12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Being able to use both a shake table and an actuator to excite the experimentalsubstructure introduces several possibilities for the application <strong>of</strong> the first flooracceleration u&&1and the thirds story force k3( x3 − x2): (a) Apply the accelerationusing the shake table and the force using the actuator.; alternatively (b) Apply theground acceleration using the actuator as well (as in the Effective Force method); (c)Yet another alternative is obtained by rearranging equation (3) as follows:⎡⎤⎢ k⎥m ⎢u&& − x − x + && x ⎥+ c x&+ k x = 0(4)( )32 1 3 2 21 2 21 2 21⎢ m21442443 ⎥⎢ Equivalent acceleration ⎥⎣⎦The equivalent acceleration can be applied using the shake table only. However,the first story acceleration and the third story force can each be divided into twocomponents, one to be applied by the shake table, and the other by the actuator. Theactuator is assumed fixed in the inertial reference frame, while the structure is in anon-inertial frame attached to the shake table. The actions are shown below:k3Shake table acceleration, u&&= α s u&&−αs x −xt( )( ) ( ) ( )1 1 3 3 2m2First story contributionto shake table acceleration1 2First story contributionto actuator force14243144424443Third story contributionto shake table acceleration&& ( ) ( )Actuator Force, Fa=−⎡⎣1−αs ⎤⎦mu1+ ⎡⎣1−α3 s ⎤⎦k3 x3 −x214 424443 144 4244443Third story contributionto actuator forcewhere α 1 (s) and α 3 (s) are frequency dependent splitting function such as for exampleband-pass filters. Such a splitting has several advantages discussed by Kausel (1998),Reinhorn and Sivaselvan (2004). The above substructuring and force splittingstrategies are:• If α1( s) ≠ 0 and α3( s)≠ 0 , then the control requires a shake table and anactuator to implement the substructure testing.• If α1( s) = 0 and α3( s)= 0 , however, two possibilities exist:o In dynamic testing, the inertia is part <strong>of</strong> the experimental system,whereas in pseudo-dynamic testing, inertia effects are computed.o Thus for hybrid testing ( α1( s) ≠0 or α3( s)≠ 0 ) or dynamic hybridtesting, the actuator should operate in force control.Such a unified view <strong>of</strong> hybrid simultaneous computation and experimentation testingsystems provides a better perspective to develop algorithms and s<strong>of</strong>tware.6. DYNAMIC FORCE CONTROLThe implementation <strong>of</strong> the RTDHT requires therefore implementation <strong>of</strong> force controlin the hydraulic actuators. This control is sensitive to the acceleration and force(5)264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!