12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

end work-point to work-point). And ψ is the angle between the horizontal beam andthe brace. Thus, if θ mi is the target drift <strong>of</strong> the i th story calculated from the targetdisplacement pr<strong>of</strong>ile, then the story ductility can be computed from:µi= θmi/ θ(2)yiAfter calculating all the story ductilities from Eq. 2, the average <strong>of</strong> all storyductilities is taken as the system ductility. Second, the beam framing into the bracesare designed by capacity design principle. This requires the consideration <strong>of</strong> thehorizontal brace force components as beam axial loads and the flexural demandresulted from a vertical unbalanced concentrated force <strong>of</strong> 0.1 Ω h P y sin ψ actingupward at the center <strong>of</strong> the beam span as depicted in the free body diagram Fig. 2.Noted that P y is the nominal tensile yield strength <strong>of</strong> brace, the factor <strong>of</strong> 0.1 considersthe 10% difference between the peak compressive and tensile strengths, and Ω hrepresents the effects <strong>of</strong> strain hardening. Applying LRFD specifications:P /( φ u cPn) ≥0. 2 : ( ) 8 ⎡⎛P ⎞ ⎤P / / ⎢ 1⎥ ≤ 1.9⎜⎟0uφcPn+ Mu− φbM(3)n⎣⎝Pe⎠ ⎦2where Pn= FcrAg, π EIP e= , φ 0.75( tension)or 0.85( compression)( kl) 2 c=, φb= 0. 9Note that the bottom beam flange is not laterally braced except by transverse beams atthe center point <strong>of</strong> span. Accordingly, P n and M n in Eq. 3 are conservatively computed(without considering the effects <strong>of</strong> the concrete slab) from an unbraced length <strong>of</strong> 3.5m for the capacity design <strong>of</strong> left beam segment shown in Fig. 2.cos φ *(C+T)/2 cos φ *(C+T)/2TcosφCcosφsin φ *(C-T)/2 sin φT*(C-T)/2CφT sin φC sin φUnbalanced vertical concentrated force=(C-T) sinφ≅ ( β − 1) Ω P sinφFigure 2. Free body diagram <strong>of</strong> a beam supporting the BRBs.The final selections <strong>of</strong> structural members are given in Table 1.Table 1. Selection <strong>of</strong> member sizes and gradesMember Beam Sizes and Core Cross Sectional Area <strong>of</strong> Braces (A572 GR50)Location 1FL 2FL 3FLBeam (mm) H456×201×10×17 H450×200×9×14 H400×200×8×13Brace (cm 2 ) 30 25 15Dimension <strong>of</strong> Columns (A572 Gr.50) unit : mm CFTs: C1: Tube: 350×9, C2: Pipe: 400×400×9hy248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!