12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5Ductility factor432100 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Storey drift factor (SDF)Figure 5. Correlation between ductility and the storey drift factor.4.2 Nonductile MRFMRF designed to earlier codes or without seismic detailing <strong>of</strong>ten suffer from poorconfinement <strong>of</strong> lap splices, lack <strong>of</strong> shear reinforcement in the beam-column joints andinadequate embedment length <strong>of</strong> the beam bottom reinforcement at the column. Theseframes behave in a nonductile manner and may fail in brittle failure modes. As anexample <strong>of</strong> the data used, the maximum interstorey drift is plotted against the damageindex in Figure 6. The behaviour <strong>of</strong> several frames when subjected to a number <strong>of</strong>ground motions contributed the data shown in the figure. For nonductile MRF, thedamage index corresponding to repairable damage limit is 0.4. This damage levelcorresponds to maximum interstory drift limit <strong>of</strong> 0.5%, which is considered to be thelimit <strong>of</strong> irreparable damage as suggested by experimental observation. The maximuminterstorey drift limits corresponding to various damage states <strong>of</strong> a nonductile MRFare listed in Table 2.1Damage index0.80.60.40.20Existing 3-storey frameExisting 9-storey frameData trend0 1 2 3 4Interstorey drift ratio %Figure 6. Relationship between maximum interstorey drift and damage forexisting nonductile frames.329

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!