Paired Hemodiafiltration (HDF with on-line ... - APCN 2010

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HFR: Unique RRT that Utilize Convection, Diffusion and AdsorptionConvective fieldBetter removal ofBetter removal of Highhigh MW toxinsMW ToxinsNo net fluid removalDiffusive fieldBetter removal ofhydrosoluble low MWtoxinsQufQdiQdoAdsorbent fieldReinfusion flow(QR)Removal of “bad toxins” byadsorptionReinfusion of importantphysiological molecules
Removal of beta 2 -microglobulin28 uremic patientsBalasco PG et al. : Int J Artif Organs 29: 1042-52, 2006 3 periods of observation: a) HD for three months; b) HFR for three months; c) HFR for a further 3months32.91±6.1mg/L26.4±8.1mg/L• No differences <strong>with</strong> regard to: dialytic efficiency, nutritional status, calcemia, phosphatemia
Page 1 and 2: Paired Hem
Page 3 and 4: DiffusionTransfer by diffusion is t
Page 5 and 6: Improve Quality of Hemodialysis Tec
Page 7 and 8: Hemodiafiltration(
Page 9 and 10: HDF problem Interf
Page 11 and 12: Hemodiafiltration<
Page 13 and 14: On-line Hemodiafiltration</
Page 15 and 16: Paired Hem
Page 17 and 18: Resolve of HDF pro
Page 19 and 20: Therapeutic Goal of HFRSeparate and
Page 21 and 22: Long-term Data of HFR using Uncoate
Page 23: “Regenerated UF” Used as Endoge
Page 27 and 28: Inflammatory Markers (HD vs. <stron
Page 29 and 30: Changes in serum leptin & adiponect
Page 31 and 32: Effect of a hemodiafiltration sessi
Page 33 and 34: The hemodiafiltration with<
Page 35 and 36: Selective adsorption of homocystein
Page 37 and 38: MethodsTen patients, mean age of 58
Page 39 and 40: ResultsParametersLow flux HD(-12 wk
Page 41 and 42: Beta2-MG41.95 ± 11.1328.47 ± 6.45
Page 43 and 44: URR
Page 45 and 46: ConclusionAlthough HFR treatment is
Page 47 and 48: ConclusionHFR A unique and effectiv

Paired Hemodiafiltration (HDF with on-line ... - APCN 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?