12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. EVALUATION OF MPA: UNSYMMETRIC-PLAN BUILDINGSComputed were the seismic demands resulting from one <strong>of</strong> the SAC ground motionsfor the SAC-Los Angeles 9-story building, a symmetric-plan system, and three masseccentricsystems, U1, U2, and U3, with different degrees <strong>of</strong> coupling between lateraland torsional motions as characterized by different values <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> uncoupledlateral and torsional vibration periods. Figure 8 shows the story drifts at the right edge<strong>of</strong> the building plan including a variable number <strong>of</strong> “modal” pairs (or “modes” forsymmetric building) in MPA superimposed with the “exact” result from nonlinearRHA. The first “modal” pair (“mode” for symmetric systems) alone is inadequate inestimating the story drifts, especially in the upper stories <strong>of</strong> the building, but with two“modal” pairs included, story drifts estimated by MPA are quite accurate.For the excitation considered, the MPA results are accurate for two unsymmetricsystems, U1 and U3, to a similar degree as they were for the symmetric building,which is apparent by comparing Figs. 8b and d with Fig. 8a; however, the results areless accurate for system U2 (Fig. 8c). Chopra and Goel (2004) demonstrated that thisloss <strong>of</strong> accuracy is not because the system has very close natural periods and strongcoupling <strong>of</strong> the lateral and torsional motions in each mode <strong>of</strong> vibration but becausethe ro<strong>of</strong> displacement <strong>of</strong> system U2 due to the selected ground motion is considerablyunderestimated in the MPA procedure. This discrepancy occurs because theindividual “modal” responses attain their peaks almost simultaneously, a situation for9(a)(b)6Floor3NL−RHAMPA1 "Mode"2 "Modes"3 "Modes"G0 1 2 3 4 5NL−RHAMPA1 "Pair"2 "Pairs"3 "Pairs"0 1 2 3 4 5Floor963(c)NL−RHAMPA1 "Pair"2 "Pairs"3 "Pairs"G0 1 2 3 4 5Story Drift Ratio (%)NL−RHAMPA1 "Pair"2 "Pairs"3 "Pairs"(d)0 1 2 3 4 5Story Drift Ratio (%)Figure 8. Story drifts determined by MPA with variable number <strong>of</strong> “modal”pairs (or modes) and nonlinear RHA: (a) symmetric building; (b), (c), and(d) unsymmetric-plan systems U1, U2, and U3.341

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!