Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley
Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley
The peak modal demands r n are then combined by an appropriate modal combinationrule—SRSS for symmetric-plan buildings and CQC for unsymmetric-plan systems—to estimate the total demand. This procedure is directly applicable to the estimation ofdeformation demands (e.g., floor displacements and story drifts) but computation ofplastic hinge rotations and member forces requires additional consideration.Although modal analysis theory is strictly not valid for inelastic systems, the factthat elastic modes are coupled only weakly in the response of inelastic systems tomodal inertia forces (Chopra and Goel, 2002, 2004) permitted development of MPA,an approximate procedure.3.2 Summary of ProcedureThe MPA procedure has been summarized as a sequence of computational steps toestimate floor displacements and story drifts for symmetric-plan buildings (Goel andChopra, 2004a) and unsymmetric-plan buildings (Chopra and Goel, 2004).3.3 Plastic Hinge Rotations and Member ForcesAlthough the total floor displacements and story drifts are computed by combiningthe values obtained from gravity load and “modal” pushover analyses for all modescontributing significantly to the demand, the plastic hinge rotations and memberforces are not computed by this procedure. The rotations of plastic hinges can beestimated from the story drifts by a procedure presented earlier by Gupta andKrawinkler (1999). The member forces are computed from the total memberdeformations using the member force-deformation (or moment rotation) relationship,recognizing P-M interaction in columns. These procedures to compute member forcesare described in Goel and Chopra (2004b).4. EVALUATION OF MPA: SYMMETRIC-PLAN BUILDINGS4.1 Higher Mode Contributions in Seismic DemandsFigures 3 and 4 show the median values of story drift and beam plastic rotationdemands, respectively, including a variable number of “modes” in MPAsuperimposed with the “exact” result from nonlinear RHA. The first “mode” alone isinadequate in estimating story drifts, but with a few “modes” included, story driftsestimated by MPA are generally similar to the nonlinear RHA results.The first “mode” alone fails to identify the plastic hinging in the upper floors ofall buildings and also in the lower floors of the Seattle 20-story building. Includinghigher-“mode” contributions also improves significantly the estimate of plastic hingerotations. In particular, plastic hinging in upper stories is now identified, and the MPAestimate of plastic rotation is much closer—compared to the first-“mode” result—tothe “exact” results of nonlinear RHA.337
9BostonSeattleLos AngelesFloor63NL−RHAMPA1 "Mode"2 "Modes"3 "Modes"9−StoryG0 0.5 1 1.5 2200 1 2 3 4 50 1 2 3 4 5Floor16128NL−RHAMPA1 "Mode"3 "Modes"5 "Modes"420−StoryG0 0.5 1 1.5 20 1 2 3 4 5Story drift, ∆ MPAor ∆ NL−RHA(%)0 1 2 3 4 5Figure 3. Median story drifts determined by nonlinear RHA and MPA withvariable number of “modes”; P-∆ effects due to gravity loads are included.9SeattleLos AngelesFloor63NL−RHAMPA1 "Mode"2 "Modes"3 "Modes"9−StoryG0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0 0.02 0.04 0.0620Floor16128NL−RHAMPA1 "Mode"3 "Modes"5 "Modes"4G20−Story0 0.02 0.04 0.06Beam Plastic Rotation (rad)0 0.02 0.04 0.06Beam Plastic Rotation (rad)Figure 4. Median plastic rotations in interior beams determined by nonlinearRHA and MPA with variable number of “modes”; P-∆ effects due to gravityloads are included.338
- Page 302 and 303: 15001000500Shear [kN]0-8.0 -6.0 -4.
