Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

peer.berkeley.edu
from peer.berkeley.edu More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

limit states, the suggestions given by Calvi (1999) have been followed (see Crowleyet al., 2004). The non-structural components will again fall within one of four bandsof damage: undamaged, moderate, extensive or complete.2.3 Displacement Capacity as a Function of HeightThe demand in this methodology is represented by a displacement spectrum whichcan be described as providing the expected displacement induced by an earthquake ona single degree of freedom (SDOF) oscillator of given period and damping.Therefore, the displacement capacity equations that are derived must describe thecapacity of a SDOF substitute structure and hence must give the displacementcapacity, both structural and non-structural, at the centre of seismic force of theoriginal structure. In the following sub-sections, structural displacement capacityformulae for moment-resistant reinforced concrete frames exhibiting a beam- orcolumn-sway failure mechanisms are presented.2.3.1 Structural Displacement CapacityBy considering the yield strain of the reinforcing steel and the geometry of the beamand column sections used in a building class, yield section curvatures can be definedusing the relationships suggested by Priestley (2003). These beam and column yieldcurvatures are then multiplied by empirical coefficients to account for shear and jointdeformation to obtain a formula for the yield chord rotation. This chord rotation isequated to base rotation and multiplied by an effective height to produce thedisplacement at the centre of seismic force of the building.The effective height is calculated by multiplying the total height of the structureby an effective height coefficient (ef h ), defined as the ratio of the height to the centreof mass of a SDOF substitute structure (H SDOF ), that has the same displacementcapacity as the original structure at its centre of seismic force (H CSF ), and the totalheight of the original structure (H T ), as explicitly described in the work by Glaisterand Pinho (2003).The yield displacement capacity formulae for beam- and column-sway frames arepresented in Equations (1) and (2) respectively; these are used to define the firststructural limit state.lb∆Sy= 0.5efhHTεyhh∆Sy= 0.43efhHTεyhbsc(1)(2)Post-yield displacement capacity formulae are obtained by adding a post-yielddisplacement component to the yield displacement, calculated by multiplying togetherthe limit state plastic section curvature, the plastic hinge length, and the height/lengthof the yielding member. The post-yield displacement capacity formulae for RC beam-176

and column-sway frames are presented here in Equations (3) and (4), respectively. Inthis formulation, the soft-storey of the column-sway mechanism is assumed to form atthe ground floor. Straightforward adaptation of the equations could easily beintroduced in the cases where the soft-storey is expected to form at storeys other thanthe ground floor, but this is not dealt with herein.lb∆ = 0.5ef H ε + 0.5( ε( )+ ε( )− 1.7 ε ) ef Hh∆SLsi h T y C Lsi S Lsi y h TbSLsi=hs0.43efhHTεy+ 0.5( εC( Lsi )+ εS( Lsi )− 2.14εyhc) hs(3)(4)A detailed account of the derivation of Equations (1) through to (4) can beobtained from the work of Glaister and Pinho (2003). These equations employ thefollowing parameters:∆ Sy∆ SLsief hH Tε yl bh bh sh cε C(Lsi)ε S(Lsi)structural yield (limit state 1) displacement capacitystructural limit state i (2 or 3) displacement capacityeffective height coefficienttotal height of the original structureyield strain of the reinforcementlength of beamdepth of beam sectionheight of storeydepth of column sectionmaximum allowable concrete strain for limit state imaximum allowable steel strain for limit state i2.3.2 Non-Structural Displacement CapacityIn the derivation of the non-structural displacement capacity equations for beam-swayframes, the effective height coefficient cannot be used directly because, rather thanmechanically deriving a base rotation capacity, as in the structural displacementcapacity formulation, it is the roof deformation capacity that is directly obtained (seeCrowley et al., 2004). Hence a relationship between the deformation at the roof andthe deformation at the centre of seismic force is required. The factor relating thesetwo displacements is named a shape factor (S) and it can be found from thedisplacement profiles suggested by Priestley (2003) for beam-sway frames of variousheights. The non-structural displacement capacity of the SDOF substitute structure(∆ NSLsi ) for a given limit state i can thus be found by multiplying the roofdisplacement by the shape factor to give the displacement at the centre of seismicforce of the structure, as presented in Equation (5), where ϑ i stands for the drift ratiocapacity at limit state i (Crowley et al., 2004).177

and column-sway frames are presented here in Equations (3) and (4), respectively. Inthis formulation, the s<strong>of</strong>t-storey <strong>of</strong> the column-sway mechanism is assumed to form atthe ground floor. Straightforward adaptation <strong>of</strong> the equations could easily beintroduced in the cases where the s<strong>of</strong>t-storey is expected to form at storeys other thanthe ground floor, but this is not dealt with herein.lb∆ = 0.5ef H ε + 0.5( ε( )+ ε( )− 1.7 ε ) ef Hh∆SLsi h T y C Lsi S Lsi y h TbSLsi=hs0.43efhHTεy+ 0.5( εC( Lsi )+ εS( Lsi )− 2.14εyhc) hs(3)(4)A detailed account <strong>of</strong> the derivation <strong>of</strong> Equations (1) through to (4) can beobtained from the work <strong>of</strong> Glaister and Pinho (2003). These equations employ thefollowing parameters:∆ Sy∆ SLsief hH Tε yl bh bh sh cε C(Lsi)ε S(Lsi)structural yield (limit state 1) displacement capacitystructural limit state i (2 or 3) displacement capacityeffective height coefficienttotal height <strong>of</strong> the original structureyield strain <strong>of</strong> the reinforcementlength <strong>of</strong> beamdepth <strong>of</strong> beam sectionheight <strong>of</strong> storeydepth <strong>of</strong> column sectionmaximum allowable concrete strain for limit state imaximum allowable steel strain for limit state i2.3.2 Non-Structural Displacement CapacityIn the derivation <strong>of</strong> the non-structural displacement capacity equations for beam-swayframes, the effective height coefficient cannot be used directly because, rather thanmechanically deriving a base rotation capacity, as in the structural displacementcapacity formulation, it is the ro<strong>of</strong> deformation capacity that is directly obtained (seeCrowley et al., 2004). Hence a relationship between the deformation at the ro<strong>of</strong> andthe deformation at the centre <strong>of</strong> seismic force is required. The factor relating thesetwo displacements is named a shape factor (S) and it can be found from thedisplacement pr<strong>of</strong>iles suggested by Priestley (2003) for beam-sway frames <strong>of</strong> variousheights. The non-structural displacement capacity <strong>of</strong> the SDOF substitute structure(∆ NSLsi ) for a given limit state i can thus be found by multiplying the ro<strong>of</strong>displacement by the shape factor to give the displacement at the centre <strong>of</strong> seismicforce <strong>of</strong> the structure, as presented in Equation (5), where ϑ i stands for the drift ratiocapacity at limit state i (Crowley et al., 2004).177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!