12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the use <strong>of</strong> such connections in earthquake resistant steel frames, but it is important torecognize that there is a potential resistance to seismic actions. Even after rupture <strong>of</strong>bolts on the weaker side, connections (and frames) can sustain further earthquakeshocks acting as rigid in one and as pinned in the other direction. Stiffness <strong>of</strong> framesis decreased in this case but a collapse does not occur as long as the resistance is notreached also on the stronger side <strong>of</strong> a connection. An existing three story industrialbuilding suffered rupture <strong>of</strong> bolts at the weaker side <strong>of</strong> two connections but theoverall behavior <strong>of</strong> the frame was not affected importantly.5. TIMBER-FRAME BUILDINGSIn light-frame buildings, shear walls are typically composed <strong>of</strong> wood framing andpanel sheathing attached with dowel-type fasteners, usually nails. The dowel-typemechanical connections are performing in an inelastic manner. Consequently, thebehavior <strong>of</strong> timber-frame wall panels to varying loads is inelastic. Deformability <strong>of</strong>shear wall reflects in elastic deformation <strong>of</strong> sheathing material and framing membersand inelastic deformation <strong>of</strong> fasteners. For modeling the displacement response <strong>of</strong>shear wall it is very important to develop an accurate model for the orthotropicinelastic behavior <strong>of</strong> fasteners in wood materials.5.1 Numerical ModelA two-step macro model for the calculation <strong>of</strong> the entire wood structure response hasbeen developed (Fig. 16). Within the first step (cyclic analysis) each singlewoodframe wall is numerically analyzed on the basis <strong>of</strong> the known inelastic behavior<strong>of</strong> fasteners. The result <strong>of</strong> analysis is a hysteretic response <strong>of</strong> the wall. Based on thisresult, mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> inelastic spring that simulates the behavior <strong>of</strong> aphysical body – woodframe wall are derived. In the second step <strong>of</strong> the analysis(dynamic analysis) the entire building structure is simulated with inelastic springssimulating load-bearing walls. The model is supported by two different s<strong>of</strong>twarepackages, i.e., DRAIN-2DX and CANNY-E. The results <strong>of</strong> two-dimensional analysesperformed by DRAIN-2DX are used for the composition <strong>of</strong> three-dimensionalstructural model suitable for the prediction <strong>of</strong> response <strong>of</strong> analyzed wood framedbuilding. Three-dimensional analysis is performed by CANNY-E program.To model both, structural connectors and equivalent structural struts, an element,called ULS (Universal Longitudinal Spring) has been developed. The physical modelis a longitudinal spring with appropriate length down to infinitely short dimension.The model had been originally developed for the modeling <strong>of</strong> masonry infill <strong>of</strong>reinforced concrete frames (Žarnić 1994) and later modified for the simulation <strong>of</strong>inelastic response <strong>of</strong> nailed sheathing to framing connections (Dujič and Žarnić2003). It applies significantly modified hysteretic rules proposed by the authors <strong>of</strong> theIDARC program (Park et al. 1987) and original skeleton curve with ductility and303

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!