28.11.2012 Views

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

yugoslavias implosion

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

economically, or communicationally.” 51 Ćosić insisted on the “democratic<br />

principle of self-determination and a peaceful parting of the<br />

ways” and on equal rights for the Serbs in Croatia. 52 He was prepared<br />

to “grant the same rights to the Shqiptars [i.e., ethnic Albanians]<br />

in Kosovo” because he considered the principle universal. 53 Ćosić’s<br />

formulation of the right of self-determination carried the seed of<br />

conflict because, in his view, Serbs would be able to exercise their<br />

right of self-determination six times: in Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina,<br />

Montenegro, Kosovo, Macedonia, and, of course, Serbia.<br />

However, the economic situation was unfavorable for reform<br />

and Yugoslav politicians did their best to maintain the status quo.<br />

For the first time, Yugoslavia faced serious problems in servicing its<br />

external debt of us$20 billion as well as its internal debt. Prime Minister<br />

Milka Planinc’s attempts to start reforms failed and the problems<br />

that had been poisoning the relations between the republics,<br />

such as the question of foreign exchange, surged to the surface. The<br />

government found it increasingly difficult, in the midst of a global<br />

recession, to obtain credit from financial institutions demanding<br />

serious reform.<br />

Commissions led by Sergej Kraigher, Josip Vrhovec, and Tihomir<br />

Vlaškalić were set up to deal with the crisis. Yet the majority of intellectuals<br />

involved were weighed down by their Yugoslav experience<br />

and sought solutions in conformity with it, rather than looking to<br />

the East or to the West. Speakers at numerous seminars and congresses<br />

argued for a multiparty system as a substitute for the playedout<br />

one-party rule, criticizing in particular the party’s monopoly<br />

on economic activity. The political trend was heterogeneous and,<br />

in some aspects, even pan-Yugoslav; yet in Serbia, following the<br />

51 Interview with Dobrica Ćosić in Politika,26 July 1991<br />

52 Ibid .<br />

53 Quoted in Slavoljub Đukić, Lovljenje vetra (Chasing the Wind) ( Politička ispovest Dobrice<br />

Ćosića – Political Confession of Dobrica Ćosić), (Beograd; Samizdat Free B92, 2001)<br />

65<br />

ChApter 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!