12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(3) An international web-based repository should be developed and maintained forperformance data and information <strong>of</strong> interest in the context <strong>of</strong> performance-basedearthquake engineering, including a stakeholder encyclopedia (describing anddefining performance in a manner meaningful to the stakeholders) and fragilitydata for structural, nonstructural, and content components and systems. As part<strong>of</strong> this effort, protocols should be developed for testing and documentation <strong>of</strong>experimental results.Working Group on Implementation <strong>of</strong> PBEE in Engineering PracticeCo-Chairs: Hamburger and KabeyasawaRecorder: BommerWorking Group Members: Alcocer, Aschheim, Aydinoĝlu, Bonelli, Booth,Chopra, Cosenza, Deierlein, Fajfar, Fardis, Fischinger, Ghobarah, Kowalsky,Krawinkler, Kunnath, Negro, Otani, Pinto A., Rutenberg, Shiohara, Sritharan,Tsai, Tso, Dolšek, Marušić, Peruš, Poljanšek, Sigmund, ZevnikConclusions and Recommendations(1) Performance-based seismic design can be viewed as a process <strong>of</strong> systemconception followed by an assessment procedure in which the performance <strong>of</strong> thestructural system is evaluated and improved as needed to satisfy statedperformance objectives. Design tools should be developed, particularly for newstructures, to assist in the conception <strong>of</strong> an effective structural system in order toprovide a good starting point for subsequent assessment. Direct design, withoutsubsequent assessment, is a feasible option for simple structures.(2) The foundation <strong>of</strong> PBSD procedures should be reliability based. Forimplementation in engineering practice, the reliability concepts may beincorporated implicitly through appropriate demand and capacity factors, whileexplicit incorporation <strong>of</strong> reliability concepts is an option to be consideredprimarily for major facilities with special performance requirements. Reliabilityconcepts should also be considered to improve and transition existing code-baseddesign methods and to improve the calibration <strong>of</strong> prescriptive rules in existingcodes. They may also be partially introduced into codes to aid the transition t<strong>of</strong>ull use <strong>of</strong> PBSD.(3) PBSD concepts should be incorporated into codes on a worldwide basis, but withdue consideration to the need for simplicity and for sound engineering judgment,and with due consideration <strong>of</strong> economic and societal priorities.(4) Opportunities should be sought out to demonstrate the feasibility and advantages<strong>of</strong> PBSD approaches compared to presently employed prescriptive approaches.(5) Future guidelines and codes must be clear regarding the limitations in the use <strong>of</strong>the different analytical procedures (linear static, nonlinear static, linear dynamic,xiv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!