- Page 304 and 305: 5.1 3D Tests on a Torsionally Unbal
- Page 306 and 307: Non-linear substructuring was recen
- Page 308 and 309: PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT — FR
- Page 310 and 311: 4 x 50 m = 200 mC1 C2 C3h u = 7 mh
- Page 312 and 313: some procedures are (contrary to th
- Page 314 and 315: 5 th floor disp. [cm]0.60.0-0.6CC =
- Page 316 and 317: While the global drift of the build
- Page 318 and 319: the use of such connections in eart
- Page 320 and 321: I d = 0.25elastic limitmaximum resi
- Page 322 and 323: As regards the influence of differe
- Page 324 and 325: ON GROUND MOTION DURATION AND ENGIN
- Page 326 and 327: time between the first and last acc
- Page 328 and 329: FyFyFyFFFkk0.03kδδδcover a large
- Page 330 and 331: T5b, T13a, T13b, T20a and T20b can
- Page 332 and 333: Tabled results show that in the cas
- Page 334 and 335: 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1Dkin PfSa[g]0 0.25
- Page 336 and 337: ON DRIFT LIMITS ASSOCIATED WITH DIF
- Page 338 and 339: BehaviourElasticInelasticCollapseDa
- Page 340 and 341: Other factors such as the applied l
- Page 342 and 343: 4. MOMENT RESISTING FRAMES4.1 Ducti
- Page 344 and 345: 5Ductility factor432100 0.2 0.4 0.6
- Page 346 and 347: 5.1 Flexural Structural WallsAn exa
- Page 348 and 349: MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS: SYMMETRIC-
- Page 350 and 351: Floor963SeattleNonlinear RHAFEMA1st
- Page 354 and 355: 9BostonSeattleLos AngelesFloor63RSA
- Page 356 and 357: 5. EVALUATION OF MPA: UNSYMMETRIC-P
- Page 358 and 359: Without additional conceptual compl
- Page 360 and 361: AN IMPROVED PUSHOVER PROCEDURE FOR
- Page 362 and 363: for a response governed by the fund
- Page 364 and 365: 2.2 Modal ScalingThe principal aim
- Page 366 and 367: 2.3 Pushover-History AnalysisSubsti
- Page 368 and 369: (3) Calculate cumulative scale fact
- Page 370 and 371: 46.4 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58
- Page 372 and 373: EXTENSIONS OF THE N2 METHOD — ASY
- Page 374 and 375: The strength reduction factor due t
- Page 376 and 377: The relations apply to SDOF systems
- Page 378 and 379: in X-direction pushover curves prac
- Page 380 and 381: As an example, an idealized force-d
- Page 382 and 383: The IN2 curve can be used in the pr
- Page 384 and 385: HORIZONTALLY IRREGULAR STRUCTURES:
- Page 386 and 387: Dutta and Das (2002, 2002b and refs
- Page 388 and 389: They tested the procedure on three
- Page 390 and 391: Table 1. Properties of the 4 WallsW
- Page 392 and 393: The following is a summary of two s
- Page 394 and 395: ectangular concrete deck supported
- Page 396 and 397: REFERENCESAlmazan, J. L., and J. C.
- Page 398 and 399: Rosenblueth, E. (1957). “Consider
- Page 400 and 401: instantaneous period of vibration a
The peak modal demands r n are then combined by an appropriate modal combinationrule—SRSS for symmetric-plan buildings and CQC for unsymmetric-plan systems—to estimate the total demand. This procedure is directly applicable to the estimation <strong>of</strong>deformation demands (e.g., floor displacements and story drifts) but computation <strong>of</strong>plastic hinge rotations and member forces requires additional consideration.Although modal analysis theory is strictly not valid for inelastic systems, the factthat elastic modes are coupled only weakly in the response <strong>of</strong> inelastic systems tomodal inertia forces (Chopra and Goel, 2002, 2004) permitted development <strong>of</strong> MPA,an approximate procedure.3.2 Summary <strong>of</strong> ProcedureThe MPA procedure has been summarized as a sequence <strong>of</strong> computational steps toestimate floor displacements and story drifts for symmetric-plan buildings (Goel andChopra, 2004a) and unsymmetric-plan buildings (Chopra and Goel, 2004).3.3 Plastic Hinge Rotations and Member ForcesAlthough the total floor displacements and story drifts are computed by combiningthe values obtained from gravity load and “modal” pushover analyses for all modescontributing significantly to the demand, the plastic hinge rotations and memberforces are not computed by this procedure. The rotations <strong>of</strong> plastic hinges can beestimated from the story drifts by a procedure presented earlier by Gupta andKrawinkler (1999). The member forces are computed from the total memberdeformations using the member force-deformation (or moment rotation) relationship,recognizing P-M interaction in columns. These procedures to compute member forcesare described in Goel and Chopra (2004b).4. EVALUATION OF MPA: SYMMETRIC-PLAN BUILDINGS4.1 Higher Mode Contributions in Seismic DemandsFigures 3 and 4 show the median values <strong>of</strong> story drift and beam plastic rotationdemands, respectively, including a variable number <strong>of</strong> “modes” in MPAsuperimposed with the “exact” result from nonlinear RHA. The first “mode” alone isinadequate in estimating story drifts, but with a few “modes” included, story driftsestimated by MPA are generally similar to the nonlinear RHA results.The first “mode” alone fails to identify the plastic hinging in the upper floors <strong>of</strong>all buildings and also in the lower floors <strong>of</strong> the Seattle 20-story building. Includinghigher-“mode” contributions also improves significantly the estimate <strong>of</strong> plastic hingerotations. In particular, plastic hinging in upper stories is now identified, and the MPAestimate <strong>of</strong> plastic rotation is much closer—compared to the first-“mode” result—tothe “exact” results <strong>of</strong> nonlinear RHA.337