the finalversion <strong>of</strong> the Eurocode 8 standard (CEN 2003).The simple basic variant <strong>of</strong> the N2 method cannot be applied to some structuralsystems with specific structural behaviour, e.g., to infilled reinforced concrete (RC)frames. Moreover, the basic variant <strong>of</strong> the N2 method is, like other simplified non-1 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Jamova 2, SI-1000, Slovenia357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!