12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.1 Performance ObjectivesAn important goal <strong>of</strong> the ATC-58 project is to utilize performance objectives that arequantifiable and predictable, as well as meaningful and useful for the decision makerswho must select or approve the objectives used as a basis for design. Decisionmakers are a disparate group that includes building developers, facility managers, riskmanagers, lenders, insurers, public agencies, regulators and individual members <strong>of</strong> thepublic. Each <strong>of</strong> these decision makers view seismic performance from a differentperspective and select desired performance using different decision making processes.Regardless <strong>of</strong> the specific process used, selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate performance willinvolve development <strong>of</strong> an understanding <strong>of</strong> the risk associated with a given choiceand the resources that must be invested to reduce this risk beyond certain thresholds.To facilitate this process, in the ATC-58 project performance objectives are expressedas the risk <strong>of</strong> incurring three specific kinds <strong>of</strong> earthquake induced loss. These includedirect financial losses (dollars) associated with the cost <strong>of</strong> repairing or replacingdamaged facilities, earthquake-induced life losses (deaths and serious injuries) andlost use <strong>of</strong> facilities (downtime) while they are being repaired, replaced or otherwiserestored to service.Different decision makers characterize these risks and determine acceptablelevels <strong>of</strong> risk in different ways. Therefore the next-generation guidelines permitalternative methods <strong>of</strong> stating performance objectives including: expected losses,given the occurrence <strong>of</strong> a specific earthquake scenario, annualized losses, or theexpected loss over a given period <strong>of</strong> years, each expressed together with a level <strong>of</strong>confidence associated with the estimate. Examples include Probable MaximumLosses (estimates <strong>of</strong> the 90% confidence level loss given a specific event), averageannual loss (the mean loss per year averaged over many years) or the 500-year loss(that loss which has a 10% chance <strong>of</strong> being exceed in 50 years). Many other similarmeans <strong>of</strong> expression will be accommodated.2.2 Perform Preliminary DesignThe preliminary design for a building includes definition <strong>of</strong> all features that aresignificant to its probable future seismic performance. This includes the building’ssite characteristics, its basic configuration, materials <strong>of</strong> construction and structuralsystems, foundation type, stiffness and strength, and to the extent that responsemodification technologies such as seismic isolation or energy dissipation systems areincorporated in the design, the characteristics <strong>of</strong> these systems. Review <strong>of</strong> lossesexperienced by buildings in past earthquakes clearly indicates that except in thosebuildings where gross structural failure or collapse occurred, most economic andoccupancy losses were the result <strong>of</strong> damage to nonstructural components and systems.Therefore, the preliminary design must also include consideration <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong>nonstructural components and systems that are to be installed in the building and theway in which they will be installed.92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!