12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pinto et al., 2004). The probability <strong>of</strong> being in a particular damage band may then beobtained from the difference between the bordering limit state exceedanceprobabilities.3.1 Probabilistic Treatment <strong>of</strong> the DemandThe cumulative distribution function <strong>of</strong> the displacement demand can be found usingthe median displacement demand values and their associated logarithmic standarddeviation at each period. The cumulative distribution function can be used to obtainthe probability that the displacement demand exceeds a certain value (x), given aresponse period (T Lsi ) for a given magnitude-distance scenario.The displacement demand spectrum that might be used in a loss estimation studycould take the form <strong>of</strong> a code spectrum or else a uniform hazard spectrum derivedfrom PSHA for one or more annual frequencies <strong>of</strong> exceedance. Both <strong>of</strong> these optionshave drawbacks in being obtained from PSHA wherein the contributions from allrelevant sources <strong>of</strong> seismicity are combined into a single rate <strong>of</strong> occurrence for eachlevel <strong>of</strong> a particular ground-motion parameter. The consequence is that if the hazard iscalculated in terms <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> parameters, such as spectral ordinates at severalperiods, the resulting spectrum will sometimes not be compatible with any physicallyfeasible earthquake scenario. Furthermore, if additional ground-motion parameters,such as duration <strong>of</strong> shaking, are to be incorporated – as they are in HAZUS (FEMA,1999), in the definition <strong>of</strong> the inelastic demand spectrum – then it is more rational notto combine all sources <strong>of</strong> seismicity into a single response spectrum but rather to treatindividual earthquakes separately, notwithstanding the computational penalty that thisentails. Another advantage <strong>of</strong> using multiple earthquake scenarios as opposed toPSHA is the facility <strong>of</strong> being able to disaggregate the losses and identify theearthquake events contributing most significantly to the damage.The approach recommended therefore is to use multiple earthquake scenarios,each with an annual frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence determined from recurrencerelationships. For each triggered scenario, the resulting spectra are found from aground-motion prediction equation. In this way, the aleatory uncertainty, asrepresented by the standard deviation <strong>of</strong> the lognormal residuals, can be directlyaccounted for in each spectrum. The cumulative distribution function <strong>of</strong> thedisplacement demand can then be compared with the joint probability densityfunctions <strong>of</strong> displacement capacity and period (Section 3.2), and the annualprobability <strong>of</strong> failure for a class <strong>of</strong> buildings can be found by integrating the failureprobabilities for all the earthquake scenarios (see Crowley et al., 2004).3.2 Probabilistic Treatment <strong>of</strong> the CapacityAs has been presented previously, the limit state displacement capacity (∆ Lsi ) <strong>of</strong> eachbuilding class can be defined as a function <strong>of</strong> the fundamental period (T Lsi ), thegeometrical properties <strong>of</strong> the building, and the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!