Download Full PDF - 28.09 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters

Download Full PDF - 28.09 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters Download Full PDF - 28.09 MB - The Society of Irish Foresters

societyofirishforesters.ie
from societyofirishforesters.ie More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

PUBLIC BUSINESSThe main item of public business was an address by M. X. LeChatelier, of theE.E.C. Commission, Brussels, entitled Forestry in the European EconomicCommunity. The address is printed in full elsewhere in this issue. The vote ofthanks was proposed by Dr. Pierce Ryan, Deputy Director of The AgriculturalI nstitute. The first point that struck him, he said, was the difference in scalebetween European forestry covering 22 % of the territory, compared with about4 % here. There is also the difference in ownership referred to by M. Le Chatelier-with 58% of forests privately owned in the E.E.C. and only 10% in Ireland.A third difference is in the mean age of the forests. Most of ours are recentlyplanted, the age pattern of forests on the Continent is more uniform. It may betherefore that Community regulations on forestry are quite unsuited to oursituation.Production from Irish forests is as yet quite small and economies of scale havehardly begun to operate. We have protected the wood processing industry withrelatively high tariff barriers-as an infant industry capable of development.The general level of tariffs on these products which we will have to accept onbecoming members of the E.E.C. may be considerably lower than those we atpresent have-implying increased competition for our wood processing industriesand a tendency towards lower prices. The production advantages obtained fromour climate and soils for certain types of timber ought to outweigh thesedisadvantages.A more pressing problem for Irish forestry may well be the increasing cost ofland as a result of joining the E.E.C. The price of land is df'termined of courseby the income likely to be derived from it. In the E.E.C. the income expected tobe derived from Irish farmland is expected to increase spectacularly. Sellingprices for beef and mutton in the E.E.C. are confidently expected to be 50%and 70 % above corresponding Irish prices in 1970. Costs are not likely to increaseto anything like the same extent, with the result that gross margins shouldincrease--even at present levels of production. But the major bonus of E.E.C.membership for farming is expected in the environment for expansion which itwill create and the expected intensification of production which will followgivingeven better gross margins. The White Paper estimates that the volume ofoutput of beef will rise by half a million head by 1978 and the volume of milkoutput will increase by over 50%. These increases are easily attainable providedthe capital is provided. Certainly with existing technology our grasslands arecapable of supporting many more cattle.Rational policies of land-use have to take account not only of productionpossibilities arising from climatic or soil factors but of economics and business.The basic problem with regard to Forestry is the length of waiting for a returnon capital. The gross returns, when discounted to the present, give low returnsoftenless than that for unimproved agriculture. Gross margins per acre inagriculture are likely to improve significantly upon our entry to the E.E.C. andthe economic or accounting balance may be tilted against forestry-even ingood forestry areas likeLeitrim. The multi-purpose use of forests and the creationof forest parks is therefore to be welcomed. So also is M. Le Chatelier's newsabout expenditure from the Guidance and Guarantee Fund to finance certainforestry schemes. I w;):Jld like to know, how~v~r, from him whether these grantcan be mlde to a State For~st Corporation or are they designed for privatforestry only.Another point w~ shouli like to hlV~ chrifid is the possibility of repla cemeof m:Jch of th~ tradltlonll wooi m lrket by syoth!t ics. The statistics give a ropicture-of continuing d~J.;its in th! mubt, exactly the sort of environment

70 Irish Forestryencourage the development of substitutes. We have seen some of this developmentin the furniture trade. What is the official opinion of the possibility of suchdevelopment, say in the paper trade?In seconding the vote of thanks, Mr. T. McEvoy, Inspector General, Forestand Wildlife Service, Dublin, wondered was it French or E.E.C. courtesy thatinduced Monsieur Le Chatelier to convert to our Irish, Imperial or British unitsat a time when we are in the process of metrication. Our next Forest Report willbe in hectares and cubic metres-and so one obstacle in the path to Europe willbe removed!We are indebted to Monsieur Le Chatelier for the first authoritative elucidationof forestry problems in the E.E.C. It is all the more welcome because the Government'sbooklet "The Accession of Ireland to the European Communities" issilent on this topic and there has been little public discussion. Last Autumn theAgricultural Science Association did have a discussion with contributions fromthe late H. J. Gray and a representative of the forest products industry buttonight's discussion gains enormously from Monsieur Le Chatelier's contribution,his presence and willingness to answer questions.I must also express my personal pleasure at meeting again one who has becomea familiar and respected figure-and indeed, a friend-at various assemblies inEurope-Rome, Geneva, Strasburg, Brussels.Let me begin my comments by referring to the forestry policy background inthe Republic. Unlike many Irish industries, we in forestry have for many yearsaccepted the idea of free international trade in forest products and we haveworked on the basis of establishing here a forest estate and a forest industrywhich would stand on its own feet without protection or subsidy. The old policyof self sufficiency (Sinn Fein) went long ago and we look forward to producingin time an export surplus. In fact already in the particle board and fibre boardsector, there is a substantial export trade to Britain and elsewhere.It follows that the E.E.C. external tariff on forest products (3-13 %) is for usan "unconvenanted benefit" and will improve our position in, say, the particleboard market which is now of great importance to us as the main outlet forcurrent forest produce i.e. thinnings.Our confidence in this approach to entry to E.E.C. is built on several factors.The first is the inherent advantages we in Ireland possess in our soil and climatefor the rapid growth of certain coniferous species, especially Sitka spruce, fromthe American Pacific coast. Our yields are only seldom attainable on the EuropeanContinent and in Britain obtainable only in the western parts.M. Le Chatelier has given the European average as 36 H. feet, of which 26 isindustrial.Our state forests have an average yield class of 126 representing a productionof 107-115 H. ft. This is a figure which we expect to improve on as we eliminatelow yielders like Contorta Pine (inland and Lulu) and Scots Pine on unsuitablesites. The aim since 1967 has been Yield Class 160 and this has been attained inland acquisition over the last 5 years.Second point is as follows-Allied to this advantage in growth rates is thetrend in the wood market in favour of small size trees. In Europe the traditionalrotation for conifers of up to 150 years yielded prime, clean timber of largedimensions but the market for such timber has become less and less attractive.Large sizes for structural use have been replaced by steel and concrete and morerecently by laminated beams made up from smaller timbers. The Europeanmarket for saw timber generally has grown only slowly-at one third the ratesor small sizes. So much so that by 1980 the proportion of large to small will be3:4 j,e. 25% more small timber than large and 50% more in the British market.

