12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where D is the maximum drift and N is the number <strong>of</strong> load cycles (computedusing the drift history). Empirical parameters in Eq. 2 are calibrated tominimize the dispersion <strong>of</strong> the data and are defined as follows: a=0.252,b=0.645, c=0.0178, d=0.819.• Joint shear strain in combination with the number <strong>of</strong> load cycles: Afunctional EDP that includes both maximum joint shear strain and number <strong>of</strong>load cycles is considered the most desirable EDP:F +b d= aγ cN(3)where γ defines the maximum joint shear strain, N defines the number <strong>of</strong> loadcycles (computed using the drift history) and empirical parameters are definedas follows: a = 1.46, b = 0.481, c=0.200, d = 0.309.3.2 Damage StatesDamage measures (DMs) describe the damage sustained by a component during anearthquake. In this study, damage is quantized into discrete damage states. Datacharacterizing the development <strong>of</strong> damage in the previously discussed laboratory testspecimens as well as research results, documentation providing guidelines for postearthquakerepair and interviews with pr<strong>of</strong>essional were used to identify a series <strong>of</strong>damage states that (1) best characterize the progression <strong>of</strong> damage in reinforcedconcrete beam-column joints and (2) best determine the appropriate method <strong>of</strong> repairfor the component. These damage states are1. Initial cracking at the beam-column interface2. Initial cracking within the joint area3. Maximum crack width is less than 0.02 in. (5 mm)4. Maximum crack width is greater than 0.02 in. (5 mm)5. Beam longitudinal reinforcement yields6. Maximum crack width is greater than 0.05 in. (1.3 mm)7. Spalling <strong>of</strong> at least 10% joint surface concrete8. Joint shear strength begins to deteriorate9. Spalling <strong>of</strong> more than 30% joint surface concrete10. Cracks extend into the beam and/or column11. Spalling <strong>of</strong> more than 80% joint surface concrete12. Crushing <strong>of</strong> concrete extends into joint core13. Failure due to (a) buckling <strong>of</strong> longitudinal steel reinforcement, (b) loss <strong>of</strong> beamlongitudinal steel anchorage within the joint core, or (c) pull-out <strong>of</strong>discontinuous beam longitudinal steel reinforcement214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!