12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

preferably linearized in a piecewise fashion, i.e., they are represented by finitenumber <strong>of</strong> lines or planes in two- and three-dimensional models, respectively.Once the incremental scale factor is determined, the new value <strong>of</strong> the cumulativescale factor is calculated from Eq.8 and any response quantity <strong>of</strong> interest developed atthe end <strong>of</strong> the (i)’th pushover step is obtained from the generic expression <strong>of</strong> Eq.14. Ifrequired, increments <strong>of</strong> modal displacements and modal pseudo-accelerations can becalculated from Eq.6 and Eq.4, respectively. Adding to those calculated at the end <strong>of</strong>the previous step, the new coordinates <strong>of</strong> all modal capacity diagrams may beobtained simultaneously from Eqs.5.2.4 Estimating Seismic Demand: Peak Response QuantitiesThe above-described pushover-history procedure is repeated until cumulativespectrum scale factor defined by Eq.8 exceeds unity at the end <strong>of</strong> a given pushoverstep. When such a step is detected, which is indicated by superscript (p), incrementalscale factor corresponding to this final pushover step is re-calculated from Eq.8 as∆F%(p) (p 1)= 1 − F% −(15)Peak value <strong>of</strong> the generic response quantity is again obtained from Eq.14 for i = p.2.5 Summary <strong>of</strong> Practical Implementation <strong>of</strong> IRSAA detailed derivation <strong>of</strong> IRSA is presented above for the sake <strong>of</strong> completeness. Notethat the actual practical implementation <strong>of</strong> the procedure based on lumped plasticitymodel combined with smoothed response spectrum and equal displacement rule isvery simple and transparent. The analysis stages to be applied at each pushover step<strong>of</strong> IRSA are summarized in the following:(1) Run a linear response spectrum analysis (RSA) with a sufficient number <strong>of</strong>modes by considering the instantaneous second-order stiffness matrix correspondingto the current plastic hinge configuration. Preferably use a matrix transformationmethod (e.g., Jacobi method) in free-vibration analysis to accommodate singular or(1)negative-definite matrices. Use the same spectral displacements, Sden, at all pushoversteps as seismic input, which are defined only once at the first pushover step as elasticspectral displacements. Alternatively, compatible spectral pseudo-accelerationsdefined at each step by Eq.9 may be used. Obtain all response quantities <strong>of</strong> interest,(i)r% , by applying an appropriate modal combination rule (e.g., CQC rule — Eq.13).(2) Specialize the generic expression <strong>of</strong> Eq.14 for the response quantities thatdefine the coordinates <strong>of</strong> the yield surfaces <strong>of</strong> all potential plastic hinges, i.e., biaxialbending moments and axial forces in a general, three-dimensional response <strong>of</strong> a(0)framed structure. Response quantities due to gravity loading are considered as r in(i)the first pushover step. Calculate the incremental scale factor, ∆F % , according to theyield conditions <strong>of</strong> all potential plastic hinges and identify the new yielded hinge.352

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!