70 <strong>Irish</strong> Forestryencourage the development <strong>of</strong> substitutes. We have seen some <strong>of</strong> this developmentin the furniture trade. What is the <strong>of</strong>ficial opinion <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> suchdevelopment, say in the paper trade?In seconding the vote <strong>of</strong> thanks, Mr. T. McEvoy, Inspector General, Forestand Wildlife Service, Dublin, wondered was it French or E.E.C. courtesy thatinduced Monsieur Le Chatelier to convert to our <strong>Irish</strong>, Imperial or British unitsat a time when we are in the process <strong>of</strong> metrication. Our next Forest Report willbe in hectares and cubic metres-and so one obstacle in the path to Europe willbe removed!We are indebted to Monsieur Le Chatelier for the first authoritative elucidation<strong>of</strong> forestry problems in the E.E.C. It is all the more welcome because the Government'sbooklet "<strong>The</strong> Accession <strong>of</strong> Ireland to the European Communities" issilent on this topic and there has been little public discussion. Last Autumn theAgricultural Science Association did have a discussion with contributions fromthe late H. J. Gray and a representative <strong>of</strong> the forest products industry buttonight's discussion gains enormously from Monsieur Le Chatelier's contribution,his presence and willingness to answer questions.I must also express my personal pleasure at meeting again one who has becomea familiar and respected figure-and indeed, a friend-at various assemblies inEurope-Rome, Geneva, Strasburg, Brussels.Let me begin my comments by referring to the forestry policy background inthe Republic. Unlike many <strong>Irish</strong> industries, we in forestry have for many yearsaccepted the idea <strong>of</strong> free international trade in forest products and we haveworked on the basis <strong>of</strong> establishing here a forest estate and a forest industrywhich would stand on its own feet without protection or subsidy. <strong>The</strong> old policy<strong>of</strong> self sufficiency (Sinn Fein) went long ago and we look forward to producingin time an export surplus. In fact already in the particle board and fibre boardsector, there is a substantial export trade to Britain and elsewhere.It follows that the E.E.C. external tariff on forest products (3-13 %) is for usan "unconvenanted benefit" and will improve our position in, say, the particleboard market which is now <strong>of</strong> great importance to us as the main outlet forcurrent forest produce i.e. thinnings.Our confidence in this approach to entry to E.E.C. is built on several factors.<strong>The</strong> first is the inherent advantages we in Ireland possess in our soil and climatefor the rapid growth <strong>of</strong> certain coniferous species, especially Sitka spruce, fromthe American Pacific coast. Our yields are only seldom attainable on the EuropeanContinent and in Britain obtainable only in the western parts.M. Le Chatelier has given the European average as 36 H. feet, <strong>of</strong> which 26 isindustrial.Our state forests have an average yield class <strong>of</strong> 126 representing a production<strong>of</strong> 107-115 H. ft. This is a figure which we expect to improve on as we eliminatelow yielders like Contorta Pine (inland and Lulu) and Scots Pine on unsuitablesites. <strong>The</strong> aim since 1967 has been Yield Class 160 and this has been attained inland acquisition over the last 5 years.Second point is as follows-Allied to this advantage in growth rates is thetrend in the wood market in favour <strong>of</strong> small size trees. In Europe the traditionalrotation for conifers <strong>of</strong> up to 150 years yielded prime, clean timber <strong>of</strong> largedimensions but the market for such timber has become less and less attractive.Large sizes for structural use have been replaced by steel and concrete and morerecently by laminated beams made up from smaller timbers. <strong>The</strong> Europeanmarket for saw timber generally has grown only slowly-at one third the ratesor small sizes. So much so that by 1980 the proportion <strong>of</strong> large to small will be3:4 j,e. 25% more small timber than large and 50% more in the British market.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!