12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(3) Calculate cumulative scale factor from Eq.8 and check if it exceeded unity. If(p)exceeded, calculate the incremental scale factor, ∆F % , from Eq.15 for the finalpushover step. If not, continue with the next stage.(4) Calculate all response quantities <strong>of</strong> interest developed at the end <strong>of</strong> thepushover step from the generic expression <strong>of</strong> Eq.14. If the final pushover step hasbeen reached, terminate the analysis. If not, continue with the next stage.(5) Modify the current second-order stiffness matrix by considering the lastyielded hinge identified at Stage (2) and return to Stage (1) for the next pushover step.3. ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES3.1 3-D Pushover Analysis <strong>of</strong> a 9-Story Building with Mass EccentricityThe first example is the 9-story benchmark steel building with basement designed forthe Los Angeles area as part <strong>of</strong> the SAC project (Gupta and Krawinkler 1999). It hasfour identical moment resisting perimeter frames on each side as shown in Fig. 2a.Other details <strong>of</strong> modeling are given elsewhere (Aydinoglu, 2004). In order to create a3-D mono-symmetrical response, mass centers <strong>of</strong> all floors are shifted eastward by anon-dimensional eccentricity <strong>of</strong> e=0.15. Earthquake ground motion is applied in N-Sdirection and defined through a standard response spectrum (ASCE 2000) with shortperiodand one-second spectral accelerations being 1.375 g and 0.80 g, respectively.Taking P-delta effects into account, 8 vibration modes are considered to adequatelyrepresent the coupled lateral-torsional response using CQC modal combination rule.Fig. 2b shows modal capacity diagrams with implementation <strong>of</strong> equal displacementrule. Fig. 2c, 2d, 2e show variations <strong>of</strong> peak floor displacements, story drift ratios andright-end beam plastic hinge rotations at central spans, respectively. Peak flooraccelerations are shown in Fig. 2f. Response quantities are given for each perimeterframe and centre <strong>of</strong> mass (CM) where applicable. Intensity/demand curves are plottedin Fig. 2g in terms <strong>of</strong> maximum story drift ratios where the vertical axis indicates theseismic intensity measure (IM) defined as first-mode elastic spectral acceleration.(a)West(b)eSouthCMNorthEastFigure 2. (a) Plan <strong>of</strong> 9-story steel building, (b) modal capacity diagrams,353

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!